AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

Common Law Copyright by Sovereign Services

Notice: This document contains copyrighted material. These materials
may be reproduced for personal use only. Contact
webmaster@buildfreedom.com for additional details regarding
copyright.
[Editor: The actual !davit begins following these comments. "efore
using the !davit# you may need to do some reformatting as well as
eliminating these comments.
$any organi%ations provide services individuals can apply to change
their status from &ta' slave& or &feudal sub(ect of the government& to
Sovereign )ndividual. Some organi%ations provide you with hundreds of
pages of documentation you send to do%ens of government agencies.
They more or less do everything for you. *ther organi%ations provide
courses in which they teach you how to do it yourself. They don+t want
you to become dependent on them. Typically# these services cost
anything from ,-.. to ,/.#....
0e have developed a simple approach that may achieve the same
ob(ective an &!davit of Truth& you 1le with the local County 2ecorder.
3ou don+t send it to any government agencies 4 so you minimi%e the
ris5 of raising &red 6ags& and being put on government &hit lists.&
The !davit of Truth is a /74page document that basically states that
the person declaring it is a Sovereign )ndividual or &freeborn
Sovereign& consistent with the tradition of natural common law.
Several 8.S. Supreme Court cases are cited in support of this
declaration.
The !davit then declares that any supposed &hidden& or &adhesion&
contracts# the government might claim have compromised the status
of the Sovereign# are null and void from the outset. Speci1cally covered
are:
The use of Federal Reserve Notes;
The use of a bank account;
The use of a Social Security number;
The use of a driver's license;
Using state license plates on a car;
Past ta returns;
!irth certificate;
"arriage #icense;
$hildren in public school;
%eclaration of U&S& $iti'enship;
(oter registration;
Use of )*letter state abbreviation and 'ip code&
The !davit continues to describe 9ederal :urisdiction as de1ned by
the 8.S. Constitution and a number of 8.S. Supreme Court cases. Then
it covers the powers and contractual obligations of government
o!cials and the issue of statutes and regulations contrary to the 8.S.
Constitution being null and void.
9inally# the !davit includes a revocation of any power of attorney the
government might claim attaches to the Social Security number and
birth certi1cate.
This !davit has not been tested in any court# and we cannot ma5e
any claims as to its e!cacy.
End of comments.;
2EC*2<)=> 2E?8ESTE< "3# ;
=< 0@E= 2EC*2<E< 2ET82= T*: ;
;
=$E ;
ST2EETA"*B ;
C)T3 ;
STTE CSDCE "*EE T@)S L)=E 9*2 2EC*2<E2+S
8SE *=L3F
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
"e it 5nown to all courts# governments# and other parties# that )#
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG#
am a natural# freeborn Sovereign# without sub(ects. ) am neither
sub(ect to any entity anywhere# nor is any entity sub(ect to me. )
neither dominate anyone# nor am ) dominated.
$y authority for this statement is the same as it is for all free
Sovereigns everywhere: the age4old# timeless# and universal respect
for the intrinsic rights# property# freedoms# and responsibilities of the
Sovereign )ndividual.
) am not a &person& when such term is de1ned in statutes of the 8nited
States or statutes of the several states when such de1nition includes
arti1cial entities. ) refuse to be treated as a federally or state created
entity which is only capable of e'ercising certain rights# privileges# or
immunities as speci1cally granted by federal or state governments.
) voluntarily choose to comply with the man4made laws which serve to
bring harmony to society# but no such laws# nor their enforcers# have
any authority over me. ) am not in any (urisdiction# for ) am not of
sub(ect status.
Consistent with the eternal tradition of natural common law# unless )
have harmed or violated someone or their property# ) have committed
no crimeH and am therefore not sub(ect to any penalty.
) act in accordance with the following 8.S. Supreme Court case:
&The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as
a citi%en. @e is entitled to carry on his private business in
his own way. @is power to contract is unlimited. @e owes
no such duty [to submit his boo5s and papers for an
e'amination; to the State# since he receives nothing
therefrom# beyond the protection of his life and property.
@is rights are such as e'isted by the law of the land
[Common Law; long antecedent to the organi%ation of the
State# and can only be ta5en from him by due process of
law# and in accordance with the Constitution. mong his
rights are a refusal to incriminate himself# and the
immunity of himself and his property from arrest or sei%ure
e'cept under a warrant of the law. @e owes nothing to the
public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.&
Hale v. Henkel# 7./ 8.S. IJ at IK C/L.-F.
