ETAG006 2fin
ETAG006 2fin
This ETAG provides guidance on the assessment of a family of Systems of mechanically fastened
flexible roof waterproofing membranes (MEFAWAME) and their intended uses. It is the
manufacturer or producer who defines the kit for which he is seeking an ETA and how it is to be
used in the works, and consequently the scale of the assessment.
It is therefore possible that for some MEFAWAME, which are fairly conventional, only some of the
tests and corresponding criteria are sufficient to establish fitness for use. In other cases, e.g.
special or innovative kits or materials, or where there is a range of uses, the whole package of
tests and assessment may be applicable.
The assessment of the fitness of MEFAWAME with regard to their fitness for intended use in
construction works is a process with three main steps:
   - Chapter 4 clarifies the specific requirements for the works relevant to the MEFAWAME
         and uses
     concerned, beginning with the Essential Requirements for works (CPD art. 11.2) and then
     listing the corresponding relevant characteristics of the MEFAWAME
   - Chapter 5 extends the list in chapter 4 into more precise definitions and the methods
         available
     to verify product characteristics and to indicate how the requirements and the relevant
     product characteristics are described. This is done by test procedures, methods of
     calculation and of proof, etc
   - Chapter 6 provides guidance on the assessing and judging methods to confirm fitness
         for the
     intended use of the MEFAWAME
   - Chapter 7, assumptions and recommendations are only relevant in as so far they
         concern the
     basis upon which the assessment of the MEFAWAME is made concerning the fitness for the
     intended use
According to the CPD, “Classes” in this ETA refer only to mandatory levels or classes laid down
in the EC-mandate.
This ETAG indicates however the compulsory way of expressing relevant performance
characteristics for the MEFAWAME. If, for some uses at least one Member State has no
regulations, a manufacturer always has the right to opt out one or more of them, in which case
the ETA will state “no performance determined” against that aspect, except for those properties
for which, when no determination has been made, the MEFAWAME does not any longer fall under
the scope of this Guideline.
The provisions, test and assessment methods in this ETAG or referred to have been written
based on the assumption that the estimated working life of the product for the intended use is at
least 10 years, provided that the product is subjected to normal use and maintenance. These
provisions are based upon the current state of art and the available knowledge and experience.
                                      Page 15
                                      ETAG 006
An “assumed intended working life” means that it is expected that, when an assessment following the ETAG
        provisions is made, and when this working life has elapsed, the real working life may be, in normal
        use conditions, considerably longer without major degradation affecting the Essential
        Requirements.
        The indication given as to the working life of a product cannot be interpreted as a guarantee
        given by the producer or the approval body. They should be regarded as a means for the
        specifiers to choose the appropriate criteria for products in relation to the expected economically
        reasonable working life of the works (based upon ID. par. 5.2.2).
        Many systems may have a working life well in excess of 10 years but higher working lives are not
        part of the assessments in this ETAG. Claims for longer working lives shall be verified
        independently by a special procedure according to the Construction Products Directive art. 9.2.
        According to the CPD it has to be understood that within the terms of this ETAG, products shall
        “have such characteristics that the works in which they are to be incorporated, assembled, applied
        or installed, can if properly designed and built, satisfy the Essential Requirements” (CPD art. 2.1)
        Hence, the MEFAWAME must be suitable for use in construction works which (as a whole and in
         their separate parts) are fit for their intended use, account being taken of economy, and in order
        to satisfy the Essential Requirements. Such requirements must, subject to normal maintenance,
        be satisfied for an economically reasonable working life. The requirements generally concern
        actions which are foreseeable (CPD, Annex I, preamble).
                                               Page 16
                                               ETAG 006
4.        REQUIREMENTS
4.0       General
          This chapter sets out the aspects of performance to be examined in order to satisfy the relevant
          Essential Requirements for Systems for mechanically fastened flexible roof waterproofing
          membranes, by:
              - expressing in more detail, within the scope of the Guideline, the relevant Essential
                   Requirements
                of the CPD, in the Interpretative Documents and in the mandate, for works or parts of the
                works, taking into account the actions to be considered, as well as the expected durability
                and serviceability of the works
              - applying them to the scope of the Guideline (product and where appropriate its constituents,
                components and intended uses), and providing a list of relevant product characteristics and
                other applicable properties.
          When a product characteristic or other applicable property is specific to one of the Essential
          Requirements, it is dealt with in the appropriate place, If, however, the characteristic or property
          is relevant to more than one Essential Requirement, it is addressed under the most important one
          with cross reference to the other(s). This is especially important where a manufacturer claims “No
          performance determined” for a characteristic or property under one Essential Requirement and
          it is critical for the assessing and judging under another Essential Requirement. Similarly,
          characteristics or properties which have a bearing on durability assessments may be dealt with
          under ER 1 to ER 6, with reference under 4.7. Where there is a characteristic which only relates
          to durability, this is dealt with in 4.7.
          This chapter also takes into account further requirements, if any (e.g. resulting from other EC
          Directives) and identifies aspects of serviceability including specifying characteristics needed to
          identify the products (re. ETA-format par. II.2.).
          The relevant Essential Requirements, the relevant paragraphs of the corresponding IDs and the
          related requirements to product performances are indicated in Table 1:
          Table 1. Link between the mandate, the IDs and the related requirements to product
      performance
                                 -                            -                            -                 -
              1
                                                       Page 17
                                                       ETAG 006
4   § 3.3.1.2                   § 3.3.1.3                Slipperiness         Slipperiness
    Falling after slipping      Falling after slipping
                                   Page 18
                                   ETAG 006
          5                     -                          -                   -                     -
Not relevant.
The Essential Requirement laid down in the C OUNCIL D IRECTIVE 89/106/EEC is as follows:
The construction works must be designed and built in such a way that in the event of an outbreak of fire:
- the load bearing capacity of the construction can be assumed for a specific period of time.
- the generation and spread of fire and smoke within the works are limited.
      The following aspects of performance are relevant to this Essential Requirement for Systems of
      mechanically fastened flexible roof waterproofing membranes:
      The requirements for the external fire performance of the mechanically fastened flexible roof
      waterproofing kits shall be in accordance with laws, regulations and administrative provisions,
      applicable for the location where the product is incorporated in the works and will be specified via
      the CEN classification documents.
Reaction to fire
      Requirements for the reaction to fire of the components of the kits will be specified via the relevant
      CEN document and shall be in accordance with law, regulations and administrative provisions,
      applicable to the end use.
      The Essential Requirement laid down in the C OUNCIL D IRECTIVE 89/106/EEC is as follows:
      The construction work must be designed and built in such a way that it will not be a threat to the hygiene
      or health of the occupants or neighbours, in particular as a result of any of the following:
                                                    Page 19
                                                    ETAG 006
-             the giving-off of toxic gases
- the presence of damp in parts of the works or on surfaces within the works.
          The following aspects of performance are relevant to this Essential Requirement for Systems of
          mechanically fastened flexible roof waterproofing membranes:
          All materials and associated ancillary components of the roof covering shall be such that there
          will be no threat to the health of the occupants when the product is in service as a result of:
- vapour permeability
- water tightness
          Systems of mechanically fastened flexible roof waterproofing membranes shall have sufficient
          strength so they will not be a threat to the hygiene or health of the occupants.
          This means that they shall have sufficient strength to withstand accidentally large static and
          dynamic loads from the action of persons or objects and to withstand the static or dynamic loads
          from the fastening system without rupture of the membrane causing damp to penetrate the
          structure.
- loads on joints and fasteners from snow, traffic, standing water etc.
Outdoor environment:
          Installation and construction works shall not release pollutants to the immediate environment (air,
          soil, water).
          The rate of release of pollutants to outdoor air, soil and water for building materials for roofs shall
          therefore be in accordance with laws, regulations and administrative provisions, applicable for the
          location where the product is incorporated in the works.
The Essential Requirement laid down in the C OUNCIL D IRECTIVE 89/106/EEC is as follows:
                                                       Page 20
                                                       ETAG 006
            The construction works must be designed and built in such a way that it does not present
      unacceptable risks of accidents in service or in operation such as slipping, falling, collision, burns,
      electrocution, injury from explosion.
      The following aspects of performance are relevant to this Essential Requirement for Systems of
      mechanically fastened flexible roof waterproofing membranes:
Slipperiness
      The surface of the mechanically fastened flexible roof waterproofing membrane shall not be
      slippery due to either the inherent surface conditions or the presence of water or grease on
      the surface so that it will influence the probability of falling after slipping and thereby causing a
      risk for the occupants.
