Original Article                                                                               21
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62143/9sbdcg94
  Knowledge, Attitude and Practice regarding Cervical Cancer
Screening among Married Women Attending in a Tertiary Hospital
Biva Shrestha1, Durga Subedi2, Krishna Devi Shrestha3*
Author(s) Affiliation
1
  Man Mohan Memorial Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu
2
  Department of Women’s Health & Development, Maharajgunj Nursing Campus
3
  Department of Adult Health Nursing, Maharajgunj Nursing Campus
*Corresponding Author: Krishna_kr06@yahoo.com
  ABSTRACT
  Introduction: Globally, cervical cancer is a serious burden on reproductive health of women
  which is preventable through early detection. The objective of this study was to find out the
  knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding cervical cancer screening among the married
  women.
  Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional research was conducted in Tribhuvan University Teaching
  Hospital (TUTH). Non- probability purposive sampling technique was adopted. Data was
  collected using a structured interview questionnaire among 195 respondents from Gynae OPD.
  Data analysis was done by descriptive and inferential statistics.
  Results: More than two third of the respondents (67.7%) had adequate knowledge regarding
  cervical cancer screening, 60% had inadequate practice and all the respondents had positive
  attitudes of screening. Most of the respondents (86.2%) said that having multiple sexual partner
  followed by sexually transmitted infection (84.1%) & multiparty (75.4%) were the causes and
  84.6% stated that increased vaginal discharge, post-menopausal bleeding (79.5%) and irregular
  menstruation (67.2%) were the symptoms of cervical cancer. Almost all respondents (97.4%)
  said that early screening as preventive measures. The level of knowledge tends to be associated
  with age of the respondents and their socio-economic status (p=<0.05) whereas in practice,
  there was no association between selected variables.
  Conclusion: Although respondents had adequate knowledge and positive attitude on cervical
  cancer and its screening, less than half of the respondents only practice Pap smear test as
  screening. The level of knowledge tends to be significantly associated with age of the respondents
  and their socio-economic status.
  Keywords: Attitude, Cervical Cancer, Knowledge, Practice, Screening
INTRODUCTION                                        frequent cancer among women2 and is emerging
                                                    as the leading cause of death caused by poor
Cancer of the cervix is a serious burden on the
                                                    health seeking behavior, poor access to screening
reproductive health of women world-wide.1It is
                                                    and treatment services.3 Cervical cancer has very
the fourth most common cancer globally among
                                                    poor prognosis as 80% of them are diagnosed
women with an estimated 570,000 new cases in
                                                    at an advanced clinical stage. Nepal has one of
2018 representing 6.6% of all female cancers.
                                                    the highest incidences and mortality rates in
Approximately 90% of deaths in low- and middle-
                                                    Southeast Asian region.4
income countries are due to cervical cancer.
In Nepal, cervical cancer ranks as the 1st most
                                                  Journal of Nursing Education of Nepal/ 2023 Vol. 14
22   Biva Shrestha, et al.,
National Guideline for Cervical Cancer Screening          with selected variables among married women.
and Prevention program in Nepal had the objective         Non- probability purposive sampling technique
to screen at least 50% of women aged 30 to 60             was adopted to collect data among 195
years to reduce 10% cervical cancer burden                respondents attending at Gynae OPD of TUTH
within 5years 5. Majority (about 95%) of women            after obtaining Ethical approval (Ref. 97 (6-11)E2
still never have done cervical cancer screening.          076/077) from Institutional Review Committee of
Among them, proportion of unscreened women                Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University. After
is much higher among the illiterate women and             taking administrative written permission from
living in the rural region 6. Cervical cancer is one of   TUTH, written consent was obtained from each
the preventable cancers that can be prevented by          respondent prior to data collection. Voluntary
early detection and treatment 7. Cervical cancer          participation and withdrawal from the study at
screening services coverage rate is very low (2.4%)       any time without giving reason was considered.
in Nepal. The low coverage may be associated to           Anonymity was maintained during data collection
a variety of factors, including socio-economic            by giving code numbers, Confidentiality was
and cultural barriers. Studies have documented            maintained by keeping the information for study
poverty, lack of knowledge, myths, lack of time,          purpose only and privacy was maintained by
asymptomatic condition, support from husbands             collecting data in a separate area for each woman.