Thus# be it 5nown to all# that ) reserve my natural common law right
not to be compelled to perform under any contract that ) did not enter
into 5nowingly# voluntarily# and intentionally. nd furthermore# ) do not
accept the liability associated with the compelled and pretended
&bene1t& of any hidden or unrevealed contract or commercial
agreement.
s such# the hidden or unrevealed contracts that supposedly create
obligations to perform# for persons of sub(ect status# are inapplicable to
me# and are null and void. )f ) have participated in any of the supposed
&bene1ts& associated with these hidden contracts# ) have done so
under duress# for lac5 of any other practical alternative. ) may have
received such &bene1ts& but ) have not accepted them in a manner
that binds me to anything.
ny such participation does not constitute &acceptance& in contract
law# because of the absence of full disclosure of any valid &oMer#& and
voluntary consent without misrepresentation or coercion# under
contract law. 0ithout a valid voluntary oMer and acceptance# 5nowingly
entered into by both parties# there is no &meeting of the minds#& and
therefore no valid contract. ny supposed &contract& is therefore void#
ab initio.
9rom my age of consent to the date a!'ed below ) have never signed
a contract 5nowingly# willingly# intelligently# and voluntarily whereby )
have waived any of my natural common law rights# and# as such# Take
Notice that ) revo5e# cancel# and ma5e void ab initio my signature on
any and all contracts# agreements# forms# or any instrument which may
be construed in any way to give any agency or department of any
federal or state government authority# venue# or (urisdiction over me.
This position is in accordance with the 8.S. Supreme Court decision of
Brady v. U.S.# JKL 8.S. KI7 at KIN C/LK.F:
&0aivers of Constitutional 2ights not only must be
voluntary# they must be 5nowingly intelligent acts# done
with su!cient awareness of the relevant circumstances
and conseOuences.&
Typical e'amples of such compelled and pretended &bene1ts& are:
+& The use of Federal Reserve Notes to discharge my debts. , have used these
only because in -merica. there is no other /idely recogni'ed currency&
)& The use of a bank account, with my signature on the bank signature card. ,f
there is any hidden contract behind the bank signature card. my signature
thereon gives no validity to it& The signature is only for verification of identity& ,
can be obligated to fulfill no hidden or unrevealed contract /hatsoever. due to the
absence of full disclosure and voluntary consent&
Li5ewise# my use of the ban5 account thereof is due to the
absence of a ban5 not associated with the 9ederal 2eserve
system. )n general# people have been prevented from issuing
their own currencies# and such prevention is in violation of the
8nited States Constitution. 0ere there an alternative# ) would be
happy to use it. To not use any ban5 at all is impossible or very
di!cult# as everyone 5nows# in today+s mar5etplace.
0& The use of a Social Security number. The number normally assigned to
persons of sub1ect status. , use eceptionally. under duress. only because of the
etreme inconvenience of operating /ithout one in today's marketplace. /here it
is re2uested by banks. employers. lenders. and many other government
agencies and businesses& "y reason for using it is not because , /ish to
participate in the Social Security system. as , don't /ish to participate& #et it be
kno/n that , use the Social Security number assigned to me for information only&
3& The use of a driver's license. -s a free Sovereign. there is no legal re2uirement
for me to have such a license for travelling in my car& Technically. the unrevealed
legal purpose of driver's licenses is commercial in nature& Since , don't carry
passengers for hire. there is no la/ re2uiring me to have a license to travel for
my o/n pleasure and that of my family and friends& 4o/ever. because of the lack
of education of police officers on this matter. should , be stopped for any reason
and found to be /ithout a license. it is likely , /ould be ticketed and fined or
obligated to appear in court& Therefore. under duress. , carry a license to avoid
etreme inconvenience&
5& State plates on my car. Similarly. even though technically. my car does not fit
the legal definition of a 6motor vehicle.6 /hich is used for commercial purposes.
nevertheless. , have registered it /ith the state and carry the state plates on it.