      The systems of mechanically fastened flexible roof waterproofing membranes shall have sufficient
      strength to withstand the dynamic loads caused by wind loads without failure of the system in the
      form of:
- loosening of junction between fastener shaft and load-bearing structure (lifting movement)
c) Joints
d) Membrane
Not relevant.
The Essential Requirement laid down in the C OUNCIL D IRECTIVE 89/106/EEC is as follows:
                                              Page 21
                                              ETAG 006
The construction works and its heating and ventilation installations must be designed and built in such a way that
        the amount of energy required in use shall be low, having regard to the climatic conditions of the location
        and the occupants.
         The following aspects of performance are relevant to this Essential Requirement for systems of
         mechanically fastened flexible roof waterproofing membranes:
         -   control water vapour condensing within the roof as a result of cold bridges from the metallic
             fasteners
Water vapour permeability is also related to ID3 and has therefore already been dealt with.
         The requirements considered in the following are those which are related to the Essential
         Requirements, but not to any one in particular. As a consequence, failure to meet these
         requirements means that one or more of the Essential Requirements can no longer be met.
Dimensional stability
         The mechanically fastened flexible roof waterproofing membrane including the system of fastening
         shall have sufficient dimensional stability in order to prevent reduction of mechanical or other
         properties.
Resistance to deterioration
         Roof coverings shall have an adequate resistance to deterioration caused by physical or chemical
         agents in order to prevent reduction of mechanical or other properties. The agents include:
Physical agents
         -   cyclic movement
         -   effect of high/low temperature
         -   effect of UV radiation
         -   ageing
Chemical agents
         Water, carbon dioxide, oxygen (possible corrosion), sodium chloride solution (NaCl), saturated
         limewater (Ca(OH) 2), sulphuric acid solution (H2SO 4) and other normal chemical hazards, e.g. as
         mentioned for bituminous membranes in prEN WI 000254041, Annex C, likely to come into
         contact.
                                                    Page 22
                                                    ETAG 006
Page 23
ETAG 006
5.    METHODS OF VERIFICATION
5.0   General
      Chapter 5 refers to the verification methods used to determine the various aspects of
      performance of the products in relation to the requirements for the works (calculations, tests,
      engineering knowledge, site experience, etc.).
      The relevant Essential Requirements, the related requirements to product performance (as given
      in chapter 4), the corresponding product characteristics to be assessed and the corresponding
      verification methods are indicated in the Table 2.
      The possibility exists to use existing data in accordance with the EOTA Guidance Document on
      The Provision of Data for Assessments Leading to ETA.
      The parts of Table 2 which are accentuated by “bold” framing indicate the minimum testing
      necessary to obtain an ETA for a kit (or a component as part of a kit), provided the
      characteristics of the membrane and insulation are given by CE marking based on other
      European technical specifications (see art 5.2).
                                                   Page 24
                                                   ETAG 006
           § 5.3.4   MECHANICAL FASTENERS
Page 25
ETAG 006
            6    § 4.6                                                    § 5.4.6   INSULATION
                 Thermal resistance
                                                                          § 5.4.6.1 Calculation or testing of thermal
                                                                                    transmission
            *)   § 4.7                                                    § 5.2.7 MEMBRANE
                 Dimensional stability
                 Resistance to deterioration                              § 5.2.7.1 Testing of peel resistance after
                 caused by                                                          long term exposure to heat and
                 -    physical agents                                               water*)
                 -    chemical agents                                     § 5.2.7.2 Testing of shear resistance
                                                                                    after long term exposure to
                                                                                    heat and water*)
                                                                          § 5.2.7.3 Resistance to tear after long
                                                                                    term exposure to heat *)
                                                                          § 5.2.7.4 Resistance to cold
                                                                                    bending/folding after long term
                                                                                    exposure to heat, UV, water
                                                                                    and ozone
                                                                          § 5.2.7.5 Determination of dimensional
                                                                                    stability
                                                                          § 5.3.7 MECHANICAL FASTENERS
5.1 SYSTEM
Not relevant
          Testing of the system including the expression of results (possible classification included) with
          respect to external fire performance is performed as described in:
          Where assembled kits are protected by a durable protection layer, the external fire performance
          can be controlled by the nature of this protection layer. Therefore verification of the external fire
          performance may be omitted, provided the effect of the protection layer is assessed and/or
          stipulated by Commission Decision.
                                                     Page 26
                                                     ETAG 006
The product specifications (preferably in the form of a chemically unambiguous formula) shall
be examined and where it is possible that a substance on the list referred to in art. 6.1.3.1 may
be present, the appropriate tests and evaluations shall be carried out.
                                     Page 27
                                     ETAG 006
5.1.4     SAFETY IN USE (ER4)
          Whilst there will always be at least one full scale wind uplift test, the applicant can always
          request additional full scale wind uplift tests on other combinations.
          Additional limitations on the use of the small scale test concept shall be determined by the test
          laboratory and the approval body in co-operation, based on their experience.
W adm,nc = k × W adm,oc
where
          W adm,nc is the admissible (design) load per fastener of the new combination
          W adm,oc is the admissible (design) load per fastener of the original combination (as determined
          in the full scale wind uplift test)
          k is a correlation factor between the strength of the new combination and the original
          combination, both determined by small scale testing.
          The factor k can never be smaller than 0,5 or larger than 1,0. If the k-value is smaller than 0,5,
          the small scale concept can not be used and a new full scale test is necessary
          Determination of k value:
          The determination method is based on the characteristics of each component either derived
          by small scale testing or obtained from the documents accompanying a CE-marked product.
          The k-value depends on the relationship between the characteristics of the original component
          and the new component and is determined according to the equations mentioned in annex C.
                                                 Page 28
                                                 ETAG 006
There are three possibilities for changes which can be covered by small scale testing: Variations
to the fastener, variations to the membrane and variations to the jointing technique. Table 3
gives an overview of possible changes and where the small scale tests can be used and which
tests should be performed.
Annex C illustrates how the three possibilities are linked with the failure mode and the types of
small scale tests.
∗ = test is necessary
                                     Page 29
                                     ETAG 006
1) If the performed axial loading test, and possibly unwinding test, result in a decreased pull-out
               performance, a new full scale test is required.
           2) If the length of the fastener is changed, no test is required.
           3) Changes in the material group (e.g. APP, PVC, etc.) requires a new full scale test.
           4) Changes in the family of reinforcement (e.g. glass fibre reinforcement, polyester
               reinforcement or a reinforcement made of a combination of the two) requires a new full
               scale test.
           5) Changes in the position of the reinforcement from inside the membrane to the surface
               of the membrane requires a new full scale test
           6) If the “modified” membrane is thinner than the original membrane, a full scale test is
               required. Otherwise, no test is required.
           7) If the peel strength performance of the “modified” membrane is smaller than that of the
               original membrane, a new full scale test is required.
        If a new timber or steel substrate is thicker and/or stronger or if a new concrete substrate has
        a higher compressive strength and density than the one used in the full scale test a new test
        is not necessary. The value determined in the full scale test will be valid for the new substrates.
        For systems with a mineral wool insulation thickness of 0 mm < t ≤ 350 mm, the thickness of the
        insulation material used in the test shall be 100 mm, when not forming part of the kit. The
        insulation material used in the test shall be specified by the applicant and stated in the ETA. The
        compressibility (10 %) according to EN 826 shall be equal to or greater than 0,06 N/mm 2 (the
        requirement applies to homogenous materials and the top layer of multi-layer or composite
        products). The point load behaviour according to EN 12430 shall be equal to or greater than
        500 N, deformation 5 mm.
        Apparatus
        Pressure chamber of sufficient length and width to accommodate the dimensions of the test
        specimen and with such height, that the applied pressure is equally distributed and not affected
        by deformations, if any, of the test specimen.
The pressure chamber is provided with one or more windows, in such a way, that the test
specimen can be observed during the testing.
The pressure chamber shall be capable of resisting a suction of 10 kPa. It shall be possible to
create an airtight seal between the test specimen and the pressure chamber.
Fan, controlling equipment and recording equipment is connected to the pressure chamber, to
achieve dynamic pressure cycles, each with a proportional sequence of loads according to figure
3 and a load accuracy of ±10 % for loads above 2000 Pa.
The substrate of the test rig will depend on the type of fastener and the wishes of the applicant.
If the applicant does not specify a particular substrate the following should be used depending
on whether the fastener is for concrete, timber or steel:
-   Concrete should generally be normal weight concrete strength class C25 according to ENV
    206:1990-03 with a thickness of at least 100 mm. If there is a range of concrete strengths,
    the most critical should be tested and the value found should be used for other types of
    concrete.
