0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views7 pages

School Harassment Test

This document describes the Cisneros Autotest for Bullying, a scale to assess the overall index of bullying in children. It consists of 50 items with three response options. It measures 8 components of bullying grouped into subscales. It was developed in Spain in 2005 and has good validity and reliability. It provides overall scores and by subscales to categorize the degree of reported bullying.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views7 pages

School Harassment Test

This document describes the Cisneros Autotest for Bullying, a scale to assess the overall index of bullying in children. It consists of 50 items with three response options. It measures 8 components of bullying grouped into subscales. It was developed in Spain in 2005 and has good validity and reliability. It provides overall scores and by subscales to categorize the degree of reported bullying.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

THE CISNEROS AUTOTEST OF SCHOOL BULLYING

I. TECHNICAL SHEET:

Name Cisneros Autotest of school bullying


Origin Spain
Author Iñaki Piñuel and Araceli Oñate
Institute of Educational Innovation and Executive Development
Year 2005
Administration Individual–Collective
Application time: 30 minutes 2

II. OBJECTIVES
This scale evaluates the Global School Harassment Index. It is divided into 8 components.

III. CHARACTERISTICS:
Itisascalemadeupof50items,statedinafirmativeformandwithresponseoptions.
(Never),(Rarely),(Often)Scoresareassigned1,2,3.
It is made up of 10 sub-scales that are described below:

THE GLOBAL HARASSMENT INDEX (M).


Represented by the sum of the direct scores of the entire scale.

HARASSMENT INTENSITY SCALE (I).


Thisscaleisobtainedbyadding1pointeachtimebetweenquestions1and50thechild
you have selected the answer 3 (3 = many times)

COMPONENTS:

A) DISDAIN – RIDICULING
Thisareagroupsitemsofbulyingthataimtodistortthesocialimageof
childandtherelationshipofotherswithhim.Withthem,itisaboutpresentinganegativeimage,
distortedandnegativelychargedaboutthechild.Nomaterwhatthechilddoes,everythingis
usedandservestoinducetherejectionofothers.Becauseofthismanipulationoftheimage
fromthebuliedchild,manyotherchildrenjointhegangorcircleofbulyinginaway
involuntary.

B)COERCION
Groupthosebehaviorsofschoolharassmentthataimforthechildtotakeactions.
againsthiswil.Throughthesebehaviors,thosewhoharassthechildintendtoexert
dominion and a total submission of their wil.Those who harass are perceived as
powerful for the victim and the benefit is the social power of the hunter.

C) RESTRICTION - COMMUNICATION
Grouptheactionsofbulyingthataimtosocialyblockthechild.Thus,the
prohibitionsonplayinginagroup,talkingorcommunicatingwithothers,oranyonespeaking
orisrelatedtohim,areindicatorsthatpointtoanatempttobreakthesocialnetworkof
children's supports.

D)AGGRESSIONS
Groupthedirectbehaviorsofaggression,whetherphysicalorpsychological.Thisisascalethat
evaluates the most direct violence against the child, although this is not always more
psychologically harmful. Physical aggression, violence, theft, or intentional damage
Thecriesandinsultsareindicatorsofthisscale.

E) INTIMIDATION-THREATS
Groupthosebehaviorsofbulyingthatseektointimidate,frighten,overshadowor
emotionalyconsumethechildthroughanintimidatingaction.Withthem,thosewho
Theyseektoinducefearinthechild.Theirindicatorsareactsofintimidation,
threat,intimidatingphysicalharassmentandbulyingattheendofclass.Oritmayevenbe
manifesting threats against the victim's family.

F) EXCLUSION-SOCIAL BLOCKING
Group the bulying behaviors that aim to exclude the child from participation.
Harassed.
The 'you', is the center of these behaviors with which the group that harasses segregates.
socialy to the child. By ignoring him, treating him as if he didnt' exist, isolating him, preventing his
expression, preventing their participation in games, creates the social void in their environment.
G) VERBAL HARASSMENT
Groupthosebehaviorsofbulyingthatconsistofharassmentactionsand
psychologicalharassmentthatexpressesdisdainandlackofrespectandconsiderationfor
dignity of the child. The contempt, the hate, the ridicule, the mockery, the disdain, the...
nicknamesoraliases,malice,thegesturalmanifestationofdisdain,andimitation
burlesque the indicators of this scale.