because to have any other plates or no plates at all. causes me to run the risk of
police officer harassment and etreme inconvenience&
7& ast ta! returns filed. -ny ta returns , may have filed in the past. /ere filed
due to the dishonest atmosphere of fear and intimidation created by the ,nternal
Revenue Service 8,RS9 and the local assessors' offices; not because there is any
la/ re2uiring me to do so& :nce , discovered that the ,RS and other ta agencies
have been misinforming the public. , have felt it is my responsible duty to society
to terminate my voluntary participation& !ecause such returns /ere filed under
Threat. %uress. and $oercion 8T%$9. and no t/o*/ay contract /as ever signed
/ith full disclosure. there is nothing in any past filing of returns or payments that
created any valid contract& Therefore. no legal obligation on my part /as ever
created&
;& "irth #ertificate. The fact that a birth certificate /as granted to me by a local
hospital or government agency /hen , entered this /orld. is irrelevant to my
Sovereignty& No status. high or lo/. can be assigned to another person through a
piece of paper. /ithout the recipient's full kno/ledge and consent& Therefore.
such a piece of paper provides date and place information only& ,t indicates
nothing about 1urisdiction. nothing about property o/nership. nothing about
rights. and nothing about sub1ect status& The only documents that can have any
legal meaning. as it concerns my status in society. are those /hich , have signed
as an adult. /ith full kno/ledge and consent. free from misrepresentation or
coercion of any kind&
<& $arriage license. The ac2uisition of a marriage license is no/ being revealed as
being necessary only for slaves& The act of a Sovereign such as myself obtaining
such a license. through social custom and ignorance of la/. has no legal effect in
changing my status& This is because any such change in status. if any may be
supposed to occur. could happen only through a hidden and unrevealed contract
or statute& Since no hidden. unrevealed. and undisclosed information. if it eists.
can be la/fully held to be binding. it is null and void&
=& #hildren in public school. The attendance of my children in government*
supported 6public6 schools or government*controlled 6private6 schools does not
create any legal ta obligation for me. nor any other legal obligation. because ,
never signed a contract agreeing to such obligation for the supposed 6privilege6
of public school attendance&
)f any of my children have attended government supported
&public& or controlled &private& schools# such was done under
duress and not out of free will. "e it 5nown that ) regard
&compulsory state education& as a violation of the Thirteenth
mendment to the 8.S. Constitution# which states in relevant
part:
&=either slavery nor involuntary servitude# e'cept as
a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have
been duly convicted# shall e'ist within the 8nited
States# or any place sub(ect to their (urisdiction.&
+>& %eclaration of #iti&enship. -ny document , may have ever signed. in /hich ,
ans/ered 6yes6 to the 2uestion. 6-re you a U&S& citi'en?6 * cannot be used to
compromise my status as a Sovereign. nor obligate me to perform in any
manner& This is because /ithout full /ritten disclosure of the definition and
conse2uences of such supposed 6citi'enship.6 provided in a document bearing
my signature given freely /ithout misrepresentation or coercion. there can be no
legally binding contract&
) am not a &8nited States& citi%en sub(ect to its (urisdiction. The
8nited States is an entity created by the 8.S. Constitution with
(urisdiction as described on the following pages of this !davit. )
am not a &resident of#& an &inhabitant of#& a &franchise of#& a
&sub(ect of#& a &ward of#& the &property of#& the &chattel of#& or
&sub(ect to the (urisdiction of& any corporate federal government#
corporate state government# corporate county government#
corporate city government# or corporate municipal body politic
created under the authority of the 8.S. Constitution. ) am not
sub(ect to any legislation# department# or agency created by
such authorities# nor to the (urisdiction of any employees#
o!cers# or agents deriving their authority therefrom. 9urther# )
am not a sub(ect of the dministrative and Legislative rticle )E
Courts of the several states# or rticle ) Courts of the 8nited
States# or bound by precedents of such courts# deriving their
(urisdiction from said authorities. Take Notice that ) hereby
revo5e# cancel# and ma5e void ab initio any such instrument or
any presumed election made by any of the several states or the
8nited States government or any agency or department thereof#
that ) am or ever have voluntary elected to be treated as a
8nited States citi%en sub(ect to its (urisdiction or a resident of
any territory# possession# instrumentality or enclave under the
sovereignty or e'clusive (urisdiction of any of the several states
or of the 8nited States as de1ned in the 8.S. Constitution in
rticle )# Section N# Clause /K and rticle )E# Section J# Clause 7.