-   Steel decks should be galvanised, min. 0,70 mm, specifications min. S280 according to EN
    10147 and the value found may be valid for all thicker and/or stronger steel decks.
If the applicant wishes the test to be performed on another specific substrate (for example
oriented strand board (OSB) or aerated or lightweight concrete) this should be used in the test
and the value found can be valid for other stronger substrates of the same type.
                                       Page 31
                                       ETAG 006
                    Figure 3: Proportional sequence of suction loads.
Test specimen
The test specimen is a model of a roof construction, incorporating a mechanically fastened
flexible roof waterproofing membrane kit. If the insulation material is an integral part of the system
the kit it shall be described in as much detail as possible by giving information on the compressive
strength, density and other characteristics.
The sheets shall be symmetrically positioned and, independently of the width of the sheets,
there shall be three rows of fasteners and the middle row shall run through the centre of the
box. The kit shall be installed according to the manufacturers installation guide.
The number of test specimens is one.
The test specimen shall be conditioned at 23°C ± 5°C for at least 16 h.
Test procedure
The test shall be carried out at 23°C ± 5°C
The test specimen shall be fixed symmetrically in the pressure chamber. The membrane shall be
clamped airtight between the edges of the pressure chamber and the support structure to assure
an airtight seal over the complete length of the edges. For kits with linear fasteners the edge can
be made with an expansion loop on the membrane.
The fan, the controlling and recording equipment shall be used to apply and control the
proportional load pattern (figure 3) as dynamic pressure cycles on the test specimen.
                      1                                            300
                      1                                            300
                      1                                            300
                      1                                            300
                      1                                            400
                      1                                            500
                      1                                            600
                      1                                            700
                      .                                             .
                      .                                             .
                      .                                             .
                      1                                           2000
                      1                                           2100
The applied load shall correspond with the time/pressure diagram shown in figure 4.
The tolerance on the time is ± 0,1 sec and 90 % of the peak load shall be reached in between
0,7 - 1,0 sec. after the loading has started.
                                        Page 32
                                        ETAG 006
                                        Figure 4: Time/pressure diagram
        The behaviour of the test specimen shall be observed during each cycle; the stage, the number
        of cycles and the mode of failure, at which the system fails, shall be recorded.
        The test is carried out with increasing loads (in steps of 100 N as indicated in Table 4) until failure
        of the system or to the limit of the test equipment. The loads quoted per fastener are calculated
        loads derived
        by multiplication of the area of influence Ai (see Figure 2) by the difference between the
        laboratory pressure P lab and the reduced pressure in the pressure chamber P chamb.:
        It shall be ensured that, for each application, the pressure effectively stresses the membrane.
        The pressure under the membrane and the pressure in the laboratory are monitored and if the
        deviation is more than 10% the substrate shall be perforated additionally to fully stress the
        membrane.
The test load W test in N is converted in kPa according to the following formula:
        To obtain the corrected load W corr. of a fastener the test load Wtest is reduced by the factors C a and
        C d as indicated below. The values of Ca and Cd are selected as a function of the chosen test
        system.
W corr. = W test × C a × C d
W corr = corrected load taking into account the correction factors C a and C d
               Ca     = a geometric factor allowing for the difference between the deformation of the
                        waterproof covering in the test and the real deformation for the membrane on a
                        complete roof. The factor C a depends on the parameters a/b and m/b, where m
                                                   Page 33
                                                   ETAG 006
is the length of the shorter side of the test system. The factor C a can be determined from figure 5 and
                        for the three test systems given below, is ≤ 1
                  On substrates where the fasteners are fixed through the substrate, the correction
                  factor C a can also be obtained by using a load-cell during the test. In order to perform
                  a representative test it is important that the fixing pattern is regular. The washer and
                  the upper part of the fastener should be representative of the fastening system being
                  evaluated. The lower part of the fastener is connected to the load-cell through a hole
                  in the substrate. At installation of the model the washer should be pressed on to the
                  system with a force of 220 N ± 10 %.
                  At the maximum pressure just before the sample collapses the actual force is
                  registered. As soon as the initial force of 220 N has dropped to 20 N the system is also
                  deemed to have collapsed.
              C d= a statistical factor allowing for the reduction in the probability of failure of one fastener,
                   due to the reduced number of fasteners in the test system. The values of Cd a s a
                   function of the dimension of the chosen test system are given below
                                                 Page 34
                                                 ETAG 006
        The admissible (design) load per fastener, W adm is calculated according to the following formula:
W adm = W corr/γm
        Where γm = factor relating to the effects of materials and defective quality of installation and
        set to 1,5.
Not relevant
Only considered in relation to kits with a thermal insulation product as a component, see 5.4.6.1.
Not relevant.
                  The test methods marked with *) in the following are repeated for durability purposes
        after appropriate ageing as described in art. 5.2.7.
Not relevant
        Testing of the membrane according to the test methods developed by CEN for the
        EUROCLASSES A 1 – F which are further specified in prEN 13501-1 – Classification using test
        data from reaction to fire tests.
5.2.3.1 Testing of peel resistance of joints (for single-layer waterproof coverings only)*)
Testing of the membrane with respect to peel resistance is performed as described in:
5.2.3.2 Testing of shear resistance of joints (for single-layer waterproof coverings only)*)
                                                   Page 35
                                                   ETAG 006
Testing the system with respect to joint strength is performed as described in
Testing of the membrane with respect to tear resistance is performed as described in:
        Testing of the membrane with respect to resistance to cold bending is performed as described
        in:
prEN 1109 for bituminous sheets and prEN 495-5 for polymeric sheets
        Testing of the membrane with respect to resistance to water pressure is performed as described
        in:
prEN 1928
        Declaration of a generic value or testing of the membrane with respect to water vapour
        permeability is performed as described in:
prEN 1931
Testing of the membrane with respect to tensile properties is performed as described in:
        Testing of the kit with respect to resistance to static loading and impact loading is performed as
        described in:
prEN 12730:1997-01 for static perforation and prEN 12691:1998-01 for impact resistance.
5.2.4.1 SLIPPERINESS
        SS 92 35 15, (2) – Method for determination of the coefficients of friction of various materials with
        respect to slipping.
        Roof surfaces of bituminous products are considered deemed to satisfy the requirements and the
        test is not performed on this material.
                                                Page 36
                                                ETAG 006
5.2.5   PROTECTION AGAINST NOISE (ER5)
Not relevant
Not relevant
5.2.7.0 General
        The characteristics to be tested and assessed and the relevant ageing media are shown in Table
        5.
                                                   Page 37
                                                   ETAG 006
       Table 5. Characteristics to be tested and assessed and ageing media
       (N/A means Not Applicable)
                Ageing media
                                        HEAT                   UV                 WATER                 OZONE
        Characteristics
        PEEL RESISTANCE           ETAG art. 5.2.7.1           N/A           ETAG art. 5.2.7.1 **)         N/A
                                  ETAG art. 6.2.7.1           N/A           ETAG art. 6.2.7.1 **)         N/A
        RESISTANCE TO             ETAG art. 5.2.7.4     ETAG art. 5.2.7.4           N/A             ETAG art. 5.2.7.4
        COLDBENDING/FOLDING       ETAG art. 6.2.7.4     ETAG art. 6.2.7.4           N/A             ETAG art. 6.2.7.4
5.2.7.1 Testing of peel resistance after long term exposure to heat and water
       - for heat: prEN 1296 (for bituminous and polymeric membranes) for 168 days at 70 ±
         2°C
       - for water: prEN 1847 for 30 days at 60 ± 2°C
       After each conditioning the membrane is tested with respect to peel resistance after ageing and
       performed as described in 5.2.3.1 of this Guideline.
       - for heat: prEN 1296 (for bituminous and polymeric membranes) for 168 days at 70 ±
         2°C
       After each conditioning the membrane is tested with respect to shear resistance after ageing and
       performed as described in 5.2.3.2 of this Guideline.
       - for heat: prEN 1296 (for bituminous and polymeric membranes) for 168 days at 70 ±
         2°C
       After the conditioning the membrane is tested with respect to resistance to tear after ageing and
       performed as described in 5.2.3.3 of this Guideline.
5.2.7.4 Resistance to cold bending/folding after long term exposure to heat, UV and ozone
       - for heat: prEN 1296 (for bituminous and polymeric membranes) for 168 days at 70 ±
         2°C
                                                 Page 38
                                                 ETAG 006
        - for UV: according to EOTA Technical Report no. 10 using Climate Class S and a radiant
           exposure
          equivalent to 2 years *)
        - for ozone: according to prEN 1844 for 168 hours at 40 ± 2ºC and concentration 65 ± 5 % **)
        After each conditioning the membrane is tested with respect to resistance to cold bending/folding
        after ageing and performed as described in 5.2.3.4 of this Guideline.
