Scribd
Upload
71 views2 pages

H-N Comp

The clinical instructor evaluated a student's competency in head and neck IMRT planning. The student received satisfactory ratings for all tasks, including discussing the plan with physicians, image registration, contouring, beam placement, dose optimization, and plan evaluation. The instructor commented that the student ensures proper volume labeling, uses appropriate image sets, contours normal tissues well, considers special circumstances, and clearly explains plan changes. The student passed the overall competency evaluation with a 100% score.

Uploaded by

api-404851310
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
71 views2 pages

H-N Comp

The clinical instructor evaluated a student's competency in head and neck IMRT planning. The student received satisfactory ratings for all tasks, including discussing the plan with physicians, image registration, contouring, beam placement, dose optimization, and plan evaluation. The instructor commented that the student ensures proper volume labeling, uses appropriate image sets, contours normal tissues well, considers special circumstances, and clearly explains plan changes. The student passed the overall competency evaluation with a 100% score.

Uploaded by

api-404851310
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Responses About You - Details - "IMRT Planning Competency Evaluation"

Print

5 of 6

Evaluation by: Clinical Instructors (POTEET, Leslie K.)


Evaluation of: Students (Tester, Bianca)
Evaluation Period: 9/28/2018
Survey Completed: 9/28/2018 3:13:28 PM CT
Add your comments

Select the external beam IMRT planning competency from the drop down menu below:

 H & N IMRT

If Other competency, specify the type here:

 No response

Please assign each task a score of Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory.


Unsatisfactory in any essential task constitutes competency failure.
The student will repeat the competency at a later date.

 Discusses the plan prescription with the physician. - Satisfactory (Additional Comment:
Ensures volumes to be covered are labeled properly) [2 pts]
 Loads the patient imaging studies into the planning computer. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Accurately fuses image data sets together. - Satisfactory (Additional Comment: Fuses
appropriate diagnostic studies with treatment plan CT) [2 pts]
 Contours the appropriate anatomy on the image data set. - Satisfactory (Additional Comment:
Has been doing normal OAR contours on most of our patients) [2 pts]
 Successfully places the isocenter using simulation data. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Correctly generates optimal beam angles for specific anatomical area. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Generates plan with appropriate energies. - Satisfactory (Additional Comment: Takes special
circumstances into consideration, i.e Pacemaker) [2 pts]
 Able to manipulate ROI/PTV constraints in the optimizer to obtain an optimal plan. -
Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Accurately optimizes and generates a concomitant boost plan. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Accurately generates an individual DVH or composite DVH (for correct # of fractions). -
Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Understands the concept of prescribing to a point vs. prescribing to a volume and is able to
adjust the plan % normalization as needed. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Communicates effectively with physician for plan review and makes changes as requested. -
Satisfactory (Additional Comment: Does a really good job of explaining why she did what she did to
accomplish an acceptable) [2 pts]
 Exports/Prints appropriate plan data. - Satisfactory (Additional Comment: Definitely can do this
but I only require it on plans she is comping on. She isn't here to do our grunt work for us on other
plans. ) [2 pts]
 Accurately generates the QA for the plan. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Enters in correct parameters for patient chart. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Performs pretreatment checks/calculations. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Observes IMRT QA and analysis of QA. - Satisfactory [2 pts]
 Observes patient treatment. - Satisfactory [2 pts]

MEAN: 2.00 (out of possible 2), POINTS: 36, % SCORE: 100.0%

Overall rating:

 Pass [2 pts]

MEAN: 2.00 (out of possible 2), POINTS: 2, % SCORE: 100.0%

Total points for all rating scale questions: 38


Mean percentage score for all rating scale questions: 100.0%
(Each main question equally weighted)

Responses as of 10/7/2018 4:47:01 PM CT

You might also like