++& ast voter registration. Similarly. since no obligation to perform in any manner
/as ever revealed in print. as part of the re2uirements for the supposed
6privilege6 to vote for government officials. any such registration on my part
cannot be legal evidence of any obligation to perform& #ike/ise. , have granted
N: 1urisdiction over me. to any political office& ,t is my inherent right to vote on
elections or issues that , feel affect all of society; N:T because , need anyone to
rule over me& :n the contrary * , have used the voting process only to instruct my
public servants /hat a $iti'en and Sovereign /ould like done&
+)& 'se of the ()letter state code and &ip code. "y use of the )*letter state code
and 'ip code in my 6address.6 /hich is secretly codified to indicate United States
6federal 'one6 1urisdiction. has no effect /hatsoever on my Sovereign status&
Simply by receiving or sending 6mail6 through a 2uasi*federal messenger service.
the postal service. at a location indicated /ith a )*letter state code and 'ip code.
cannot place me under federal 1urisdiction or obligation& Such a presumption
/ould be ludicrous&
) use these codes only for the purposes of information and
ma5ing it more e!cacious for the 8.S. Dostal Service to deliver
my mail.
+0& 'se of semantics. There are some immature people /ith mental imbalances.
such as the craving to dominate other people. /ho mas2uerade as
6government&6 @ust because they alter definitions of /ords in the la/ books to
their supposed advantage. doesn't mean , accept those definitions& The fact that
they define the /ords 6person.6 6address.6 6mail.6 6resident.6 6motor vehicle.6
6driving.6 6passenger.6 6employee.6 6income.6 and many others. in /ays different
from the common usage. so as to be associated /ith a sub1ect or slave status.
means nothing in real life&
"ecause the courts have become entangled in the game of
semantics# be it 5nown to all courts and all parties# that if ) have
ever signed any document or spo5en any words on record# using
words de1ned by twists in the law boo5s diMerent from the
common usage# there can be no eMect whatsoever on my
Sovereign status in society thereby# nor can there be created any
obligation to perform in any manner# by the mere use of such
words. 0here the meaning in the common dictionary diMers from
the meaning in the law dictionary# it is the meaning in common
dictionary that prevails# because it is more trustworthy.
Such compelled and supposed &bene1ts& include# but are not limited
to# the aforementioned typical e'amples. $y use of such alleged
&bene1ts& is under duress only# and is with full reservation of all my
common law rights. ) have waived none of my intrinsic rights and
freedoms by my use thereof. 9urthermore# my use of such compelled
&bene1ts& may be temporary# until better alternatives become
available# practical# and widely recogni%ed.
FEDERAL URISDI!TION
)t is further relevant to this !davit that any violation of my 2ights#
9reedom# or Droperty by the 8.S. federal government# or any agent
thereof# would be an illegal and unlawful e'cess# clearly outside the
limited boundaries of federal (urisdiction. $y understanding is that the
(urisdiction of the 8.S. federal government is de1ned by rticle )#
Section N# Clause /K of the 8.S. Constitution# Ouoted as follows:
&The Congress shall have the power . . . To e'ercise
e'clusive legislation in all cases whatsoever# over such
district C=*T EBCEE<)=> TE= $)LES S?82EF as may# by
cession of particular states and the acceptance of
Congress# become the seat of the >overnment of the
8nited States# [<istrict of Columbia; and to e'ercise li5e
authority over all places purchased by the consent of the
legislature of the state in which the same shall be# for the
Erection of 9orts# $aga%ines# rsenals# doc5 yards and
other needful "uildingsH nd 4 To ma5e all laws which shall
be necessary and proper for carrying into E'ecution the
foregoing Dowers...& [emphasis added;
and rticle )E# Section J# Clause 7:
&The Congress shall have the Dower to dispose of and ma5e
all needful 2ules and 2egulations respecting the Territory or
other Droperty belonging to the 8nited StatesH and nothing
in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Dre(udice
any Claims of the 8nited States# or of any particular State.&
The de1nition of the &8nited States& being used here# then# is limited to
its territorie":
+9 The %istrict of $olumbia
)9 $ommon/ealth of Puerto Rico
09 U&S& (irgin ,slands
39 Auam
59 -merican Samoa
79 Northern "ariana ,slands
;9 Trust Territory of the Pacific ,slands
<9 "ilitary bases /ithin the several states
=9 Federal agencies /ithin the several states
)t does not include the several states t#e$"elve"# as is con1rmed by
the following cites:
&0e have in our political system a >overnment of the
8nited States and a government of each of the several
States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the
others# and each has citi%ens of its own who owe it
allegiance# and whose rights# within its (urisdiction# it must
protect. The same person may be at the same time a
citi%en of the 8nited States and a Citi%en of a State# but his
rights of citi%enship under one of these governments will
be diMerent from those he has under the other.& Slaughter
@ouse Cases United State" v". !r%ik"#ank# L7 8.S. -I7
C/NK-F.