        *) The UV test is not performed on mineral finished materials with a good granule retention
        (according to prEN 12039).
Testing of the membrane with respect to dimensional stability is performed as described in:
prEN 1107
The test is performed only on the materials mentioned in the above mentioned standard.
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
        This test method determines the axial failure of a fastener under static loading, irrespective of the
        failure mode.
         Test apparatus
        Test machine which can be operated with static tensile forces.
        Load cell to measure the force.
        Deformation gauge.
        Holding device for the substrate.
        Device for applying the force to the fastener. The steel jaws holding the fastener should be 10
        mm thick and have a Ø 25 mm hole. See principle in Figure 6.
         Test specimen
        The plastic sleeves are stored for two weeks in the testing laboratory at 23 ± 2ºC and 50 ± 5 %
        RH.
                                                   Page 39
                                                   ETAG 006
       The fasteners shall be installed in the specified substrate according to the manufacturer’s
       installation guide.
The substrates used in the test are defined in art. 5.1.4.1 of this Guideline.
        Procedure
       The fastener and substrate are secured in the test machine in such a manner that any effects
       of bending are as far as possible avoided. The machine shall be operated at a speed of 5 - 10
       mm/min.
        Expression of results
       The failure load of the fastener is found for each specimen. The mean value is calculated and
       the failure mode is noted.
                                              Page 40
                                              ETAG 006
This test method defines the conditions for testing the unwinding resistance of the mechanical
fasteners. The test relates to coupling mechanisms (fastener plus washers) intended to secure
the roof waterproofing membrane, laid over an insulation, onto galvanised steel sheet.
For kits where the unwinding susceptibility of the fastener is known based on existing test and/or
field experience the test is not necessary.
The test is performed with the membrane which will be used with the fastener. Where there is
more than one type of membrane to be used, the selection of membrane should be decided
between the approval body and the applicant.
The test can also be used to assess the effect any changes in the fastener design may have e.g.
change in drill point diameter, thread geometry and surface treatment.
This test can also be performed with supports other than those envisaged in the following.
Principle of test:
The test involves subjecting an assembled specimen to the effects of alternating loads simulating
the effect of wind induced ripples across the sheet in order to assess the likelihood of it
unwinding.
Equipment:
Test apparatus as shown in figure 7.
• Mechanical screwdriver with adapted bit
• Galvanised steel deck 0,7 mm, specifications min. S280 according to EN 10147
• Roof waterproofing membrane forming part of the kit as specified by the applicant
• Mineral wool insulation having a density of 150 kg/m 3 ± 10 %, and a nominal thickness of 50
   mm.
Dimensions: 300 mm x 250 mm (300 mm perpendicular to the direction of manufacture)
Test apparatus:
1. Washer                                                        2. Roofing membrane
3. Fastener                                         4. Galvanised steel sheet
5. Loading mechanism                                6. Mobile arm
7. Insulating panel                                 8. Dual action jack
9. Test sample (plan view)
                                       Page 41
                                       ETAG 006
                       Figure 7. Test apparatus for unwinding test
Principles of test:
A dual action pneumatic jack equipped with adjustable limit switches activates an arm pivoted
about a rigidly fixed axis.
This oscillating arm transmits alternating tensile loads to the roof waterproofing membrane (via
the loading mechanism and cables) which then transmits these loads to the coupling.
The loading mechanism limits the force to which the coupling will be subjected.
Number of cycles: 900. The test can be terminated when unwinding has taken place.
Preliminary adjustments:
• The mobile arm is positioned horizontally and the length of the cables are adjusted such that
    the
  load corresponds to a force of 0,1 kN.
• The jack limit switches are adjusted such that when the arm is at maximum inclination (in either
  direction) the extension of one loading mechanism corresponds to a force of 0,2 kN, the other
  loading mechanism is relaxed (i.e. zero load)
 Procedure
Place the metal sheet into its housing, then position the specimen of insulation and the sample
of roof waterproofing membrane centrally over the metal sheet.
Install the coupling at the centre of the sample using a mechanical screwdriver. Do not fully
tighten the fastener. Use a manual screwdriver to finish tightening the fastener until the washer
is flush with the surface of the waterproofing membrane (+0,-1 mm). If the fastener has an oblong
washer the longitudinal axis shall be perpendicular to the direction of movement.
Using a fine felt-tipped pen, make a reference mark on the fastener head, washer and membrane
in order to monitor the relative movement of the fastener head (possibly also of the washer)
relative to the membrane.
Clamp the sample symmetrically onto the sheet and zero the test apparatus ( 0,1 kN on either
side).
Note the number of cycles after rotation of the fastener head, i.e. ¼ and ½ turn.
                                       Page 42
                                       ETAG 006
       Repeat the test in the same way on 9 other samples.
       This method is intended to test the impact resistance and brittleness of the plastic fastener before
       and after ageing.
       The top edge of the washer is struck by a cylindrical drop weight at an angle of 45º. The angle
       of impact is obtained by placing the fastener in a special shoe.
       •   The fasteners are stored for two weeks in the testing laboratory at 23 ± 2ºC and 50 ± 5 % RH
       •   The vacuum or pressure device is not needed
       •   The mass of the drop weight including the tool shall be 2,0 ± 0,01 kg
       •   The puncturing sphere is replaced by a Ø 30 mm cylindrical piston made of steel hardened to
            50
           HRC.
       • The ballast ring and the expanded polystyrene panel is replaced by a wooden shoe to fix the
           fastener
         as shown in Figure 8. The fastener is fitted in the shoe and placed under the drop weight.
       • The height is measured from the bottom edge of the puncturing tool to the top edge of the
           fastener
         in the shoe.
       • The impact resistance is expressed as the drop height in mm which has not caused damage
           on the
         sleeve or washer of the fastener in any of the 5 specimens.
                                              Page 43
                                              ETAG 006
                       Figure 8: Principle of wooden shoe for holding the fastener
Not relevant
Not relevant
        The test described in this chapter shall be carried out on fasteners including metal parts unless
        they are made from materials which have been proven to be resistant to corrosion. Any fastener
        including metal components not composed of 1.4301 or 1.4401 according to EN 10088 austenitic
        stainless steel shall be subjected to this test.
        Determination of the corrosion behaviour of fasteners is made by testing in accordance with ISO
        6988:1995 - Testing in alternating atmosphere containing sulphur dioxide - on a total of 10
        fasteners.
        The fasteners are to be incorporated into the roof system, as in practice, according to the
        specifications of the fastener manufacturer. The fasteners are installed in a substrate
        corresponding to the use of the fastener with a thermal insulation of expanded perlite with a
        density of at least 150 kg/m 3 and a thickness corresponding to the maximum clamping range of
        the fastener, unless the insulation forms part of the kit in which case the actual insulation is used.
        If the clamping range has no influence on the corrosion performance of the fastener, the
        thickness of the thermal insulation shall be 100 mm. This is not a model of the roof construction
        but a build up for testing purposes only. The length of the fastener which passes through or is
        embedded in the substrate must be measured individually for each fastener and noted.
        The fasteners are removed from the build up without causing further damage to the coating. This
        is facilitated by either cutting through the substrate and insulation, or - if unscrewing - ensuring
        that the fastener and washer are removed as a single item (i.e. that the screw thread does not
        spin in the washer)
                                                   Page 44
                                                   ETAG 006
       The fasteners are subjected to 15 exposure cycles in an alternating humid atmosphere
       containing 2 litres of sulphur dioxide, concentration SFW 2.0 S in accordance with DIN
       50018:1997.
       The test specimens are to be arranged centrally in the test chamber by suspending them
       vertically by the use of an inert thread, such as nylon, with a minimum spacing of 20 mm between
       them. Only test specimens of the same type are to be used for each test, to rule out test
       specimens with different corrosion protection systems affecting each other. Washers (in the case
       of point fasteners); profiles (in the case of linear fasteners); and fastener shafts are to be
       arranged in the test chamber separately from each other. In order to compensate for the small
       surface area of the fasteners a galvanised steel blanking plate should be included to achieve the
       minimum surface test area of 0,5 ± 0,1 m 2.