& families, and lack of routine screening as major
                                                          Data was collected using a structured
obstacles to screening in Nepal. Moreover, lack
                                                          interview questionnaire from 1st September to
of privacy during screening, embarrassment
                                                          27th September 2019. A structured interview
among women, and low importance given to
                                                          schedule was prepared by the researcher herself
women’s health issues have also been cited as
                                                          based on research objective, reviewing the
factors contributing to the reluctance of women
                                                          related literature, consultation, and validation of
to access cervical cancer screening services in
                                                          instrument with research expert. The instrument
low-income countries 8.
                                                          consisted of four parts; Part I: Questions
Prevention and control of cervical cancer                 related to Socio-demographic variables, Part II:
depends on awareness about disease, screening             Questions related to knowledge about cervical
procedures, and preventive measures 9..Although           cancer screening, Part III: Questions related to
numerous studies have been conducted                      practice on cervical cancer screening, Part IV:
to evaluate the awareness level of cervical               Questions related to attitude towards cervical
cancer, contributing and risk factors, cervical           cancer screening. For each correct response
screening test, the attitude towards it as well as        was given 1 score and 0 for incorrect response
the preventative practices, the effectiveness of          and additional score was given for each correct
cervical cancer screening depend to a great extent        multiple response. Pre-testing was done in
on the level of awareness10.. Moreover, despite           10% of the respondents attending Gynae OPD
availability of HPV vaccines, cervical cancer             of Manamohan Memorial Medical College and
continues to be a major public health problem.            Teaching Hospital. Necessary modification was
Hence, knowledge, attitude and practice towards           done based on the feedback of pretest. Data
cervical cancer screening should be studied and           was edited, coded, and entered into IBM SPSS
comprehended profoundly 11.                               version 16 program. Data was analyzed by using
                                                          descriptive statistics (as frequency, percentage,
METHODS                                                   mean and standard deviation) and inferential
Descriptive cross-sectional research design was           statistical test (chi-square test) was used to
adopted to assess the level of knowledge and to           measure the association between variables.
measure the association of level of knowledge
Journal of Nursing Education of Nepal/ 2023 Vol. 14
                                Knowledge, Attitude and Practice regarding Cervical Cancer...     23
RESULTS                                           Table 1 shows that nearly one third of respondents
                                                  (32.8%) were between the age of 40 to 49 years.
Table 1: Socio-demographic Characteristics of     The mean age was 37.44±9.57 years. Among
the Respondents                     (n=195)       them most of the respondents (86.7%) were able
                                                  to read and write. Half of the respondents (50.9)
Characteristics          Number   Percentage
                                                  had University level education. Majority of the
                                                  respondents (80.0%) were Hindus and 54.9 were
Age in completed years
                                                  Brahmin/Chettri followed by Janajati (36.9%).
20-29                      47        24.1         Table 2: Respondents’ Knowledge on Preventive
                                                  Measures of Cervical Cancer          (n=195)
30-39                      62        31.8
40-49                      64        32.8         Variables               Number       Percentage
50-59                      22        11.3
                                                  Preventive
                                                  Measures*
Mean Age ±SD;
37.44±9.57
                                                  Early screening           190           97.4
Education status
                                                  Treating STI              164           84.1
Read and write            169        86.7
Cannot read and write      26        13.3         Practice safe sex         136           69.7
Education level(n=169)                            HPV vaccination            29           14.8
Basic/Elementary           47        27.8
                                                  Knowledge of              154           79.0
                                                  screening test
Secondary                  36        21.3
University level           86        50.9         Screening tests*
                                                  (n=154)
Religion
                                                  Pap smear                 154           100.0
Hinduism                  156        80.1
                                                  VIA                        18           11.6
Buddhism                   27        13.8
Christianity               10         5.1         HPV test                    2            1.2
Islam                      2          1.0
                                                  *Multiple Responses
Ethnicity                                         Table 2 shows that cent percent respondents
                                                  said that having knowledge regarding cervical
Bhrahmin/Chettri          107        54.9
                                                  cancer can prevent cervical cancer. Almost all
Janajati                   72        36.9         respondent (97.4%) said that early screening
                                                  as a preventive measure followed by treating
Dalit                      13         6.7         STI (84.1%) and only 14.8% answered that HPV
                                                  vaccination can prevent cervical cancer. The
Muslim                     2           1
                                                  majority of the respondents (79%) had knowledge
Madhesi                    1          0.5         of screening test.