&T@E 8=)TE< STTES >*EE2=$E=T )S 9*2E)>=
C*2D*2T)*= 0)T@ 2ESDECT T* STTE.& [emphasis
added; Vol%$e &': !or(%" %ri" Sec. P/KN-: =3 re:
$erriam JQ =.E. -.- /II/ S.Ct./LKJ# I/ L.Ed.7NK.
This is further con1rmed by the following Ouote from the )nternal
2evenue Service:
9ederal (urisdiction &includes the <istrict of Columbia# the
Commonwealth of Duerto 2ico# the Eirgin )slands# >uam#
and merican Samoa.& 4 )nternal 2evenue Code Section
J/7CeF.
)n le)al terminology# the word *incl%de"* means *i" li$ited to.*
0hen referring to this &<istrict& 8nited States# the )nternal 2evenue
Code uses the term *+ITHIN* the 8nited States. 0hen referring to the
several States# the )nternal 2evenue Code uses the term *+ITHOUT*
the 8nited States.
<o%ens# perhaps hundreds# of court cases prove that federal
(urisdiction is limited to the few federal territory areas above indicated.
9or e'ample# in two Supreme Court cases# it was decided:
&The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not
e'tend into the territorial limits of the states# but have
force only in the <istrict of Columbia# and other places that
are within the e'clusive (urisdiction of the national
government#& !a#a v. United State"# /-7 8.S.# at 7/-.
&0e thin5 a proper e'amination of this sub(ect will show
that the 8nited States never held any municipal
sovereignty# (urisdiction# or right of soil in and to the
territory# of which labama or any of the new States were
formed...&
&[";ecause# the 8nited States have no constitutional
capacity to e'ercise municipal (urisdiction# sovereignty# or
eminent domain# within the limits of a State or elsewhere#
e'cept in the cases in which it is e'pressly granted...&
&labama is therefore entitled to the sovereignty and
(urisdiction over all the territory within her limits# sub(ect to
the common law#& ,ollard v. Ha)an# II 8.S. 77/# 77J#
77N# 77L.
Li5ewise# Title /N of the 8nited States Code at PK speci1es that the
&territorial (urisdiction& of the 8nited States e'tends only o%t"ide the
boundaries of lands belonging to any of the several States.
T#ere-ore# in addition to the fact that no unrevealed federal contract
can obligate me to perform in any manner without my fully informed
and uncoerced consent# li5ewise# no federal statutes or regulations
apply to me or have any (urisdiction over me. ) hereby a!rm that ) do
not reside or wor5 in any federal territory of the &<istrict& 8nited
States# and that therefore no 8.S. federal government statutes or
regulations have any authority over me.
,O+ERS AND !ONTRA!TUAL OBLI.ATIONS OF
UNITED STATES AND STATE .OVERN/ENT OFFI!IALS
ll 8nited States and State government o!cials are hereby put on
notice that ) e'pect them to have recorded valid *aths of *!ce in
accordance with the 8.S. Constitution# rticle E):
&The Senators and 2epresentatives before mentioned# and
the members of the several State Legislatures# and all
e'ecutive and (udicial o!cers# both of the 8nited States
and of the several States# shall be bound by oath or
a!rmation to support this Constitution...&
) understand that by their *aths of *!ce all 8.S. and State
government o!cials are contractually bound by the 8.S. Constitution
as formulated by its framers# and not as &interpreted#& subverted# or
corrupted by the 8.S. Supreme Court or other courts.
ccording to the =inth mendment to the 8.S. Constitution:
&The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall
not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by
the people.&
and the Tenth mendment to the 8.S. Constitution:
&The powers not delegated to the 8nited States by the
Constitution# nor prohibited by it to the States# are
reserved to the States respectively# or to the people.&
Thus# my understanding from these mendments is that the powers of
all 8.S. and State government o!cials are limited to those speci1cally
granted by the 8.S. Constitution.