       The test specimens are exposed to the effect of condensation from water to which 2 litres of
       sulphur dioxide (S0 2) has been added. The 2 litres of sulphur dioxide (S0 2) are charged
       immediately after the test chamber is closed. The heating is switched on to reach a test
       temperature of 40 ± 3°C in 95 ± 5 minutes. One cycle comprises two test stages and last for a
       total of 24 hours. In the first test stage, totalling 8 hours (after the heating is switched on), the test
       specimens are exposed at 40 ± 3°C to the condensation and the sulphur dioxide. The second test
       stage begins when the heating is switched off and the test chamber is opened or ventilated. The
       test specimens are to be left in the chamber, where drying will take place over 16 hours. After the
       second test stage, the base tank of the test chamber is emptied, cleaned, if necessary, and filled
       with fresh distilled or de-ionised water. The test chamber is closed and charged with sulphur
       dioxide. A new cycle begins when the heating is switched on,
       When the 15 cycles have been completed, the test specimens are removed from the test
       chamber and examined for surface corrosion (rusting). Any corrosion which may have formed
       beneath the corrosion protection coating is also to be recorded. If it is clear that the
       requirements of par. 6.3.7.1 cannot be achieved before the 15 cycles are completed, the result
       is considered unsatisfactory and the test may be terminated.
       The head of the fastener and the part of the fastener which has passed through (metal) or is
       embedded in (concrete) the substrate, the rim around the external edges of the washer and
       profiles are not included in the determination of surface corrosion. Visual evaluation is made. In
       borderline cases, the evaluation shall be undertaken by 3 people, independently of each other.
Plastic fasteners are not used in a way which lead to exposure to UV and water.
- Heat ageing for 168 days at 70 ± 2°C in a joint with a fastener installed as on the roof.
Before and after ageing the washer is submitted to testing as described in 5.3.4.3.
       Where the insulation material is already CE marked and tested in accordance with the test
       methods mentioned hereafter, it is not necessary to repeat the tests. However, assessment still
       has to be carried out according to chapter 6 of this Guideline to ensure that the insulation
       material is fit for the intended use. Where the insulation material is not CE-marked the tests in
       this chapter shall be performed and an assessment according to the provisions in chapter 6 shall
       be carried out.
                                                 Page 45
                                                 ETAG 006
5.4.1    M ECHANICAL RESISTANCE AND STABILITY (ER1)
Not relevant
        Testing of the insulation according to the test methods developed by CEN for the
        EUROCLASSES A1 – F which are further specified in prEN 13501-1 - Classification using test data
        from reaction to fire tests.
        Determination of the compression behaviour and point load behaviour of the insulating materials
        is performed as described in:
EN 826 for the compression behaviour and EN 12430 for the point load behaviour.
Not relevant
Not relevant
         EN/ISO 6946:, Building components and building elements – Thermal resistance and thermal
         transmittance – Calculation method.
         prEN 12667, Building materials – Determination of thermal resistance by means of guarded hot
         plate and heat flow meter methods – Products of high and medium thermal resistance
         prEN 12939, Building materials – Determination of thermal resistance by means of guarded hot
         plate and heat flow meter methods – Thick products of high and medium thermal resistance
                                                   Page 46
                                                   ETAG 006
        EN/ISO 10211-1, Thermal bridges in building – Heat flows and surface temperatures – General
        calculation methods.
The durability of the thermal resistance of the insulation material is tested as described in:
        PrEN 13164 – Thermal insulation products for buildings – Factory made products of extruded
        polystyrene foam (XPS) – Specifications
        PrEN 13165– Thermal insulation products for buildings – Factory made rigid polyurethane foam
        (PUR) products – Specifications
        PrEN 13166– Thermal insulation products for buildings – Factory made products of phenolic
        foam (PF) – Specifications
        The combination of the tests on the durability of the thermal resistance and of the thickness will
        provide information on the durability of the λ-value.
        The tests are performed only on the insulation materials covered by prEN 13164, prEN 13165 and
        prEN 13165.
        The possible ways of expressing the results of the assessment of the mandatory performance
        requirements are shown in Table 6.
                                                    Page 47
                                                    ETAG 006
Table 6. Product performance and assessment criteria
2 § 6.1.2 SYSTEM
                                                                      EUROCLASS
        § 6.2.2     COMPONENT/MEMBRANE
        § 6.2.2.1   Reaction to fire
                                                                      EUROCLASS
        § 6.4.2     COMPONENT/INSULATION
        § 6.4.2.1   Reaction to fire
3 § 6.1.3 SYSTEM
§ 6.2.3 COMPONENTS/MEMBRANE
§ 6.4.3 COMPONENTS/INSULATION
4 § 6.1.4 SYSTEM
6 § 6.4.6 COMPONENTS/INSULATION
                                            Page 48
                                            ETAG 006
           **)         § 6.2.7     COMPONENTS/MEMBRANE
                       § 6.2.7.1   Peel resistance after long term exposure to heat and water       Declared value and
                                                                                                    conclusion
                       § 6.2.7.2   Shear resistance after long term exposure to heat and water      Declared value and
                                                                                                    conclusion
                       § 6.2.7.3   Tear resistance after long term exposure to heat                 Declared value and
                                                                                                    conclusion
                       § 6.2.7.4   Resistance to cold bending/folding after long term exposure to   Declared value and
                                   heat, UV and water                                               conclusion
6.1 SYSTEM
Not relevant
                                                            Page 49
                                                            ETAG 006
6.1.4     SAFETY IN USE (ER4)
          Admissible (design) load determined as the result of the wind uplift test and the possible small
          scale tests.
Not relevant
Only considered in relation to kits with a thermal insulation material as a component (see 6.4.6.1).
Not relevant.
Not relevant
          Classification of the membrane with respect to the reaction to fire is undertaken in accordance
          with prEN 13501-1 (Classification using test data from reaction to fire tests). The following range
          of EUROCLASSES is used: from A 1 – F, class F offering a no performance determined option.
Test results marked with *) are also for durability purposes as described in art. 6.2.7.
                                                     Page 50
                                                     ETAG 006
6.2.3.4   Resistance to cold bending/folding*)
6.2.4.1 Slipperiness
Not relevant
Not relevant
6.2.7.1 Peel resistance after long term exposure to heat and water
          If the decrease in the peel resistance is equal to or less than 20 % after ageing this may be
          considered to be applicable to an expected working life of at least 10 years since the overall
          quality of the kit is proven by the wind uplift test.
          If the decrease in the peel resistance is more than 20 % after ageing further investigations (e.g.
          establishing further points on the degradation curve and/or level of declared value after ageing)
          shall be undertaken by the Approval Body. This assessment should be carried out in accordance
          with the provisions in EOTA Guidance Document for the Assessment of Working Life of Products,
          Final draft, March 1997, paragraph 4.3.4 Accelerated ageing conditions.
6.2.7.2 Shear resistance after long term exposure to heat and water
                                                     Page 51
                                                     ETAG 006
          If the decrease in the shear resistance is equal to or less than 20 % after ageing this may be
          considered to be applicable to an expected working life of at least 10 years since the overall
          quality of the kit is proven by the wind uplift test.
          If the decrease in the shear resistance is more than 20 % after ageing further investigations (e.g.
          establishing further points on the degradation curve and/or level of declared value after ageing)
          shall be undertaken by the Approval Body. This assessment should be carried out in accordance
          with the provisions in EOTA Guidance Document for the Assessment of Working Life of Products,
          Final draft, March 1997, paragraph 4.3.4 Accelerated ageing conditions.
          If the decrease in the tear resistance is equal to or less than 20 % after ageing this may be
          considered to be applicable to an expected working life of at least 10 years since the overall
          quality of the kit is proven by the wind uplift test.
          If the decrease in the tear resistance is more than 20 % after ageing further investigations (e.g.
          establishing further points on the degradation curve and/or level of declared value after ageing)
          shall be undertaken by the Approval Body. This assessment should be carried out in accordance
          with the provisions in EOTA Guidance Document for the Assessment of Working Life of Products,
          Final draft, March 1997, paragraph 4.3.4 Accelerated ageing conditions.
6.2.7.4 Resistance to cold bending/folding after long term exposure to heat, UV and water
          If the decrease in the resistance to cold bending/folding is equal to or less than 15°C after ageing
          this may be considered to be applicable to an expected working life of at least 10 years since the
          overall quality of the kit is proven by the wind uplift test.
          If the decrease in the resistance to cold bending/folding is more than 15ºC after ageing further
          investigations (e.g. establishing further points on the degradation curve and/or level of declared
          value after ageing) shall be undertaken by the Approval Body. This assessment should be carried
          out in accordance with the provisions in EOTA Guidance Document for the Assessment of
          Working Life of Products, Final draft, March 1997, paragraph 4.3.4 Accelerated ageing
          conditions.
