Hi all! First of all, thank you for building and maintaining authlib. It's great!
Any thoughts on supporting Client ID Metadata Documents, including discovery on the provider side? I know you all prefer to wait on drafts until they're published as full RECs, so I'm not expecting anything right now, just wanted to get the conversation started.
Along with DPoP (#315 (comment)) and PAR (#724), CIMD is required by ATProto (ie Bluesky), which is now a substantial ecosystem, tens of millions of users.
I might consider implementing this and filing a PR or two, starting with the provider side. I'd follow https://docs.authlib.org/en/stable/community/contribute.html . Let me know if there's anything else I should be aware of!
Hi all! First of all, thank you for building and maintaining authlib. It's great!
Any thoughts on supporting Client ID Metadata Documents, including discovery on the provider side? I know you all prefer to wait on drafts until they're published as full RECs, so I'm not expecting anything right now, just wanted to get the conversation started.
Along with DPoP (#315 (comment)) and PAR (#724), CIMD is required by ATProto (ie Bluesky), which is now a substantial ecosystem, tens of millions of users.
I might consider implementing this and filing a PR or two, starting with the provider side. I'd follow https://docs.authlib.org/en/stable/community/contribute.html . Let me know if there's anything else I should be aware of!