Thanks for all your work on openclimbing. Really cool to see it develop and being able to use it more and more. :-)
I've added a few routes to peaks in Saxony. It's mostly trad climbing. There are usually peaks with a name and multiple routes that go onto the peak. For my edits I created a relation in OSM that contains all the routes and the peak. The relation is tagged with climbing=crag and has the same name as the peak. To me it makes sense to have the name on both the relation and the peak node, because we' d want to show the peak with its name in 'normal' map apps.
However openclimbing now shows both the peak and the relation in its interface, which I think is not intended.
See the Herkuleswand for example: Peak Node and Crag Relation both show up on the map and in the search bar.
What's the best way to solve this?
Thanks for all your work on openclimbing. Really cool to see it develop and being able to use it more and more. :-)
I've added a few routes to peaks in Saxony. It's mostly trad climbing. There are usually peaks with a name and multiple routes that go onto the peak. For my edits I created a relation in OSM that contains all the routes and the peak. The relation is tagged with
climbing=cragand has the same name as the peak. To me it makes sense to have the name on both the relation and the peak node, because we' d want to show the peak with its name in 'normal' map apps.However openclimbing now shows both the peak and the relation in its interface, which I think is not intended.
See the Herkuleswand for example: Peak Node and Crag Relation both show up on the map and in the search bar.
What's the best way to solve this?