                                                Journal of Nursing Education of Nepal/ 2023 Vol. 14
24   Biva Shrestha, et al.,
Table 3: Respondents’ Practice on Cervical            Table 3 shows that less than half of the
Cancer Screening                  (n=195)             respondents (45.6%) had cervical cancer
                                                      screening. Among them 75.3% respondents used
Variables                   Number   Percentage       to screen yearly for cervical cancer and 14.7%
                                                      respondents screen every 3 yearly, and 40.4%
Screened for cervical       89       45.6             were screened between 30-39 years. Similarly,
cancer                                                almost all respondents (96.6%) had screened
                                                      within three years as per health personnel advice
Frequency of screening
(n=89)                                                (78.6%) . Among the respondents who were not
                                                      screened for cervical cancer were due to feeling
Yearly                      67       75.3             of being not at risk (54.8%) followed by lack of
                                                      awareness (33%).
Two yearly                  6        6.7
                                                      Table 4: Respondents’ Level of Knowledge and
Three yearly                13       14.7
                                                      Practice on Cervical Cancer Screening (n=195)
Four yearly                 3        3.3
                                                       Levels                    Number    Percentage
Age of Screening (n=89)
                                                       Knowledge
20-29                       17       19.1
30-39                       36       40.4              Adequate Level ≥ 50%        132         67.7
40-49                       32       36.0              Inadequate Level < 50%       63         32.3
50-59                       4        4.5
                                                       Practice
Time of last screening
(n=89)                                                 Adequate Level ≥ 50%         78          40
Within 3 years              86       96.6              Inadequate Level < 50%      117          60
Before 3yrs                 3        3.4
                                                      Table 4 reveals that two third of the respondents
Reason for screening
(n=89)                                                (67.7%) had adequate level of knowledge and
                                                      more than half of the respondent (60%) had
Health personnel advice     70       78.6             inadequate practice of screening.
Self-initiative             19       21.4             Table 5 reflects almost all respondents (92.8%)
Attend to seek care                                   strongly agreed that cervical cancer screening is
(n=195)                                               very important whereas most of all respondents
                                                      (90.3%) strongly disagreed in the statement
Go to health center         123      63.1             cervical cancer screening is recommended only
Consult doctor              72       36.9             for sexually active women. Thirty six percent
                                                      respondents agreed that women having sexually
Reason for not                                        transmitted disease are more prone to have
screening (n=106)                                     cervical cancer. Majority of the respondents
Feeling of being not at risk 58      54.8             (76.9%) strongly disagreed that cervical
                                                      cancer screening is not recommended for HPV
Lack of awareness           35       33.0             vaccinated women. Most of the respondents
                                                      (89.7%) strongly agreed that cervical cancer can
Not recommended             13       12.2
                                                      be managed after its diagnosis in the early stage.
Journal of Nursing Education of Nepal/ 2023 Vol. 14
                                       Knowledge, Attitude and Practice regarding Cervical Cancer...        25
Table 5: Respondents’ Attitude towards Cervical Cancer Screening                                   (n=195)
 Statements                                 Strongly       Disagree    Neutral     Agree       Strongly
                                            Disagree                                           Agree
                                            No. (%)        No. (%)     No. (%)     No. (%)     No. (%)
 Cervical cancer is life threatening        11 (5.6)       37 (19)     31 (15.9)   55(28.2)    61 (31.3)
 disease
 Women having sexually transmitted          9 (4.6)        27(13.8)    24 (12.3)   72 (36.9)   63(32.4)
 disease are more prone to have cervical
 cancer*
 Cervical cancer screening is very          0 (0.0)        0 (0.0)     2 (1)       12 (6.2)    181 (92.8)
 important
 Cervical cancer can be managed after       0 (0.0)        3 (1.5)     5 (2.6)     12 (6.2)    175 (89.7)
 its diagnosis in the early stage.