) further understand that any laws# statutes# ordinances# regulations#
rules# and procedures contrary to the 8.S. Constitution# as written by
its framers# are null and void# as e'pressed in the Si'teenth merican
:urisprudence Second Edition# Section /KK:
&The general misconception is that any statute passed by
legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the
law of the land. The 8.S. Constitution is the supreme law of
the land# and any statute# to be valid# must be in
agreement. )t is impossible for both the Constitution and a
law violating it to be validH one must prevail. This is
succinctly stated as follows:
+The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute#
though having the form and name of law# is in reality no
law# but is wholly void# and ineMective for any purposeH
since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its
enactment# and not merely from the date of the decision so
branding it. n unconstitutional law# in legal contemplation#
is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a
statute leaves the Ouestion that it purports to settle (ust as
it would be had the statute not been enacted.+
+Since an unconstitutional law is void# the general
principles follow that it imposes no duties# confers no right#
creates no o!ce# bestows no power or authority on
anyone# aMords no protection# and (usti1es no acts
performed under it...+
+ void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. n
unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any
e'isting valid law. )ndeed# insofar as a statute runs counter
to the fundamental law of the land# it is superseded
thereby.+
+=o one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no
courts are bound to enforce it.+& [emphasis added;
and as e'pressed once again in the 8.S. Constitution# rticle E):
&This Constitution# and the laws of the 8nited States which
shall be made in pursuance thereofH and all treaties made#
or which shall be made# under the authority of the 8nited
States# shall be the supreme law of the landH and the
(udges in every State shall be bound thereby# anything in
the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary
notwithstanding.&
ll 8.S. and State government o!cials are therefore hereby put on
notice that any violations of their contractual obligations to act in
accordance with their 8.S. Constitution# may result in prosecution to
the full e'tent of the law# as well as the application of all available legal
remedies to recover damages suMered by any parties damaged by any
actions of 8.S. and State government o!cials in violation of the 8.S.
Constitution.
REVO!ATION OF ,O+ER OF ATTORNE0
9urthermore# ) hereby revo5e# rescind# and ma5e void ab initio# all
powers of attorney# in fact or otherwise# implied in law or otherwise#
signed either by me or anyone else# as it pertains to the Social Security
number assigned to me# GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG as it pertains to my
birth certi1cate# marriage or business license# or any other licenses or
certi1cates issued by any and all government or Ouasi4governmental
entities# due to the use of various elements of fraud by said agencies
to attempt to deprive me of my Sovereignty andAor property.
) hereby waive# cancel# repudiate# and refuse to 5nowingly accept any
alleged &bene1t& or gratuity associated with any of the aforementioned
licenses# numbers# or certi1cates. ) do hereby revo5e and rescind all
powers of attorney# in fact or otherwise# signed by me or otherwise#
implied in law or otherwise# with or without my consent or 5nowledge#
as it pertains to any and all property# real or personal# corporeal or
incorporeal# obtained in the past# present# or future. ) am the sole and
absolute legal owner and possess allodial title to any and all such
property.
Take Notice that ) also revo5e# cancel# and ma5e void ab initio all
powers of attorney# in fact# in presumption# or otherwise# signed either
by me or anyone else# claiming to act on my behalf# with or without my
consent# as such power of attorney pertains to me or any property
owned by me# by# but not limited to# any and all OuasiAcolorable#
public# governmental entities or corporations on the grounds of
constructive fraud# concealment# and nondisclosure of pertinent facts.
) a!rm that all of the foregoing is true and correct. ) a!rm that ) am of
lawful age and am competent to ma5e this !davit. ) hereby a!' my
own signature to all of the a!rmations in this entire document with
e'plicit reservation of all my unalienable rights and my speci1c
common law right not to be bound by any contract or obligation which
) have not entered into 5nowingly# willingly# voluntarily# and without
misrepresentation# duress# or coercion.
The use of notary below is for identi1cation only# and such use does
=*T grant any (urisdiction to anyone.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT.
Subscribed and sworn# without pre(udice# and with all rights reserved#
CD2)=T =$E "EL*0F
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG#
Drincipal# by Special ppearance# in Dropria Dersona# proceeding Sui
:uris.
$y @and and $ar5 as Subscriber CS)>= =$E
"EL*0F
<ate:GGGGGGGGGGGGG Common Law
Seal:GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
*n this GGGGGGday ofGGGGGGGGGGGG# /LGGGG# before me# the undersigned# a
=otary Dublic in and for GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGCstateF# personally
appeared the above4signed# 5nown to me to be the one whose name is
signed on this instrument# and has ac5nowledged to me that sAhe has
e'ecuted the same.
Signed:GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
Drinted =ame:GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
<ate:GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
$y Commission E'pires:GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
[@ome; [2eport <irectory;