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
                                                    Page 52
                                                    ETAG 006
6.3.4     SAFETY IN USE (ER4)
          Indicate the rotation made by the fastener head after 500 cycles. The rotation of the fastener
          head shall be less than or equal to ¼ turn.
          Indicate the rotation made by the fastener head after 900 cycles (end of test). The rotation of the
          fastener head shall be less than or equal to ½ turn.
          Indicate any vertical movement made by the fastener head after 900 cycles. Allowing for the pitch
          of the fastener thread, the calculated vertical displacement shall be less than or equal to 1 mm
          per fastener turn.
Not relevant
Not relevant
          Fasteners for use without restrictions on the risk of corrosion and condensation shall be made
          of materials which are deemed to satisfy the requirements on corrosion, e.g. made from austenitic
          stainless steel 1.4301 or 1.4401 according to EN 10088 and are considered deemed to satisfy.
          Other metallic fasteners shall have undergone an anti-corrosion treatment. In this respect, the
          moisture content of the material of the load-bearing structure and any condensation likely to occur
          shall be taken into account.
          After the test in accordance with 5.3.7.1, the metallic parts shall not exhibit more than 15% surface
          corrosion (rust formation) or corrosion formation recognisable beneath the corrosion protection
          coating.
          Fasteners which fulfil the above mentioned requirements after testing according to 5.3.7.1 may
          only be used on roofs presenting only a slight risk of corrosion and condensation (eg. above
                                                     Page 53
                                                     ETAG 006
          rooms with low humidity, in non-aggressive atmosphere and/or in an environment not harmful to
          the fastener).
          Fasteners for use in concrete with a metallic shaft totally protected by a plastic sleeve above the
          surface of the concrete to the head of the metallic element may also be used without restrictions
          if they fulfil the requirements mentioned above after testing according to 5.3.7.1.
          If the decrease in the drop height is equal to or less than 20 % after ageing this may be
          considered to be applicable to an expected working life of at least 10 years since the overall
          quality of the kit is proven by the wind uplift test.
          If the decrease in the drop height is more than 20 % after ageing further investigations (e.g.
          establishing further points on the degradation curve and/or level of declared value after ageing)
          shall be undertaken by the Approval Body. This assessment should be carried out in accordance
          with the provisions in EOTA Guidance Document for the Assessment of Working Life of Products,
          Final draft, March 1997, paragraph 4.3.4 Accelerated ageing conditions.
Not relevant
          Classification of the insulation product with respect to the reaction to fire is undertaken in
          accordance with prEN 13501-1 (Classification using test data from reaction to fire tests). The
          following range of EUROCLASSES is used: from A1 – F, class F offering a no performance
          determined option.
Not relevant
Not relevant
                                                     Page 54
                                                     ETAG 006
6.4.6     ENERGY ECONOMY AND HEAT RETENTION (ER6)
          Where the insulation material does not form part of the kit an assessment is not carried out.
          Otherwise, the thermal resistance of the insulation material used in the kit is indicated according
          to the standards mentioned in 5.4.6.1.
          All components of the mechanically fastened flexible roof waterproofing membrane kit shall be
          clearly identified. Where possible, this shall be done by reference to European Standards.
          Where components are not covered by European Standards, they shall be precisely defined by
          reference to physical characteristics as indicated in this Guideline.
          The determination of the product characteristics shall be based on testing in accordance with the
          appropriate CEN or EOTA test methods as far as they exist.
                                                     Page 55
                                                     ETAG 006
7.    ASSUMPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS under which the fitness for use of the
      products is assessed
7.0 General
      Chapter 7 sets out the preconditions for design, execution, maintenance and repair which are a
      presumption for the assessment of the fitness for use according to the Guideline (only when
      necessary and in so far as they have a bearing on the assessment or on the products).
The issued European Technical Approvals shall state these conditions, where relevant.
7.1   D ESIGN AND EXECUTION OF SYSTEMS OF MECHANICALLY FASTENED FLEXIBLE ROOF WATERPROOFING MEMBRANES
      INTO THE WORKS
Design
      The design of the roof intended to be covered by the mechanically fastened roof
      waterproofing system should take account of the following factors:
The desired properties of the roof should be determined and specified accordingly.
Substrates
      The substrate onto which the waterproofing kit is to be laid should be sufficiently rigid, dense
      and dimensionally stable to support the system (membrane and insulation). Its nature will
      depend on the type of roof selected (warm deck, cold deck, or inverted) and in turn will have a
      direct influence on the method of attachment.
      In order to support the loads imposed by traffic, insulation materials for use in warm decks
      should be capable of resisting permanent deformation or damage when subjected to
      concentrated loads. They should have a dust-free surface and sufficient laminar strength to
      resist with a margin of safety any stress imposed by wind uplift forces.
      It shall be ensured that the insulation material on site has at least the characteristics as the
      insulation material used in the wind uplift test and stated in the ETA.
      When insulation materials with a compressibility of <0.1Nmm -2 (at 10% compression) are used,
      the membrane may be vulnerable to puncture by the fastener penetrating through the
      underside. This may be prevented by using a fastener/washer, strip or lath with an “anti-pop-
      up” design. These designs are often marketed as “Treadfast” and may feature a mechanical
      interlock between the fastener and the washer strip or lath, which is engaged upon fastener
      installation. Examples of other designs include a deep recess in the washer, strip or lath, or a
                                             Page 56
                                             ETAG 006
      plastic washer with integrated sleeve.
Roof materials
      The following is a list of recommendations for roof deck materials to receive the mechanically
      fastened roof waterproofing system.
      •   Reinforced concrete. Where a roof slab of reinforced concrete is designed as the deck,
          which will directly support the waterproofing, it is preferable to lay the slab to provide
          adequate drainage falls and adequate provision should be made for drying out the slab. A
          concrete surface, which is not adequately smooth, or does not provide even drainage falls,
          should be screeded. The surface of the concrete should be finished with a wood float to
          provide a reasonably smooth surface free from ridges and hollows.
      •   Profiled metal decking. Metal decking does not provide a continuous supporting surface for
          the application of the waterproofing membrane and therefore it shall always be used in
          conjunction with a continuous support, e.g. insulation material. The metal decking should
          not be less than 0,70 mm.
      •   Timber boarding, including OSB. Roof decks of timber boarding should be designed using
          naturally durable timber or pre-treated against infestation by wood boring insects and
          fungal decay. Any method of pre-treatment should be compatible with the kit components.
          Boarding should not be less than 19 mm nominal thickness, planed, closely clamped
          together with tongued and grooved joints or closely butted and secured by nailing with nail
          heads not protruding.
      •   Plywood. Roof decks of plywood should be specified as “water boil proof” bonded veneer
          plywood and durable or treated with a compatible preservative and should not be less than
          19 mm nominal thickness. Plywood for roof decks may be square edged or tongued and
          grooved. Longitudinal joints should occur on the centre of supporting joists. Cross joists
          should be staggered and in the case of square edged boarding additional support is required,
          such as the use of noggins.
      If there is doubt about the suitability of the substrate, e.g. on a construction site, a pullout test on
      site should be performed to verify the performance of the kit (see Annex D). Furthermore, care
      should be taken during design that bimetallic corrosion between metal parts, especially between
      the substrate and the screw, does not occur. Likewise, the use of insulation materials containing
      substances which can affect the performance of the fasteners shall be avoided.
      Further conditions for design and execution of the system into the works shall be taken from the
      manufacturer's installation guide. The quality and sufficiency of this installation guide shall be
      assessed, in particular concerning the aspects indicated in chapter 9.1 of this Guideline;
      Information on the design.
      It shall be stated in the ETA that the installation guide forms part of the ETA. The ETA holder is
      responsible for delivering the installation guide to the roofing contractor. The ETA may take over
      the essential parts of the installation guide.
      The components of the kit shall be handled and stored with care and be protected from
      accidental damage.
      The kit shall be installed in accordance with the ETA holder's installation instructions by
      competent roofing contractors. ETA holders may operate an approved contractors scheme.
                                               Page 57
                                               ETAG 006
      Extra care should be taken when handling and installing the insulation material.
      The assessment of the fitness for use is based on the assumption that a normal maintenance of
      the system is performed.
      When replacing components they shall be approved by the manufacturer and covered by the
      ETA.
                                           Page 58
                                           ETAG 006
Page 59
ETAG 006
              Section Three: ATTESTATION OF CONFORMITY (AC)
8.2 R ESPONSIBILITIES
              Manufacturers having an FPC system which complies with EN ISO 9000 and which addresses
              the requirements of an ETA are recognised as satisfying the FPC requirements of the
              Directive.
