CHATGPT AI AND ENGLISH PERFORMANCE OF GRADE 10 STUDENTS AT

SANTISIMO ROSARIO INTEGRATED HIGH SCHOOL

Aguila, Angela kim C.

Baloloy, Prince Felix G.
Beron, Kiel Khester Jhay
De Guia, Hurry P.
Hila, Cris Jordan T.
Dela Peña, Janna Victoria A.
Gerani, Lyka Mae B.
Indiano, Pauline E.

SANTISIMO ROSARIO INTEGRATED HIGH SCHOOL

Santisimo Rosario, San Pablo City

APRIL 2025
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
In recent years, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational

contexts has gained significant momentum, with tools like ChatGPT becoming

increasingly prevalent. ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, is a language model based on

the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture. It is designed to understand

and generate human-like text based on the input it receives. By leveraging a vast

dataset encompassing a wide range of topics, ChatGPT can provide responses that

simulate a conversational partner, offering explanations, answering questions, and

engaging in dialogue on various subjects.

As stated by Atlas (2023), ChatGPT is a conversational AI model designed to

generate human-like text based on the input it receives. Built upon advanced language

processing techniques and large-scale data sets, ChatGPT can engage in a variety of

task, such as providing explanations, answering questions, assisting with writing and

problem solving. Its capabilities make it a versatile tool in educational environments,

where it can act as a tutor, a source of information, and a collaborator in academic

work.

Using ChatGPT is common among students who typically interact with the AI

through a chat interface, as they input text queries or prompts. ChatGPT responds with

text-based answers explanations or suggestions. It can be accessed via various

platforms, including web applications and integrated tools within educational software.

For effective use, students can input specific questions, seek help with homework, or

request classifications on various subjects. The AI’s responses are generated based on
patterns and knowledge divided from its training data, allowing for dynamic and

contextually relevant interactions(Walker, 2022).

While ChatGPT offers numerous educational benefits, it also presents serval

potential drawback. First, reliance on the AI for information and assistance might

diminish student’s critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as they might become

accustomed to seeking quick and was rather than engaging deeply with the material.

Additionally, there is the risks of students encountering incorrect or misleading

information, as the AI’s responses are not infallible and are based on pre-existing data

rather than real time verification. Furthermore, overuse of ChatGPT could lead to

decreased academic integrity, with students potentially using the AI to complete

assignments dishonestly rather than developing their own understanding. Privacy and

data security concerns of personal information, necessitating careful management to

protect students’ data (Gonzales, 2024)

As observed by the researchers, students' in Santisimo Rosario Integrated High

School, started in relying too heavily on ChatGPT AI for their academic needs. Students

can become less critical in their thinking and may not question the information

presented to them by ChatGPT. This can result in students accepting answer even the

given information is incorrect. It can lead to students’ neglecting the development of

crucial problem-solving and critical thinking skills because they use and relying too

much on ChatGPT AI. ChatGPT's ability to generate the text that makes the students to

copy and paste responses without understanding the text. When students rely on

predefined responses generated by ChatGPT, they may struggle to develop their own

ideas and creative problem-solving abilities.

 The pros and cons of the utilization of ChatGPT led the researchers to conduct a

study to understand better its potential effects among students of Santisimo Rosario

Integrated High School. It intended to quantitatively collect students’ experiences and

later on, understand its impact towards their learning.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

This research aimed to determine the effects of ChatGPT AI and English

performance of Grade 10 students at Santisimo Rosario Integrated High School and it

sought to answer the following questions:

1. What are the perceived responses of ChatGPT AI in terms of:

1.1. Accessibility.

1.2. Dependence; and,

1.3. Uniqueness of Answer?

2. What is the English performance of the respondents in 2nd quarter/period?

3. Is there any significant relationship between the effects of ChatGPT AI and

English performance of the respondents?

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

INDEPENDENT VARIABLE DEPENDENT

VARIABLE
Effects of ChatGPT AI in
terms of:
English performance of the
 Accessibility respondents
 Dependence
 Uniqueness of Answer
Figure 1. Relationship between the effects of ChatGPT AI and English performance of
the respondents.