 Cervical cancer screening is suggested     1 (0.5)        14 (7.2)    63 (32.3)   21 (10.8)   96 (49.2)
 for all gynecological cancer*
 All women above 20 years should have       3 (1.5)        3 (1.5)     17 (8.7)    58 (29.8)   114 (58.5)
 done cervical screening
 Cervical cancer screening is not           150 (76.9)     16 (8.3)    25 (12.8)   2 (1)       2 (1)
 recommended for HPV vaccinated
 women. *
 Cervical cancer screening is               176 (90.3)     11 (5.6)    4 (2.1)     3 (1.5)     1 (0.5)
 recommended only for sexually active
 women*
 Cervical cancer screening is not           175 (89.8)     9 (4.6)     7 (3.6)     2 (1)       2 (1)
 needed for women above 65 years. *
 Cervical cancer screening is a painful     77 (39.5)      16 (8.2)    98 (50.3)   4 (2.0)      0 (0.0)
 procedure*
 Cervical cancer is a time-consuming        84 (43.1)      13 (6.7)    97 (49.7)   1 (0.5)      0 (0.0)
 procedure*
 If proper information and chance           5 (2.5)        2 (1.0)     7 (3.6)     28 (14.4)   153 (78.5)
 is provided, I will be prepared to
 participate in cervical cancer screening
*Negative Responses
                                                         Journal of Nursing Education of Nepal/ 2023 Vol. 14
26    Biva Shrestha, et al.,
Table 6: Association of Level of Knowledge regarding Cervical Cancer Screening with Selected Variables (n=195)
Variables                                                    Level of Knowledge
                                                      Adequate           Inadequate     χ2Value     p-value
                                                      No.( %)            No.( %)
Age group (in years)
 Below 40                                             67(60.4)           44(39.6)       6.334       0.012*
 40 and above                                         65(77.4)           19(22.6)
Educational Status
Basic Level                                           33(70.2)           14(29.8)       0.699       0.705
Secondary Level                                       25(69.4)           11(30.6)
Higher Secondary Level                                65(75.6)           21(24.4)
Religion
Hinduism                                              102(65.4)          54(34.6)       1.899       0.168
Others (Buddhism, Christianity, Islam)                30(76.9)           9(23.1)
Ethnicity
Brahmin/Chettri                                       68(67.5)           39(32.5)       6.557       1.000**
Janajati                                              49(68.1)           23(31.9)
Others (Dalit, Muslim, Madhesi)                       12(66.7)           4(33.3)
Duration of Marriage
Less than 20 years                                    88(66.7)           44(33.3)       0.197       0.658
20 years and above                                    44(69.8)           19(30.2)
Socio economic Status
Enough up to 12 months                                51(58.1)           37(41.9)       6.954       0.008*
More than 12 months                                   81(75.7)           26(24.3)
Note: *Significance level at ≤ 0.05 at 95% confidence interval **Fisher Exact Test
Table 6 shows that there was statistically                       The present study shows that 86.2% had
significant association between level of                         knowledge on multiple sexual partners, STI
knowledge and age with p value 0.012 and socio-                  (84.1%) and Multiparity (75.4%) and sex at early
economic status with p value 0.008 but other                     age (70.6%) as the causes of cervical cancer The
variable shows insignificant association.                        findings were inconsistent with a study done by
                                                                 Chaudhari, Dutt, Goswami, Roychowdhary14
DISCUSSION                                                       where very few knew about other factors like
The findings of the study revealed that all the                  multiple sexual partner 20% as risk factor.
