Hi, I am new here, I have not yet installed DGGRID, but maybe I don't need to install it, if there are some more information...
I am looking for a statistical study on the error in the area equivalence. I am interested in comparing the ISEA and FULLER projections. Particularly interested in the quadrilateral grid, in hierarchical levels where the sides of the cell vary from 5m to 1km,
- ISEA4D - ISEA projection with diamond cells and an aperture of 4
- FULLER4D - FULLER projection with diamond cells and an aperture of 4
PS: context is the Brazilian "statistical grid" of the Census (population density distribution), which uses Albers projection for the Brazilian territory. We are looking for a geocode system that is based on an equal-area grid (that complies with the DGGS OGC standard), but is no worse than the Albers.
Hi, I am new here, I have not yet installed DGGRID, but maybe I don't need to install it, if there are some more information...
I am looking for a statistical study on the error in the area equivalence. I am interested in comparing the ISEA and FULLER projections. Particularly interested in the quadrilateral grid, in hierarchical levels where the sides of the cell vary from 5m to 1km,
PS: context is the Brazilian "statistical grid" of the Census (population density distribution), which uses Albers projection for the Brazilian territory. We are looking for a geocode system that is based on an equal-area grid (that complies with the DGGS OGC standard), but is no worse than the Albers.