HYPOTHESIS

 There is no significant relationship between the effects of ChatGPT AI and

English performance of the respondents.

SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS

This study focused to prove the effects of ChatGPT AI and English performance

of Grade 10 students. The target respondents belong to any section in Grade 10. The

researchers conducted this study to assess the relationship between ChatGPT AI and

English performance of the respondents. The coverage of this study included validated

questionnaires with three parts that included respondents’ profile, and the questions

about the effects of ChatGPT AI in terms of its accessibility, dependence, uniqueness of

answer and English performance of the respondents. This research was conducted in

the second quarter of the School Year 2024-2025 at Santisimo Rosario Integrated High

School.

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational contexts has gained

significant traction over the past decade, with ChatGPT emerging as a prominent tool

due to its advanced natural language processing capabilities. Since its inception,

ChatGPT has been employed in various educational settings, sparking considerable

interest in understanding its influence on student learning and engagement. This review

explores the existing literature on the impact of ChatGPT AI, focusing specifically on

Grade 10 Students through a Phenomenology lens.

AI applications like ChatGPT have the potential to make people’s lives easier and

help with tedious tasks that are not conducive to intellectual development, such as email

writing and endless web searches. Internet for information. Teachers can use Chat GPT

to promote personalized learning by assigning tailored tasks and deploying them as a

virtual teaching assistant that is always available. This approach boosts student

participation and promotes language learning through interactive conversations.

However, to avoid over-reliance on technology, teachers should maintain human

connections and use Chat GPT as a supplement, not a replacement. They should also

address the potential spread of misinformation by teaching critical thinking and digital

literacy skills. Kemper (2023) emphasized that teachers should share knowledge with

students about AI’s capabilities and potential bias and should emphasize privacy and

data protection by following regulations and obtaining consent. Balancing the positive

and negative aspects of Chat GPT within the classroom is important. By exploiting its

benefits while maintaining human interaction and managing potential concerns,

teachers can build effective, unique, and responsible learning environments for their

students during of AI.

The use of ChatGPT raises serious concerns regarding the future of AI in

education and various industries. Although ChatGPT can create essays, art, participate

in philosophical discussion, and write code for specific tasks, this raises questions

regarding its impact on education (Rege et al., 2023). One of the drawbacks is that it
can hinder students’ writing progress and their skills when they rely on this technology.

Moreover, not all schools and educational programs have modern technology, so it is

difficult to detect when students are using tools like ChatGPT.

According to Grassini (2023), in education, ChatGPT has potential positive

effects, but it is also necessary to remember some important problems associated with

it. One of the main concerns is the uncertainty in the quality of the information it

produces. This is because ChatGPT comes from a vast collection of unstructured and

unsalted data, which can cause errors and does not always provide correct or true

information. This can have serious consequences when students use it in their

schoolwork, as they may not realize that their outputs may contain false information.

Another problem is rooted in the widespread use of Al writing tools such as ChatGPT,

where it causes plagiarism by students. Due to the ease of use of these tools for text

creation, some of the students are led to not properly acknowledge or record their

sources, which casts doubt on the integrity of the educational process. To combat this,

teachers use specialized computer programs to identify cases of plagiarism by

comparing works submitted by students from different sources to identify similarities.

Another major issue is rooted in students using ChatGPT in their assignments,

where they are more likely to use shortcuts that may encourage bad behavior or

academic dishonesty (Grassini, 2023). Due to the tool's ability to produce high-quality

text easily, some students are motivated to take shortcuts or incorrectly copy ideas,

which can have a serious impact on the integrity of academic institutions. It can also

affect the primary purpose of assessments, which aim to identify and reflect real student

learning. Moreover, there is a threat of unfair importance being shown in the field of
education, where students with access to ChatGPT may have an unfair advantage

compared to their fellow students. Such a situation can cause grades and recognition to

be misrepresented in the academic world, taxing hard work and effort in education. To

solve these challenges, meaningful education about the proper use of AI in the field of

education is essential. It is also necessary for teachers to be prepared to find effective

ways to accurately determine student performance, even as the use of AI tools

becomes more widespread, to ensure that the teaching and learning process remains

effective.

