Performance Appraisals
Confidential Report (Year 2017-18) -2nd Half
Employee Name: RAJESH JAKKA Employee No: 110413014
Department: Engineering Designation: Senior Engineer
Project: All Qualification(s): M.Tech (SE&NDM)
Date of Joining: 09-12-2013 Location: Visakhapatnam
Prev. IDDC Total
Appraisal Year: 2017-18 Experience
3 4 7
IDDC Engineers Pvt Ltd believes that self-development is a continuous process and every Associate in
the Organization should develop his/her knowledge and skills on a continuous basis. The purpose of
this appraisal exercise is to ensure individual as well as Organizational Development. Such
performance review gives us an insight in mapping the individual aspirations with the Organizational
requirements.
By way of this, all the Associates have an opportunity to introspect objectively on their performance
during the period under review. The following format enables you to highlight the accomplishments
against the Key Role Activities’ from all perspectives.
The Performance Appraisal would be done by Reporting Officer and/or Reviewer (if any)
Reporting
Max. Reviewer's
No. Performance Criteria Officer Justification
Score Score
Score
Performance on Job 25 23 23
1 Consider how successful the employee is in accomplishing the
task assigned within the deadline
Quality of work 15 14 14
2
Consider accuracy, thoroughness, effectiveness
Functional Knowledge 10 9 9
3 Consider the extent of understanding of the employee’s area of
work, products & services of the company
Responsiveness to
10 10 10
feedback
4
Consider the extent to which employee acts on feedback &
makes adjustments
Teamwork 10 10 10
5 Consider the extent to which the employee works as a team
member in goal achievement
Operational
6 10 8 8
Communication
1
Performance Appraisals
Confidential Report (Year 2017-18) -2nd Half
Ability to expresses ideas clearly & effectively and adjusts the
language to the needs & situation.
Discipline 10 10 10
7 Consider punctuality to work, attendance, behavior, adherence
to organization’s Rules & Policies
8 Organization Core Values 10 8 8
Ensuring the internalization and practice of Organization Core Values.
Total Score 100 92 92
Major Strengths & Weaknesses (To be filled by the employee)
Strength:
1. Willing to work for any project whether it is known to me or not.
2. Try to understand the deliverables of the project and submit the same.
3. Teamwork.
4. Strong work ethic.
5. Planning & Organizational skills.
Weakness:
1. Lack of judgement/ decision making.
Reviewer Comment:
Has been procative in the work and needs to improve written and oral communication skills
Has to be affirmative in his approach for ensuring performance for team members.
Major Contributions during the Performance Assessment Period
1. Identifies and resolves problems such that the user feels that the problem is resolved
2. Answers questions and deals with all customers with respect and understanding.
3. Always interacts with customers from a customer service perspective
Reviewer Comment:
Good at issue resolving and has to update the knowledge of the works and needs to improve
communication with client to the point, with clarity.
Staff development & training needs for the next rating period
Systems and equipments required.
Training before start of every major work
Reviewer Comment:
Systems provided, New equipment procured and if any additional equipment is proposed it can
belooked into
If team leader plans any training necessary for the team members can be provided
2
Performance Appraisals
Confidential Report (Year 2017-18) -2nd Half
General/Specific Comments & Recommendation (To be filled by the employee)
HR, GRE policies are not updated & following-
For SSP, what is the actual cost of share?
On what basis previous increments made & surprisingly from this year it was mentioned that
12% is the maximum for the better performer. I am unhappy with the decision made.
GRE Policy:
I don’t understand the clause 2.2 point no.3.
Project definitions and allowed expenses:
All the reimbursement will be made only for the tax paid bills submitted: that is not possible in
all cases.
For major projects Lodging clause mentioned is not accepted.
Local travel allowance for two wheeler Rs 3 / km travelled are not following.
Working hours, Weekly off and General rules:
3.3 General office timing mentioned for all offices shall be 10.00am, wheras vizag office timing is
on 9.30am.
In clause 3.4 mentioned that in case the staff has to work extended timing to complete the work,
the compensation shall be availed immediately the next day.
Can we follow that
4.1 Leaves & Concession: We are not following as per the clause mentioned, can we follow that.
4.3 Based on the situation the leave can be sanctioned, we are not following this too.
4.4 Leave incentive for site deployment has to modified.
4.5 I missed the clause in GRE document.
Annexure -2 attached to GRE policy is not available for Vizag office
HR policy:
4.3 All staff is eligible for benefits like paid leave, PF (as per the PF act), etc from the date they
3
Performance Appraisals
Confidential Report (Year 2017-18) -2nd Half
become permanent staff. Any leave or absence during probation /
At the time of retirement or resign you will pay based on leaves available?
5. Salary Structure:
TA travelling allowance, a fixed amount of Rs 1800: but in the pay slip given to me it is
mentioned as 800 only
5.7 Increment shall be based on performance and shall not be mandatory or uniform to all
the staff. Increments shall be declared before 15th May of every year and applicable from 1st
April of that year.
Last year & this year the increments are applicable from june only.
No update about arrears:
How can you provide PF to one branch without informing & asking other branches
From August onwards delhi office is getting PF, but I don’t have the information regarding this.
Monthly salary should be credited before 10th of every month
Rules to be made for all not for individual
Reviewer Comment:
All the issues can be attended to and calrified at the office level
We need to ensure the the HR & GRE document has to be circulated to all offices before 15 th April
looking into some aspects mentioned above and change it if necessary after discussion with all
offices to ensure such things are not brought out again
Name & Signatures
RAJESH JAKKA
Name & Signature of Name & Signature of
Employee Reviewer
For Corporate office Use
Final Score
4
Performance Appraisals
Confidential Report (Year 2017-18) -2nd Half
Very Good
Good
Final Rating
Average
Poor
Note:
Reporting Officer/ Reviewer to moderate on marks only. The Rating will be given at the
Corporate Office level.