1
 In this respect Approval Bodies shall be able to have open arrangements with relevant Approved Bodies to
avoid duplication, respecting each others responsibilities.
                                                   Page 60
                                                   ETAG 006
8.2.3       Tasks of the approved body
8.2.3.1     Assessment of the factory production control system - initial inspection and continuous
            surveillance
Assessment of the factory production control system is the responsibility of the approved body.
          An assessment must be carried out of each production unit to demonstrate that the factory
          production control is in conformity with the ETA and any subsidiary information. This
          assessment shall be based on an initial inspection of the factory.
          It is recommended that surveillance inspections be conducted at least twice per year. However,
          if the results of the first inspection are satisfactory, the inspection interval can be reduced to
          once per year.
8.3 D OCUMENTATION
          In order to help the approved body make an evaluation of conformity the approval body issuing
          the ETA shall supply the information detailed below. This information together with the
          requirements given in EC Guidance Paper B will generally form the basis on which the factory
          production control (FPC) is assessed by the approved body.
          This information shall initially be prepared or collected by the approval body and shall be
          agreed with the manufacturer. The following gives guidance on the type of information required:
The nature of any additional (confidential) information shall be declared in the ETA.
                The basic manufacturing process shall be described in sufficient detail to support the
                proposed FPC methods.
The manufacturer and the approval body issuing the ETA shall agree an FPC test plan.
                                              Page 61
                                              ETAG 006
An agreed FPC test plan is necessary as current standards relating to quality management
systems (Guidance Paper B, EN 29002, etc), do not ensure that the product specification
remains unchanged and they cannot address the technical validity of the type or frequency
of checks/tests.
The validity of the type and frequency of checks/tests conducted during production and on
the final product shall be considered. This will include the checks conducted during
manufacture on properties that cannot be inspected at a later stage and for checks on the
final product. These will normally include:
Membrane:
Checks on incoming materials:
  Supplier’s certificate of conformity possibly including tests and/or combined with a simple
  material related test, e.g. penetration test for bitumen. Frequency: Each batch.
  Checks on process:
  Process parameters, e.g. thickness, width and monitoring of speed and temperature, shall
  be included in the FPC. Frequency: At least at the beginning, the middle and the end of
  every shift.
  Some of the above mentioned tests on finished products may not be necessary for
  certain applications.
  Fasteners:
  Checks on incoming materials:
  Suppliers certificate of conformity for steel materials and for plastic materials according
  to EN 10204, including density according to ISO 1183 and Melt Flow Index (MFI)
  according to ISO 1183. Frequency: Each batch.
  Checks on process:
  Metal parts:
  Not applicable
  Plastic parts:
  Check the most important process parameters for plastic part manufacturing
                                  Page 62
                                 ETAG 006
            For plastic parts:
            •    Geometry
            Insulation materials:
            Checks on incoming materials:
            Not applicable.
            Checks on process:
            Not applicable.
      The ETA shall indicate the information to accompany the CE marking and the placement of CE
      marking and the accompanying information (the kit/components itself/themselves, an attached
      label, the packaging, or the accompanying commercial documents).
                                             Page 63
                                            ETAG 006
                             Section Four: ETA CONTENT
      The format of the ETA shall be based on the Commission Decision of 1997-07-22, EC Official
      Journal L236 of 1997-08-27.
      The ETA shall specify the kits/components covered by the ETA (type of membrane, type of
      fastener, possibly type of insulation, vapour control layers etc.) and basic requirements for the
      substrate (see art. 7.1). The ETA shall also state that on site pull out tests can be performed if
      there is doubt concerning the suitability of the substrate.
      The technical part of the ETA shall contain the information listed hereafter. The ETA shall either
      give the appropriate indication, classification, statement or description or - where relevant –
      indicate the “no performance determined” option. The items are given with reference to the
      relevant clauses of this Guideline:
      -   Membrane:
          - seam overlap according to detailing
                                             Page 64
                                            ETAG 006
      -   Fastening:
          - design of fastener spacing and areas according to national requirements
          - spacing of fasteners (according to kind of fastening)
            -   minimum distance in row
            -   maximum distance in row
            -   distance of the washer to the seam edge
          - design of perimeter and edge fixation
            -   fastener spacings at upstands and penetrations
            -   fastening system and fastener spacings
              -  linear fastening
                 -   with coated metal
                 -   with metal trim / -profile
              -  spot fastening (linear fastening)
                 -   spot fastening in row and in seam overlap
                 -   spot fastening with cover strips
          - fastening with support construction, e.g. timber beam
      -   Insulation:
          - fixation of the insulation
      The ETA may include annotated drawings with the dimensions marked and drawn to an adequate
      scale. The drawings should be accompanied by a description of particular installation details.
      It shall be stated in the ETA that the manufacturer’s installation guide forms part of the ETA, see
      7.1.
      Similarly, it shall be stated in the ETA whether or not any additional information (possibly
      confidential) shall be supplied to the approved body for the evaluation of attestation of conformity,
      see 8.3 of this Guideline.
                                              Page 65
                                             ETAG 006
                                          Annex A
A. List of reference documents
Council Directive 89/106/EEC (CPD) 21 December 1988 – O.J. L40 – 11 February 1989
EN 10147:1993                    Continuously hot-dip zinc coated structural steel sheet and strip –
                                 technical delivery conditions
prEN 12316-1:1996-02             Flexible sheets for roofing – Determination of peel resistance of joints
                                 – Part 1: Bitumen sheets
prEN 12316-2:1995-02             Flexible sheets for roofing – Determination of peel resistance of joints
                                 – Part 2
prEN 12317-1: 1996-02            Flexible sheets for roofing – Determination of shear resistance of joints
                                 – Part 1: Bitumen sheets
prEN 12317-2:1995-02             Flexible sheets for roofing – Determination of shear resistance of joints
                                 – Part 2
prEN 12310-1:1996-02             Flexible sheets for roofing – Determination of nail shank tear resistance
                                 – Part 1: Bitumen sheets
prEN 1109:1996-07                Flexible sheets for roofing – Bitumen sheets – Determination of flexibility
                                 at low temperature
prEN 495-5:1991-05               Thermoplastic and elastomeric roofing and sealing sheets; low
                                 temperature folding test
prEN 12311-1:1996-02             Flexible sheets for roofing – Determination of tensile properties – Part
                                 1: Bitumen sheets
prEN 12311-2:1998-07             Flexible sheets for roofin g – Determination of tensile properties – Part
                                 2
                                             Page 66
                                            ETAG 006
prEN 12730:1997-01    Flexible sheets for roofing – Determination of resistance to static
                      loading
prEN 1296:1998-05     Flexible sheets for waterproofing – Bitumen, plastic and rubber sheets
                      for roofing – Artificial ageing by long term exposure to elevated
                      temperature
prEN 1297:1994-01     Flexible sheets for roofing; determination of resistance to UV and water
                      ageing; part 1: bitumen sheeting
prEN 12039:1995-07    Flexible sheets for roofing – bitumen sheeting – Determination of loss
                      of granules
prEN 1107-1:1996-08   Flexible sheets for roofing – Determination of dimensional stability; Part
                      1
prEN 1107-2:1993-06   Flexible sheets for roofing – Determination of dimensional stability; Part
                      2
prEN 1297:1999-05     Flexible Sheets for waterproofing – Bitumen, plastic and rubber sheets
                      for roof waterproofing – Method of artificial ageing by long term
                      exposure to the combination of UV radiation, elevated temperature
                      and water
EN/ISO 6946:1997      Building components and building elements – Thermal resistance and
                        thermal transmittance – Calculation method.
EN/ISO 10211-1:1995   Thermal bridges in building construction – Heat flows and surface
                      temperatures – Part 1: General calculation methods.
                                  Page 67
                                 ETAG 006
DIN 50018:1997-06                 Prüfung im Kondenswasser – Wechselklima mit schwefel-dioxidhaltiger
                                  Atmosphäre
CONSTRUCT 95/148 – Rev. 1         Working Document on Dangerous Substances and in accordance with
                                  CONSTRUCT 97/219 – Rev. 1 Guidance paper on the Treatment of
                                  Dangerous Substances under Construction Products Directive
EOTA Guidance Document for the Assessment of Working Life of Products, Final draft, March 1997
EOTA Technical Report no. 10      Liquid Applied Roof Waterproofing Kits (LARWK) – Exposure procedure
                                  for artificial ageing
Construct 97/223 – Rev. 1         Mandate to EOTA for Systems of mechanically fastened flexible roof
                                  waterproofing membranes
prEN (WI 00254041):1999-02-15     Flexible sheets for waterproofing – reinforced bitumen sheets for roof
                                  waterproofing – Definitions and characteristics
ISO 1183:1985                     Methods for determining the density and relative density (specific
                                  gravity) of plastics excluding cellular plastics
EC Guidance Paper C               The Treatment of Kits and Systems under the Construction Products
                                  Directive
                                             Page 68
                                            ETAG 006
 Page 69
ETAG 006
                                         Annex B
B.1.1 Construction works (and parts of works) (often simply referred to as “works”) (ID1.3.1)
        Everything that is constructed or results from construction operations and is fixed to the
        ground.