As stated by Gonzales (2022) ChatGPT is similar to automated chat services

found on customer service websites, because people can ask questions or request

clarification on ChatGPT’s answers. ChatGPT stands for “Generative pre trained

Transformer which refers to how ChatGPT processes requests and generates

responses. ChatGPT is trained with reinforcement learning through human feedback

models and reward ranking the best responses. This feedback helps ChatGPT in

machine learning to improve future responses. Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT is an

advance technology used mostly by students because it can answer all our questions

so it will be a big help to us because it makes all our answers easier, but it is abused by

most people because they just rely on Al and they no longer give effort and take time in

answering the questions.

Through ChatGPT it can enhance learning, it may also have negative effects.

Over-reliance on AI for personalized learning might reduce critical thinking skills if

students become accustomed to receiving immediate, tailored answers rather than

engaging in problem-solving on their own. There is also a risk of reinforcing biases if the
AI inadvertently provides skewed or incorrect information based on its training data.

Additionally, excessive personalization could lead to a lack of exposure to diverse

perspectives and learning approaches, potentially limiting students' ability to adapt to

varied educational contexts. Furthermore, disparities in access to technology and

internet connectivity could exacerbate existing educational inequalities, making it

challenging for some students to benefit from the personalized support provided by

ChatGPT. It is crucial to address these potential drawbacks by promoting balanced use

of AI and ensuring equitable access to technology.

According to Kamps (2022), ChatGPT works through its generative pre-trained

transformer, experts use algorithms to find patterns within data sequences. ChatGPT

originally uses the GPT-3 large language model, a neutral network machine learning

model and the third-generation generative pre-trained transformer. The transformer

pulls from a significant amount of data to generate a response. Building Al is hard

because it uses an algorithm to find patterns within data sequences so it can answer all

our questions.

While the use of ChatGPT among the students can present several negative

effects. One significant issue is the digital divide, where students from lower socio-

economic backgrounds might lack the necessary technology or internet access to fully

engage with ChatGPT, exacerbating existing educational inequalities. Additionally, while

ChatGPT aims to be inclusive, its effectiveness can be limited for students with specific

disabilities, such as those with severe visual impairments or cognitive challenges, if the

AI is not properly optimized with assistive technologies. The reliance on text-based

interactions might also be a barrier for students who require alternative formats, such as
audio or visual content, to fully understand the material. Moreover, if ChatGPT’s

responses are not sufficiently tailored to meet diverse needs, some students might find

the information less accessible or comprehensible, potentially hindering their learning

experience. Addressing these challenges requires ongoing efforts to ensure that AI

tools are designed with accessibility in mind and that all students have equitable

opportunities to benefit from such technologies. (Gonzales, 2022).

The positive impact was evident in students’ achievements in terms of generation

of focused ideas, better connection among ideas and sentences, and improved

grammatical accuracy, which were also claimed by previous researchers (Allagui, 2023;

Kohnke et al., 2023; Su et al., 2023; Wang & Guo, 2023).

The use of ChatGPT and other AI technologies has a profound impact on the

English performance of students. On the positive side, students have immediate access

to information, explanations and essays on their English subjects, which accelerates

their learning and expands their knowledge. These tools can help better understand

some differ English words, do better research, and perform their English tasks faster.

On the other hand, over-reliance on AI can pose some challenges. This may

result in a decrease in students’ ability to think critically and solve problems on their

own. Constantly relying on ChatGPT AI for quick answers and solutions can lead to a

lack of training of their own thinking and creative skills. Proper use and training are

therefore essential to ensure that students are not only dependent on technology but

actively contributing to their learning and development. In additional, it can affect the

English performance of students, because It can cause a bad effect on their English

performance because of the cheating they are doing.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This study used correlation research as its research design. According to ( MoCombes, 2019),

"a correlation research design measures a relationship between two variables without the

researcher controlling either of them."

