Scribd
Upload
43 views2 pages

Project Report Marksheet Student ID: Date:: Marker's Name Total Mark % 35

The student received a poor overall mark of 35% for their project report. Specifically: - The abstract, introduction, and literature review sections were weak with little structure and missing important details. - For the research-oriented sections of the project, there was no discussion of methodology, data collection, analysis, or results shown. - The conclusions drawn were also poor with little critical reflection. - Presentation and written English quality needed significant improvement, with many spelling errors and poor formatting/structure.

Uploaded by

Viraat Sewraj
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
43 views2 pages

Project Report Marksheet Student ID: Date:: Marker's Name Total Mark % 35

The student received a poor overall mark of 35% for their project report. Specifically: - The abstract, introduction, and literature review sections were weak with little structure and missing important details. - For the research-oriented sections of the project, there was no discussion of methodology, data collection, analysis, or results shown. - The conclusions drawn were also poor with little critical reflection. - Presentation and written English quality needed significant improvement, with many spelling errors and poor formatting/structure.

Uploaded by

Viraat Sewraj
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Project Report Marksheet

Student ID: yoyohoney Date:

Section A – Complete this section in all cases

Student’s family name zokris Student’s forename zok


Student’s number yoyohoney Student’s campus Mauritius
Marker’s name Grand malin TOTAL MARK % 35

Section B – Complete this section in all cases

Maximum Mark
Parameter mark awarded Comments
2 Not good…no mention of important
Abstract 5
results, methodology used
Introduction and 4 Very unclear…no aims and project
10
Background scope defined
3 Very poor literature review – no
Literature review;
10 structure, no related works. No in-text
references & citations
citation done
Problem definition 10 4 Poor

Section C – ONLY Complete this section if the project is a research or review-oriented topic

Maximum Mark
Parameter mark awarded Comments
10 No methodology discussed, no details
Collection and analysis
30 about data collection and data analysis.
of data
No results shown.
Evaluation/discussion of 3 Very poor. No results shown
10
data/ results
Conclusion with critical 3 Poor
reflection on problem as 10
defined

Section D – ONLY Complete this section if the project is product/prototype-based work

Maximum Mark
Parameter mark awarded Comments
Detailed requirements
analysis and design 10
specifications
Product 20
Product evaluation 10
Conclusions with critical
reflection on problem as 10
defined

Section E – Complete this section in all cases

Maximum Mark
Parameter mark awarded Comments
Presentation of report and 6 Poor formatting, and lots of spelling
15
quality of written English mistakes. Poor report structure

You might also like