Using using namespace gismo and non gsXxxx stuff.
#795
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
|
Hi @andre-caldas , it makes sense to rename to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
There already is a Line 26 in 3b61f80 It is mentioned only in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Can we merge the use of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I don't believe they can be merged. While Since the current After you guys have decided on the best action (or non-action), I can happily implement it. :-) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Almost all names in the gismo namespace are named
gsSomething. Except forPoint. I don't actually know if this is a good thing or not, but that would allow me to bring the gismo namespace to the global namespace.Unless I already have a
Pointclass in my global namespace. I know it is not an important issue... if it is an issue at all. But it would be good if I could get noPointand maybe agsPoint, instead. Then I would be able to eliminate allgismo::in my.cppfiles.At least, maybe
gsConfig.hcould have a (deprecated)using Point = gsPointif the user really wants it to be namedPoint. Of course, ideally, I suppose this should not be in the installed library at all.Bad idea? :-)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions