In Service NDT for
Large Composite
Structures
Dr Martin Wall
ESR, National NDT Centre
NNDTC, Milton, Oxfordshire
IOM3 Workshop Living with Composites
NDT Methods for Large Scale Composites
Port Talbot, Wales 3 July 2007
www.esrtechnology.com
ESR Technology Ltd
www.nndtc.com
Introduction
Composites used in increasing range of applications
Comprehensive NDT at Manufacture
NDT in Service is more difficult and less widely done
Traditionally conservatively designed to allow for inservice damage
Perception of difficulty to inspect in service and
limitations of defect assessment methods have limited
uptake of composites
Increasingly used in large structural applications
With recent developments there are a range of NDT
methods that can be used in-service
ESR Technology Ltd
Scope of Talk
Introduction
Why inspect in-service
Challenges for in-service NDE
Defect Types
Standards
Current NDT practice
Potential NDE Methods
Examples
Information Sources
Future Developments
Conclusions
ESR Technology Ltd
Why inspect ?
Composites are used in an increasing range of
applications, increasingly structural, NDT in-service
cannot be ignored
Satisfy Quality Assurance
Legal/ Regulatory requirements
In-service damage
Extend product life
Safety critical
Condition of component
ESR Technology Ltd
What to inspect
Components
Tanks (above or below
ground)
Vessels
Pipes
Structures
Civil
Offshore
Systems
Pressure
Actuators
Rotating equipment
Safety
etc.
ESR Technology Ltd
Challenges - In-Service NDT
Thickness
Access
Coupling & surface condition
Area
Signal attenuation and scattering
Inhomogeneous and anisotropic structure
Lack of adequate standards
Interpretation of inspection results (PoD)
Familiarity with metallic structures
Increased reliance on operator experience
ESR Technology Ltd
Inspection Issues Large Structures
How much do we know?
Location of damage
What damage may occur
ESR Technology Ltd
Where to inspect
Time available for inspection.
Downtime.
Industry
Integrity required
Data analysis
Performance required
(Sensitivity, speed, coverage
and reliability POD, false calls)
Cost
Inspection Strategy Large Structures
Global inspection
methods
Monitoring (e.g. Acoustic
Emission)
Fast screening with
detailed inspection of
indications found
Risk-based inspection
Locations of likely
damage known
Slow crawler In its own
time
ESR Technology Ltd
Defect Types In Service and Installation
Composites are damage
tolerant.
Variety of in-service defects
are possible
Most significant are
Delaminations
Impact damage
Matrix cracking
Weepage
Environmental ingress
Thermal damage and
lightning strike
Disbonding joints and
repair applications
Courtesy CompositeNDT
ESR Technology
Technology Ltd
ESR
Ltd
Courtesy NPL/Boeing
Loss of thickness due to
erosion or severe chemical
attack
Other failure mechanisms are
also present, e.g. fibre failure
but less of a concern.
Failure Example
ESR Technology Ltd
GRE pipe failure mechanisms
matrix cracking and delamination
ESR Technology Ltd
NDT Standards Composites
ISO14692
Norsok
In-house specifications (Shell,
BP)
Generic NDT procedures
Escape craft NDT procedures
CPD4D generic NDT procedures. Offshore
focus. Ultrasonics, thermography, laser
shearography (ESR, DTI)
NPL/ QinetiQ ultrasonic C-Scan
procedures, draft standard
ESR Technology
Technology Ltd
ESR
Ltd
Example ISO 14692
ESR Technology Ltd
Potential NDT methods
Visual
Ultrasonics
Radiography
Thermography
Laser shearography
Courtesy Anne Birt QinetiQ
Coin and tap testing
Microwave
Acoustic
Other
ESR Technology Ltd
Data presentation
Image
C-Scan Map from above
surface
A-Scan Signal v arrival time
B-Scan through thickness
slice
Depth scan or Time-of-Flight
Digital data set
Courtesy NPL, QinetiQ
ESR Technology Ltd
Similar presentations used
irrespective of NDT method
used
Large area Inspections
Modern integrated
systems software
allows combination
of images for large
area inspections e.g.
Thermography
MOSAIC (TW Inc.)
Laser shearography
Ultrasonic C-Scan
Ultrasonic phased
array
Wheelprobes (e.g.
rapidscan)
ESR Technology Ltd
Rapid C-Scanning
Wheel
probes e.g
(RapidScan)
or Phased
Arrays
Air coupled
probes
ESR Technology Ltd
Laser Shearography
ESR Technology Ltd
Thermography
ESR Technology Ltd
Example Ultrasonic B-Scan and TOFD
Erosion and wall loss, liner Damage, GRP
vessels and pipe.
Pipe wall loss through
severe chemical attack
ESR Technology Ltd
Microwaves
ESR Technology Ltd
Acousto-Ultrasonics T-Scout
Courtesy Physical Acoustics
ESR Technology Ltd
X-Radiography
Courtesy Anne Birt QinetiQ
ESR Technology Ltd
Coin and Tap Testing
ESR Technology Ltd
Technique Selection
ESR Technology Ltd
Component
Geometry
Defect Type
Thickness
Access
Surface equipment
Material quality
Time available, no of components, area
Inspection performance (Sensitivity, speed,
coverage and reliability)
Cost
General advice in standards such as ISO
14692. More detailed advice MMS15 IKB
www.mms15.com
www.netcomposites.com/compositesndt
Example - Aerospace
ESR Technology
Technology Ltd
ESR
Ltd
High percentage application of
composites
In structural applications
Up to 60% for aircraft structures
NDT well established. Fast and
global
Specialised NDT methods routinely
used in manufacture
Ultrasonic C-Scan, B-Scan image
processing
Laser shearography
Transient thermography
Laser ultrasound
Remote acoustic impact Doppler
(RAID)
Automated Tap testing
In-Service Same approach
possible in-service if at
maintenance facility
Field and difficult access
inspections may need different
approach: e.g. phased array or
wheel probes
Example Marine Hulls
Significant wave
loading
Range of potential
defects
Impact damage
Disbonding from
core
Delamination
Core splice
Images courtesy Roger Gregory, www.compositendt.com
ESR Technology Ltd
Laser shearography
has become accepted
as main inspection
method using
vaccuum hood. e.g.
RNLI Lifeboats
Particularly good for
repairs. Sensitive to
level of adhesion
NDT Methods Offshore Composites
Visual
Manual ultrasonics
Radiography
Thermography
Specialised NDT methods trialed
in some applications
Microwave inspection
Acousto-ultrasonics (T-Scout)
Laser shearography
NDT Applicability depends on
thickness, and surface and
material quality
ESR Technology
Technology Ltd
ESR
Ltd
Example NDT Composite end Connections
Different types - Adhesive,
threaded, keylock ISO 14692
NDT options currently limited,
particularly for adhesive joints
Focus on good joint preparation
Reliance on proof testing
Important to integrity
NDT required all parts of connection
(GRP, metallic)
Access difficult for NDT,
particularly for adhesive joints
ESR Technology
Technology Ltd
ESR
Ltd
Nozzle and flange connections can
also be an issue
Example - Composites Offshore
Applications include
pipelines
risers and piping systems (e.g. firewater mains)
tubings and casings;
process equipment; tanks and
vessels
Structures- access equipment (stairs
and gratings);
lifeboats
Mud mats (sub-sea)
protective covers (sub-sea)
Tanks and vessels
Lifeboats
Repairs to metallic pipework
ESR Technology
Technology Ltd
ESR
Ltd
Example - NDT of Composites Offshore
(Cont)
Mainly GRP
Variable wall thickness (2-50mm) and
section
Connections, nozzles and flanges an Issue
Variable material properties and quality
NDT may be affected by high porosity or
poor surface finish
NDT methods difficult to apply in thicker
sections
ESR Technology
Technology Ltd
ESR
Ltd
Access for NDT an issue. Piping often
close packed e.g water treatment
Special issues in some applications
escape craft, firewater mains, lined vessels
etc.
Composites in FPSOs
Floating Production Offloading and
Storage Vessels (FPSOs) are used
increasingly for offshore
Significant increase in use of
composites on FPSOs
Firewater mains
Water treatment
Pipes and vessels etc
e.g Petrobras P50 FPSO
Lightweight and efficient use of space
a particular issue.
Long GRP Lengths. Significant
movement. Fatigue failure an issue
ESR Technology
Technology Ltd
ESR
Ltd
NDT of Composites FPSO Background
Minimising topside weight is a key
issue for FPSOs and floating
installations.
This together with good corrosion
resistance, flexibility and continuous
manufacture has lead to an increased
use of fibrereinforced composite
materials (FRP).
Limited guidance is available on NDT
of composites in offshore GRP
standards notably ISO14692 and
NORSOK.
NDT is not widely used. Increasing
requirement due to service issues.
ESR Technology
Technology Ltd
ESR
Ltd
NDT Composites Information Sources
Offshore standards ISO, Norsok
MMS15 Knowledge Base
www.mms15.com or via
NetComposites site
MMS13 Defect Assessment of
composites (NPL, ESR)
NPL/ QinetiQ ultrasonic C-Scan
procedures, draft standard
CPD4D generic NDT procedures.
Offshore focus. Ultrasonics,
thermography, laser shearography
(ESR, DTI)
Adhesives Toolkit (ESR, NPL, DTI)
ESR Technology
Technology Ltd
ESR
Ltd
Defect Assessment - Oil & Gas
Defect type
Matrix cracking
Defect assessment
procedure
Damage mechanics
approach to estimate
density
Lack of adhesive Simply area of de-bond
(< 30% of bond area OK)
Comment
Procedure in
development and under
test
Used in ISO 14692
Loss of
thickness
Simple 1-D assessment
Very conservative for
using estimated minimum localised defects
wall
Delamination
Linked to damage
mechanics plus also
fracture mechanics
approached
ESR Technology Ltd
Damage approach under
development. For fracture
approach difficult to
quantify critical values
NDT Simulation and POD models
Simulated ultrasonic C-Scan data from ultrasonic POD Model (ESAPOD)
developed by NNDTC for ESA [42]. On the left is the POD curve obtained from a
spot the ball POD trial carried out using the simulated ultrasonic C-scan data on
the right.Body text goes here (Arial 28 - font size can change as required)
ESR Technology Ltd
Future Developments
Improvements in rapid screening methods and
monitoring techniques
Improved defect assessment methods
Application of risk-based methods. Identify critical areas
Reliability and performance of composite NDT Methods
POD
Use of simulation and NDT reliability models
Improved standards for in-service composite NDT
ESR Technology Ltd
Conclusions
A range of NDE methods are now available for in-service NDT of
composites
The position has advanced significantly since 5 years ago
In-service NDT is more difficult than in manufacture
Large structures pose particular difficulties for inspection
The choice of NDT method will depend on a number of factors including:
access, defect type, thickness, surface condition, material quality
Potential strategies include fast screening, global methods, monitoring or
application of risk-based inspetion methods depending how much is
known on type and location of damage and integrity requirements.
Most procedures are proprietary. A number have been standardised.
Information is limited in industry standards such as ISO 14692
A number of information sources are available to assist industry users.
Including the MMS15 IKB www.mms15.com or
www.netcomposites.com/compositesndt
More work is needed on development of defect assessment methods
ESR Technology Ltd
END
www.nndtc.com
ESR Technology Ltd