The researcher used correlation research design since this research aimed to

investigate the correlation between ChatGPT AI and English Performance of Grade 10 students

in Santisimo Rosario Integrated High School. A quantitative correlation design was

employed,utilizing questionnaires to gather data on the effects of ChatGPT AI on its

accessibility, dependence, and personalization. The tool intended to gather also students

grades. Data analysis involved calculating correlation coefficients to determine and stored

securely, with only aggregated results reported. The study ensured ethical standards by

obtaining informed consent from the subjects and their guardians, ensuring voluntary

involvement, and Addressing any potential biases in the study 's implementation and analysis.

SAMPLES AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUE

This study was focused on identifying the relationship between ChatGPT A.I and English

performance at Santisimo Rosario Integrated High School. The simple random sampling was

utilized to obtain samples from 68 Grade 10 in any section.

RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

This research used questionnaires – checklist to gather necessary data about using

ChatGPT A.I and English Performance of Grade 10 students in terms of accessibility,

dependence and Uniqueness of Answer. The researchers conducted face-to-face survey

questionnaires, these questionnaires have 3 parts, in the part 1 is the respondents profile, in the

part 2 likert scale was used in the check list where the following numerical value was given the

respective equivalent ; 4-strongly agree, 3-agree, 2-disagree, 1-strongly disagree, then the part
3 requires the respondents to write their grade in English to identify the respondents English

Performance during the second quarter of SY 2024-2025.

RESEARCH PROCEDURE

To collect the necessary data for this study, the research used validated questionnaires

to 68 students that are using ChatGPT A.I. The 68 respondents are from Grade 10 Students,

who are specifically using ChatGPT A.I.

As the questionnaires were distributed, the participants were asked to sign a consent

from their understanding that their answers would remain confidential and private. Participants

under the age of eighteen were asked to confirm their agreement to participate in the study by

getting their parents signature. Before responding to the questions, researchers explained the

instructions to the respondents and also the researchers goal for this study. After obtaining the

data from the chosen respondents, the researchers examined the findings to ensure that every

questions was addressed without any missing information.

STATISTICAL TREATMENT

The research used mean to recognize the sum of the scores from the questionnaires. To

measure the spread of the data about the mean, the researchers used standard deviation. The

respondents English Performance were summarized through percentage to analyze the

relationship between independent and dependent variables, Pearson – r was used.

PRESENTATION, INTERPRETATION, AND ANALYSIS OF DATA

TABLE I. THE PERCEIVED RESPONSES OF CHATGPT AI IN TERMS OF

ACCESSIBILITY

INDICATORS MEAN SD INTERPRETATION

 1. I am able to search any answer to 2.94 0.65 AGREE

my activities.

2. I can easily access ChatGPT 2.78 0.62 AGREE

whenever I need it.

3. I find it convenient to use ChatGPT 2.75 0.70 AGREE

when studying.

4. I often use ChatGPT to clarify AGREE

concepts I don’t understand in class.

2.82 0.70

5. I can access ChatGPT from multiple 2.47 0.80 AGREE

devices without issues.

TOTAL 2.75 0.07 AGREE

Legend: 1.00-1.74 “Strongly Disagree”, 1.75-2.29 “Disagree”, 2.50-3.24 “Agree”, 3.25-

4.00 “Strongly Agree”.

Based on the table (The perceived responses of ChatGPT AI in terms of

accessibility ), on the Statement 1 ( I am able to search any answer to my activities)

gained a total mean score of 2.94 and a total SD score of 0.65, which means Agree. On

the Statement 2 (I can easily access ChatGPT whenever I need it) gained a total means

score of 2.78 and a total SD of 0.62 which mean Agree. On the Statement 3 (I find it

convenient to use ChatGPT when studying) gained a total means score of 2.75 and a

SD of 0.70 which means Agree. On the Statement 4 (I often use ChatGPT to clarify

concepts I don’t understand in class) gained a total means score of 2.82 and a SD
score of 0.70, which means Agree. Lastly, on the Statement 5 (I can access ChatGPT

from multiple devices without issues) gained a total means score of 2.47 and a SD

score of 0.80, which means Agree.