respondents had heard about cervical cancer.                     Regarding sign and symptom of cervical cancer,
More than half of the respondents (67.7%) had                    majority of the respondents (84.6%) stated that
adequate knowledge regarding cervical cancer                     increased vaginal discharge, post-menopausal
screening and 60% had inadequate practice.                       bleeding (79.5%) and irregular menstruation
This finding is not supported by the literature as               (67.2%) were the symptoms whereas only 33.3%
cited in Singh et al12 which showed 32.7% of the                 respondents were aware of pain during sexual
respondents had adequate knowledge and the                       intercourse is the symptoms of cervical cancer.
practice was supported by the study conducted                    These findings are consistent with study done
by Shrestha and Dhakal13in which 72.2% had                       by Shrestha, Sapkota in Bharatpur, Chitwan15 in
inadequate practice.                                             which 71.3% agreed increased vaginal discharge,
Journal of Nursing Education of Nepal/ 2023 Vol. 14
                                   Knowledge, Attitude and Practice regarding Cervical Cancer...       27
and 60.7% stated post-menopausal bleeding               screening but less than half of the respondents
as symptoms of cervical cancer. Almost all              only practice the cervical cancer screening.
respondent (97.4%) said that early screening            The level of knowledge tends to be associated
as a preventive measure followed by treating            with age of the respondents and their socio-
STI (84.1%), practicing safe sex (69.7%)and             economic status whereas in practice, there was
only 14.8% answered that HPV vaccination can            no association between selected variables.
prevent cervical cancer. About 80% respondent
had knowledge on screening test. This finding           CONFLICT OF INTEREST: NONE
is consistent with the study conducted by               ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Shrestha16 which showed that Pap smear (68.8%)
as the screening test for cervical cancer.              We would like to express our gratitude to hospital
                                                        director and nursing director of the TUTH for
The study revealed that less than half of the           granting permission to collect data. Our heartfelt
respondents (45.6%) had cervical cancer                 thanks go to all participants for giving time to
screening practice. Among them 40.4%                    participate in the study.
respondents had screened in 30-39 years and
almost all (96.6%) had screening within 3 years         REFERENCES
and those who did not screened for cervical             1.     Kieti SN. Knowledge, Attitude and
cancer were due to feeling of being not at risk                Practices on cervical cancer screening and
(60.7%) followed by lack of awareness (27.8%).                 prevention methods among nurses at two
This finding is inconsistent with the study done               Nairobi hospitals in Kenya. University of
by Shrestha16 which revealed that 28.5% only had               South Africa. 2016. https://doi: 10.1097/
                                                               IGC.0b013e31828e425c,. [Pdf]
cervical cancer screening. The most common
reason for participating in cervical cancer             2.     Khatry RA, Joseph B. A study to evaluate
screening was health personnel advice and the                  the effectiveness of self-instructional
most common reason for non-participation was                   module on knowledge regarding Pap
feeling of not being at risk followed by lack of               smear screening among female teachers
                                                               from selected schools of Bangalore. Int J
awareness. This finding is supported by the study              Health Sci Res. 2017; 7(7):171-176.[Pdf]
conducted by Shrestha and Dhakal 13that showed
physicians’ or other health care workers’ advice as     3.     Habtu Y, Yohannes S, & LaelagoT. Healt
reason for participating. Besides this, the present            seeking behavior and its determinants
                                                               for cervical cancer among women of
study reveals all the respondents has positive                 childbearing age in Hossana Town, Hadiya
attitude of screening which was similar to the                 zone, Southern Ethiopia: Community
findings of the study conducted by Bansal, et al               based cross sectional study. BMC Cancer,
17,13
      in which cent percent had favorable attitude.            2018; 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/
The study highlighted that there was a significant             s12885-018-4203-2[Full text]
association between level of knowledge and              4.     Pandey A,      KarmacharyaE. Cervical
respondents’ age (p=0.012) and socio-economic                  cancer screening behavior and associated
status(p=0.008) but no significant association                 factors among women of Ugrachandi
was found between level of practice and selected               Nala, Kavre, Nepal. European Journal of
variables. The findings of this study are not                  Medical Research, 2017; 22(1). https://
                                                               doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0274-9[Full
consistent with a study conducted by Thapa6
                                                               text]
which showed that there was an insignificant
association between level of knowledge and age          5.     Ranjit A, Gupta S, Shrestha R, Kushner
(p=0.366).                                                     AL,    Nwomeh BC. Awareness and
                                                               prevalence of cervical cancer screening
CONCLUSION                                                     among women in Nepal Epub 2016, [Link]
Respondents have adequate knowledge and                 6.     Thapa M. Cervical cancer awareness and
                                                               practice of pap smear test among women
positive attitude on cervical cancer and its
                                                      Journal of Nursing Education of Nepal/ 2023 Vol. 14
28    Biva Shrestha, et al.,
        with gynecological problems. J. Nepal               gynaecology outpatient department in
        Med. Assoc 2018; 56(211), 654–657.                  ESI PGIMSR & ESIC medical college &
        https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.3633[Full             Hospital, Joka, Kolkata.Int J Community
        text]                                               Med Public Health. 2017; 4(4), 1319.