H) ROBOTS
Groupthosebulyingbehaviorsthatconsistofactionsofappropriationofthe
belongings of the victim can be directly formed by blackmail.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CORRECTION
ForthegradingcriteriaoftheCisnerosSelf-testonBulying,onemustfolowthe
next procedure:

GLOBAL HARASSMENT INDEX (M)


ToobtainthedirectscoreontheMscale,youmustaddthescoreobtainedbetween
questions1to50
1 point has selected the answer Never (1-Never)
2 points have selected the answer Rarely (2-Rarely)
3pointsifyouselectedtheanswerManytimes(3-Manytimes)Youmustobtaina
index between 50 and 150 points

INTENSITY SCALE OF HARASSMENT (I)


Toobtainthedirectscoreofthescale,youshouldaddonepointeachtimeyougothroughthe
Questions1and50thechildhasselectedanswer3(3-Often)Mustobtaina
index from 1 to 50 points

SCALES A – H
Movethecorrespondingnumberforeachonetotheblankspacesontherightofthetest.
the questions from 1 to 50. Sum the scores by columns to obtain
ThedirectscoringofeachscaleDependingoneachscale,youwilobtainindicators
diferente.g.OntheAscaleyoumustobtainascorebetween19and51pointsandsoon
successively.

FOR ALL SCALES


Transformdirectscoringwiththehelpoftherubric.Itcanberepresentedgraphicaly.
theresultintheprofilesheetstoseethelevelsofbulying.
RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE CISNEROS SELF-TEST ON BULLYING
InTablefive,thereliabilityestimatesarepresentedusingthecoeficientsof
internalconsistencyobtainedfromasampleof261studentsofbothgenders;
usingCronbachs' Alphaforthis.Ascanbeseen,theAlphavaluesof
Cronbachshowsthateachofthecomponentsexhibitsgoodhomogeneity.
evidencing the existence of a high internal consistency.

Table 5
Consistency in the internal indicator by Cronbach's Alpha (N=261)

CONSTRUCT VALIDITY THROUGH THE SUBTEST-TEST ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE


InTablesix,theresultsofconstructvalidityarepresentedbythemethodof
itemanalysis.Thismethodaimstoestimatethedegreetowhicheachcomponent
contributestothevalidityoftheinstrumenttowhichitbelongs.Inthisway,itisverifiedthatthe
instrumentmeasureswhatitsaystomeasure.Ascanbeseen,thecorrelationindices
Subtest-test are significant (taking as acceptance criteria, correlations with
significance dp<0.05), it turns out that all correlation coefficients are
significant and are greater than 0.30. Therefore, it can be stated that the analyses
Executedevidencethevalidityoftheconstructoftheself-testofschoolharassment.
STANDARDS FOR THE GRADING OF THE SCHOOL BULLYING SELF-TEST
To establish the categorical levels, presence of lesser or greater degree of harassment
schooling among the students of the educational institution 'EE.UU' in Comas and, in order to classify and
interpreting the direct scores obtained in the school bullying scale (Self-test), it has been estimated the
distributionofdirectscoresbasedonpercentilevalues.Thiscategorizationis
It is carried out taking into account the original assessment method of the instrument, which is
designed to establish the level of bullying

Table seven presents the percentile norms of the school bullying scale for
the school population of the "EE.UU" school in the Comas district. In the very low category,
lowandalmostlowaretheresultsofthesubjectsinthelowerthird(percentiles1to
40),inthemiddlecategoryarethescoresofcasesthatoccupythecentralthirdofa
normaldistribution(percentiles41to60),andinthecategoryofalmosthigh,high,andveryhighareincluded
scores of the upper third (percentiles 61 to 99).

You might also like