The overall result of the perceived responses of ChatGPT AI in terms of

accessibility obtained a total mean score of 2.75,and a total SD score of 0.07, and an

interpretation of Agree. This means that Grade 10 Students who using ChatGPT agreed

that using ChatGPT in searching answers for their schoolworks is easy. This also

means that ChatGPT is effective in facilitating quick and accurate answers to the

respondents.

The result of this table supports the study of Gelan (2022), which proves that

ChatGPT AI had an impact on the student’s academic learning.

TABLE 2. THE PERCEIVED RESPONSES OF CHATGPT AI IN TERMS OF

DEPENDENCE

INDICATORS MEAN SD INTERPRETATION

 1. I rely on ChatGPT to help me 2.54 0.95 AGREE

complete my assignment.

2. I feel that my academic performance 2.40 0.88 AGREE

depends on using ChatGPT.

3. I often use ChatGPT instead of 2.46 0.89 AGREE

studying on my own.

4. I consult ChatGPT frequently for help AGREE

with projects and homeworks.

2.60 0.85

5. I find it difficult to complete tasks 2.43 0.98 AGREE

without using ChatGPT.

TOTAL 2.49 0.05 AGREE

Legend: 1.00-1.74 “Strongly Disagree”, 1.75-2.29 “Disagree”, 2.50-3.24 “Agree”, 3.25-

4.00 “Strongly Agree”.

Based on the table (The perceived responses of ChatGPT AI in terms of

dependence), on the Statement 1 (I rely on ChatGPT to help me complete my

assignment) ) gained a total mean score of 2.54 and a total SD score of 0.95, which

means Agree. On the Statement 2 (I feel that my academic performance depends on

using ChatGPT) gained a total means score of 2.40 and a total SD of 0.88, which mean

Agree. On the Statement 3 ( I often use ChatGPT instead of studying on my own )

gained a total means score of 2.46 and a SD score of 0.89, which means Agree. On the

Statement 4 (I consult ChatGPT frequently for help with projects and homeworks)
gained a total means score of 2.60 and a SD score of 0.85, which means Agree. Lastly,

on the Statement 5 (I find it difficult to complete tasks without using ChatGPT) gained a

total means score of 2.43 and a SD score of 0.98, which means Agree.

The overall result of the perceived responses of ChatGPT AI in terms of

dependence obtained a total mean score of 2.49, and a total SD score of 0.05, and an

interpretation of Agree. This implied that Grade 10 Students who using ChatGPT

agreed that the students are always depends in ChatGPT for finding answers for their

schoolwork.

Table 2 supports the study of Gonzales, (2022), that the use of ChatGPT

influence over reliance on AI.

TABLE 3. THE PERCEIVED RESPONSES OF CHATGPT AI IN TERMS OF

UNIQUENESS OF ANSWER

INDICATORS MEAN SD INTERPRETATION

 1. The answer I got from ChatGPT is AGREE

more unique than other app or sources.

2.51 0.91

2. The answers that ChatGPT gave me AGREE

is more accurate answers.

2.59 0.85

3. The information provided by AGREE

ChatGPT is more relevant to my

2.53 0.84
personal context than that from other

sources.

4. I feel that ChatGPT understands my AGREE

preferences better than other

2.56 0.82
applications do.

5. Compared to other AI tools, AGREE

ChatGPT offers responses that are

2.60 0.81
more diverse and creative.

TOTAL 2.56 0.04 AGREE

Legend: 1.00-1.74 “Strongly Disagree”, 1.75-2.29 “Disagree”, 2.50-3.24 “Agree”, 3.25-

4.00 “Strongly Agree”.

