Scribd
Upload
31 views2 pages

Prostate Comp

The student, Bianca Tester, was evaluated on her IMRT planning competency for prostate cancer treatment. She was rated as satisfactory in all tasks by her clinical instructor, including discussing the plan with physicians, image registration, contouring, beam placement, dose optimization, plan analysis and documentation. The evaluator commented that Bianca is getting more comfortable with image registration software and grasping different IMRT technique options for prostate cases. Overall, Bianca passed the competency evaluation.

Uploaded by

api-404851310
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
31 views2 pages

Prostate Comp

The student, Bianca Tester, was evaluated on her IMRT planning competency for prostate cancer treatment. She was rated as satisfactory in all tasks by her clinical instructor, including discussing the plan with physicians, image registration, contouring, beam placement, dose optimization, plan analysis and documentation. The evaluator commented that Bianca is getting more comfortable with image registration software and grasping different IMRT technique options for prostate cases. Overall, Bianca passed the competency evaluation.

Uploaded by

api-404851310
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Responses About You - Details - "IMRT Planning Competency Evaluation"

Print

1 of 3

Evaluation by: Clinical Instructors (SANCHEZ, Daryl)


Evaluation of: Students (Tester, Bianca)
Evaluation Period: 7/3/2018
Survey Completed: 7/3/2018 4:07:53 PM CT
Add your comments

Select the external beam IMRT planning competency from the drop down menu below:

 Prostate IMRT

If Other competency, specify the type here:

 No response

Please assign each task a score of Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory.


Unsatisfactory in any essential task constitutes competency failure.
The student will repeat the competency at a later date.

 Discusses the plan prescription with the physician. - Satisfactory [2 pts]


 Loads the patient imaging studies into the planning computer. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Accurately fuses image data sets together. - Satisfactory (Additional Comment: Bianca is
getting more comfortable navigating with MIM.) [2 pts]
 Contours the appropriate anatomy on the image data set. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Successfully places the isocenter using simulation data. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Correctly generates optimal beam angles for specific anatomical area. - Satisfactory [2
pts]
 Generates plan with appropriate energies. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Able to manipulate ROI/PTV constraints in the optimizer to obtain an optimal plan. -
Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Accurately optimizes and generates a concomitant boost plan. - N/A
 Accurately generates an individual DVH or composite DVH (for correct # of fractions). -
Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Understands the concept of prescribing to a point vs. prescribing to a volume and is able
to adjust the plan % normalization as needed. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Communicates effectively with physician for plan review and makes changes as
requested. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Exports/Prints appropriate plan data. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Accurately generates the QA for the plan. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Enters in correct parameters for patient chart. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Performs pretreatment checks/calculations. - N/A (Additional Comment: Physics is in charge
of the checks/calculations at our facility)
 Observes IMRT QA and analysis of QA. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Observes patient treatment. - Satisfactory (Additional Comment: Bianca is grasping multiple
technique options for IMRTprostates) [2 pts]

MEAN: 2.00 (out of possible 2), POINTS: 32, % SCORE: 100.0%

Overall rating:

 Pass [2 pts]

MEAN: 2.00 (out of possible 2), POINTS: 2, % SCORE: 100.0%

Total points for all rating scale questions: 34


Mean percentage score for all rating scale questions: 100.0%
(Each main question equally weighted)

Responses as of 8/3/2018 4:27:20 PM CT

You might also like