The paper reported 46% on Chameleon for GCN. I used the filtered Chameleon dataset, and the performance is only 41%, just as bad as other models. The hyperparameters used are from the paper.
The author didn't reply to this inconsistence. Not providing Chameleon dataset in the github might be the reason.
The paper reported 46% on Chameleon for GCN. I used the filtered Chameleon dataset, and the performance is only 41%, just as bad as other models. The hyperparameters used are from the paper.
The author didn't reply to this inconsistence. Not providing Chameleon dataset in the github might be the reason.