Based on the table (The perceived responses of ChatGPT AI in terms of

Uniqueness of Answer), on the Statement 1 (The answer I got from ChatGPT is more

unique than other app or sources) gained a total mean score of 2.51 and a total SD

score of 0.91, which means Agree. On the Statement 2 (The answers that ChatGPT
gave me is more accurate answers) gained a total means score of 2.59 and a total SD

of 0.85, which mean Agree. On the Statement 3 (The information provided by ChatGPT

is more relevant to my personal context than that from other sources) gained a total

means score of 2.53 and a SD score of 0.84, which means Agree. On the Statement 4

(I feel that ChatGPT understands my preferences better than other applications do)

gained a total means score of 2.56 and a SD score of 0.82, which means Agree. Lastly,

on the Statement 5 (Compared to other AI tools, ChatGPT offers responses that are

more diverse and creative) gained a total means score of 2.60 and a SD score of 0.81,

which means Agree.

The overall result of the perceived responses of ChatGPT AI in terms of

ununiqueness of answer obtained a total mean score of 2.56, and a total SD score of

0.04, and an interpretation of Agree. This implied that the answers from ChatGPT AI is

more unique than other AI tools.

This table has the exact opposite results as compared to the study conducted by

Grassini(2023) states that ChatGPT makes errors and does not always provide correct

or true information like other tools.

TABLE 4. ENGLISH PERFORMANCE

GRADES FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

 95-100 11 13%

94-90 16 27%

89-85 15 23%

84-80 13 19%

79-75 11 13%

75 - below 3 5%

TOTAL 69 100%

Based on Table 4. (English Performance), the grades 95-100 gained a frequency

of 11 and a percentage of 13%, meaning that there are 11 students who are excellent in

English subject that are using ChatGPT AI. The grades 94-90 got a frequency of 16 and

a percentage of 27%, this means that there are 16 respondents who are also excellent

in English subject that are using ChatGPT. This indicates that most of the respondents

have average English performance. The grades 89-85 got a frequency of 15 and a

percentage of 23%, this means that there are 15 respondents who are using ChatGPT

for their English subjects. The grades 84-80 got a frequency of 13 and a percentage of

19%, also this means that there are 13 respondents who are using ChatGPT. Also, the

grades 79-75 got 11 frequency and 13% of the respondents who are using ChatGPT.

The grades 75 and below got a frequency of 3 and a percentage of 5%, this means that

there are some of respondents got a lower grade are using ChatGPT.
 All of this indicates that most respondents who are using ChatGPT have a

passing grade in English.

TABLE 5. CHATGPT AI AND ENGLISH PERFORMANCE OF GRADE 10 STUDENTS

VARIABLES R-VALUE P-VALUE VERBAL

INTERPRETATION
ACCESSIBILITY -0.009 0.942 Not Significant

DEPENDENCE 0.257 0.034 Significant

UNIQUENESS OF ANSWER 0.053 0.668 Not Significant

LEGEND: p>0.05 = NS, p<0.05= S

The table above shows the relationship between ChatGPT AI and English

performance of the respondents. Variables Accessibility and English Performance

gained an r-value of, - 0.009 and p-value of 0.942, which means that there is no

significant relationship between the two variables. Dependence and English

Performance got an r-value of 0.257 and p-value of 0.034 – therefore there is a

significant relationship between the two variables. Lastly, the variables Uniqueness of

Answer and English Performance, which was shown to be not significant because it got

an r-value of 0.053 and p-value of 0.668.

This means that there is no significant relationship in the two variables:

accessibility and uniqueness of answer. Meanwhile, the dependence shown that there

is a significant relationship between ChatGPT AI and English performance of the

respondents.
 This implies that using ChatGPT could potentially help the respondents in their

English subject to enhance their English performance. However, ChatGPT ‘s

accessibility and its Uniqueness of answer may not have a significant impact on English

performance of the respondents.

This table supports the study of (Alaoui, 2023; Kohnke et al., 2023; Su et al.,

2023; Wang & Guo, 2023). The positive impact was evident in students’ achievements

in terms of generation of focused ideas, better connection among ideas and sentences,

and improved grammatical accuracy, which were also claimed by previous researchers.

CONCLUSION

1. Based on the data, the respondents agree that they used ChatGPT AI for

accessibility. On the dependence, the students agreed that they always rely on

ChatGPT AI to search answers and to complete their tasks. In the uniqueness of

answer, the students agreed that the answers provided by ChatGPT AI are more

unique than other AI tools.

2. In the English performance, 94 to 90 got the highest frequency of grades, which

means that most of the respondents who are using ChatGPT AI excel in English

subjects.

3. The relationship between the effects of ChatGPT AI and English performance of

the respondents resulted to not significant relationship in two variables the

accessibility and uniqueness of answer in English performance of the

respondents. While the one dependence shows a significant relationship in the

effects of ChatGPT AI and English performance of the respondents. This makes

the null hypothesis partially accepted. Chat GPT AI can potentially aid students in
 enhancing student’s performance in English. However, these AI tools must be

used appropriately to avoid over-dependence among students

RECOMMENDATION

1. The researchers recommend teachers and parents to constantly guide students

in the appropriate use of AI tools for students

2. The researchers suggest that the students can explore other means and ways in

improving their English performance – not solely by AI.

3. The researcher suggests that the students should limit the dependence on the

use of AI tools like ChatGPT on answering tasks. Teachers should supervise and

catch the attention of students who keeps on relying on ChatGPT for the finding

answers.

4. Future studies should be further explored on the potential pros and cons of AI in

the education sector.

REFERENCES

https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-024-00322-9

Shoufan, A. (2023). Exploring Students’ Perceptions of CHATGPT: Thematic Analysis

and Follow-Up Survey. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3268224

An, X., Chai, C. S., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Shen, X., Zheng, C., & Chen, M. (2023). Modeling

English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools.

Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5187–5208.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11286-z

Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). An expectancy value theory (EVT) based instrument

for measuring student perceptions of generative AI. Smart Learning Environments,

10(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00284-4

Chan, S. J., Nong, T. X., & Nguyen, T. T. T. (2023). Students’ online learning adoption

during an emergency situation: Integrating the self-determination and perceived risk

theories. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6128584

https://www.scribd.com/document/700205839/EPEKTO-NG-PAGGAMIT-NG-

CHATGPT-SA-AKADEMIKONG-PAGGANAP-NG-MGA-MAG

https://www.collegesidekick.com/study-docs/1166122

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Veronica-Salido/publication/

376260972_Impact_of_AI-

Powered_Learning_Tools_on_Student_Understanding_and_Academic_Performance/

links/6570801c8cfa3a5b120515cd/Impact-of-AI-Powered-Learning-Tools-on-Student-

Understanding-and-Academic-Performance.pdf

https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/4/410#B79-education-13-00410
https://www.collegesidekick.com/study-docs/1166122

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Veronica-Salido/publication/

376260972_Impact_of_AI-

Powered_Learning_Tools_on_Student_Understanding_and_Academic_Performance/

links/6570801c8cfa3a5b120515cd/Impact-of-AI-Powered-Learning-Tools-on-Student-

Understanding-and-Academic-Performance.pdf

https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/4/410#B79-education-13-00410

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial

intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching

and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500

Daneji, A. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Khambari, M. N. M. (2019). The effects of perceived

usefulness, confirmation and satisfaction on continuance intention in using massive

open online course (MOOC). Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 11(2), 201–214.

https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.010

Horowitz, M. C., & Kahn, L. (2021). What influences attitudes about artificial intelligence

adoption: Evidence from US local officials. PLoS ONE, 16(10), e0257732.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257732

Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., &

Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges,

and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching.

https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29

Shaengchart, Y., Bhumpenpein, N., Kongnakorn, K., Khwannu, P., Tiwtakul, A., &

Detmee, S. (2023). Factors influencing the acceptance of ChatGPT usage among

higher education students in Bangkok, Thailand. Advance Knowledge for Executives,

2(4), 1–14.