        (This covers both building and civil engineering works, and both structural and non-structural
        elements).
        Products manufactured for incorporation in a permanent manner in the works and placed as
        such on the market.
        (The term includes materials, elements and components of prefabricated systems or
        installations.)
             that the dismantling or the replacement of the product are operations involving
        -
            construction activities.
Role(s) that the product is intended to play in the fulfilment of the essential requirements.
        Used in this document to cover all types of incorporation techniques, such as installation,
        assembling, incorporation, etc.
        Construction product consisting of at least two separate components that need to be put
        together to be installed permanently in the works.
B.2 Performances
        Products have such characteristics that the works in which they are intended to be
        incorporated, assembled, applied or installed, can, if properly designed and built, satisfy the
        essential requirements.
                                            Page 70
                                           ETAG 006
          Ability of the works to fulfil their intended use and in particular the essential requirements
          relevant for this use.
          The products must be suitable for construction works which (as a whole and in their separate
          parts) are fit for their intended use, subject to normal maintenance, be satisfied for an
          economically reasonable working life. The requirements generally concern foreseeable actions
          (CPD Annex I, Preamble).
        The quantitative expression (value, grade, class or level) of the behaviour of the works, parts
        of works or of the products, for an action to which it is subject or which it generates under the
        intended service conditions (works or parts of works) or intended use conditions (products).
        Service conditions of the works which may affect the compliance of the works with the essential
        requirements of the Directive and which are brought about by agents (mechanical, chemical,
        biological, thermal or electro-magnetic) acting on the works or parts of the works.
B.2.6 Classes or levels (for essential requirements and for related product performances) (ID 1.2.1)
B.3 ETAG-format
        Expression and application, in more detail and in terms applicable to the scope of the guideline,
        of the relevant requirements of the CPD (given concrete form in the ID's and further specified
        in the mandate, for works or parts of the works, taking into account the durability and
        serviceability of the works.
        Verification methods used to determine the performance of the products in relation to the
        requirements for the works (calculations, tests, engineering knowledge, evaluation of site
        experience, etc.)
        Transposition of the requirements into precise and measurable (as far as possible and
        proportional to the importance of the risk) or qualitative terms, related to the products and their
        intended use.
                                                Page 71
                                               ETAG 006
B.4       Working life
B.4.1 Working life (of works or parts of the works) (ID 1.3.5(1))
          The period of time during which the performance will be maintained at a level compatible with
          the fulfilment of the essential requirements.
          Period of time during which the performances of the product are maintained - under the
          corresponding service conditions - at a level compatible with the intended use conditions.
            Working life which takes into account all relevant aspects, such as costs of design, construction
            and use, costs arising from hindrance of use, risks and consequences of failure of the works
            during its working life and cost of insurance covering these risks, planned partial renewal,
            costs of inspections, maintenance, care and repair, costs of operation and administration, of
            disposal and environmental aspects.
            A set of preventive and other measures which are applied to the works in order to enable the
            works to fulfil all its functions during its working life. These measures include cleaning,
            servicing, repainting, repairing, replacing parts of the works where needed, etc.
            Maintenance, normally including inspections, which occurs at a time when the cost of the
            intervention which has to be made is not disproportionate to the value of the part of the work
            concerned, consequential costs (e.g. exploitation) being taken into account.
            Ability of the product to contribute to the working life of the work by maintaining its
            performances, under the corresponding service conditions, at a level compatible with the
            fulfilment of the essential requirements by the works.
            Body notified in accordance with Article 10 of the CPD, by an EU Member State or by an EFTA
            State (contracting party to the EEA Agreement), to issue European Technical Approvals in (a)
            specific construction product area(s). All such bodies are required to be members of the
            European Organisation for Technical Approvals (EOTA), set up in accordance with Annex II.2
            of the CPD.
B.6 Abbreviations
                                               Page 72
                                              ETAG 006
B.6.1   Abbreviations concerning the Construction products directive
                                          Page 73
                                         ETAG 006
                                                 Annex C
1) (Left column of the charts): If the original failure mode of the full scale wind uplift test relates to the
   component that is changed, a small scale test is performed on the new component in order to find the
   relationship between the strength of the original component and the strength of the new component.
   (In some cases it is not necessary to perform a test, e.g. if the new component is CE-marked and the
   characteristic which needs to be determined appears from documents accompanying the CE-marking).
   If the resistance of the new component is smaller than the resistance of the original component then the
   k-factor can be determined by dividing the new resistance with the original resistance. If the resistance
   of the new component is higher than the original resistance the k-factor is set at 1,0, since extrapolation
   can not take place.
2) (Right column of the charts): If the failure mode does not relate to the component that is changed, a
   small scale test is still performed, but in this case to ensure that the new component is not weaker than
   the original component. This will ensure that the failure mode will stay the same and the k-factor is
   therefore set at 1,0. If the new component turns out to be weaker than the original component, a full
   scale wind uplift test shall be performed with the new component.
   The concept means that k values smaller than 1,0 can only be found if the new component is weaker
   than the original component.
                                                  Page 74
                                                 ETAG 006
 Page 75
ETAG 006
 Page 76
ETAG 006
 Page 77
ETAG 006
                                                Annex D
D. Site pullout test.
The following is a recommendation for the carrying out of an on site pullout test.
          Purpose of test
The site pullout test is used to confirm the behaviour and ultimate pullout load at failure of the fastener.
This is then divided by a safety factor to give the admissible (design) pullout load for that specific
fastener type into that specific substrate on a given project.
         Equipment
Although many variations are in use, a basic pullout test unit will comprise (see figure D1):
         Base plate
Supports the unit on the roof surface.
Should have a reasonable surface area.
         Pulling plate/jaw
Fits under the head of the fastener.
Due to the wide range of fastener types it often has interchangeable inserts for different shank diameters
or threaded collars for testing studding etc.
          Tensioning device
Usually a threaded high tensile steel screw and handle.
          Measuring scale/gauge
Usually hydraulic and measures the force applied by the tensioning screw. The test unit shall be calibrated
frequently.
          Method
Pullout testing requires a fixing with sufficient space beneath the head to insert the pulling plate. On a new
build project or a refurbishment project involving new mechanical fixings, a partially driven fixing would be
used. Any roofing material (e.g. membrane, existing insulation) that may influence the pullout values shall
be removed before the test is performed. The fastener shall be installed using the same method as will be
used during actual construction (i.e. depth of installation, hole diameter, installation tools).
A minimum of six samples per 5000 m2 roof shall be tested. The tests should be performed across the roof
in various areas including corners and the perimeter, to provide a good cross section example of
performance. The location of the tests should allow for 50 % more tests in the corner and perimeter. Any
area that is likely to have deck damage due to leaks should be tested.
            Procedure
•   The correct insert or collar for the fixing to be tested is selected and fitted it into the pulling plate.
•   If different indicator gauges are available the most suitable is selected and the Maximum Load indicator
     is set
    to zero.
•   The testing unit is located over the fixing and the pulling plate insert is slid beneath to engage the head
     of the
    fixing.
•   The load is applied to the fastener by slowly turning the tensioning handle and the Current and Maximum
     Load
    needles are observed. The load is applied gradually, and the needle behaviour is noted until the Current
    Load needle starts to fall away.
                                                   Page 78
                                                  ETAG 006
•   The travelling Maximum Load indicator will remain at the highest position to identify the maximum pullout
    figure
•   The tension is gradually released and the pulling plate is returned to its flush starting position and
     withdrawn from
    the fixing.
                                                  Page 79
                                                 ETAG 006
   Treatment of results
The admissible (design) pullout load is calculated from the following formula:
F adm = Χ/ν
For design purposes the lowest of either W adm derived from full scale or small scale testing according to this
Guideline or F adm from the on site pullout test is to be used.
F adm derived at building sites reflects only the pullout performance of the fastener and does not take into
account other failure modes such as washer deformation, membrane tearing etc. Therefore, a value higher
than W adm determined according to this Guideline may never be used.
                                                  Page 80
                                                 ETAG 006