                                                            https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.
7.      RijalS, Rijal, A, Deo, SK. Cervical cancer          ijcmph20171369. [Pdf]
        and its screening: A Cross-Sectional
        Study among Married Women in Sankhu,          15.   Shrestha BK, Sapkota, DK SapkotaM.
        Kathmandu. Birat J. Health Sci. 2019;               Knowledge and Acceptability of Cervical
        ,3(3), 519–523. https://doi.org/10.3126/            Cancer Screening among Adult Women
        bjhs.v3i3.22167,[Pdf]                               Visiting in Gynecological OPD. JCMS-
                                                            Nepal. 2019;15(1), 67–70. DOI: https://
8.      Joshi M, Mishra S. Cervical cancer                  doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v15i1.21128
        screening in Nepal: ethical considerations.
        Health Prospect, 2013;12(1), 18–20.           16.   Shrestha P. Knowledge, attitude, and
        DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/hprospect.             practice regarding Pap smear test among
        v12i1.8723                                          women in ward no. 14, Dharan. 2014.
                                                            https://hdl.handle.net/10037/7995[Pdf]
9.      BobdeyS,        SathwaraJ,       JainA,
        BalasubramaniamG. (2016). Burden of           17.   BansalAB, PakhareAP, Kapoor N,
        cervical cancer and role of screening               Mehrotra R, KokaneAM. Knowledge,
        in India. Indian Journal of Medical                 attitude, and practices related to cervical
        and Paediatric Oncology, 2016; 37(4),               cancer among adult women: A hospital-
        278–285. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-              based cross-sectional study. J Nat Sci
        5851.195751[Full text]                              Biol Med 2015; 6(2), 324–328. https://doi.
                                                            org/10.4103/0976-9668.159993[Full text]
10.     Curry SJ, KristAH, Owens,DK., Barry MJ,
        Caughey, AB, Davidson, KW et al. Screening
        for cervical cancer us preventive services
        task force recommendation statement.
        J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2018;320(7), 674–
        686. [PMID: 30140884]DOI: 10.1001/
        jama.2018.10897
11.     Thapa N, ShresthaG, Maharjan M,
        LindellD, Maskey N, Shah R, LindellD.
        Burden of cervical neoplasia in mid-
        western rural Nepal : A population-based
        study. 2018;29(5), https://doi:10.3802/
        jgo.2018.29.e64[Full text]
12.     Singh, M., Ranjan R, Das B, GuptaK.
        Knowledge, attitude and practice of
        cervical cancer screening in women
        visiting a tertiary care hospital of Delhi,
        https://doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.146780,
        [Full text]
13.     Shrestha S, Dhakal, P. Knowledge, Attitude
        and Practice Regarding Cervical Cancer
        Screening Among Women Attending a
        Teaching Hospital, Bharatpur, Chitwan. J
        Family Reprod Health 2017 11(1), 18–23.
        [Full text]
14.     Chaudhari S, Dutt R, GoswamiS,
        Roychowdhury J. Awareness about
        cervical cancer screening among
        reproductive aged women attending
Journal of Nursing Education of Nepal/ 2023 Vol. 14