Review: 21327 Typewriter
Posted by Huw,Steve Guinness' typewriter is one of three LEGO Ideas projects from the third review period of 2019 that achieved success and the first to be made into a set.
Steve is one half of the winning team in the 2017 UK LEGO Masters TV show and the original idea for the typing machine came from a model he built during the final. Subsequent to that, he refined it, submitted it to LEGO Ideas early in 2018, and it gathered the requisite 10,000 votes by October 2019.
It was therefore something of a 'slow burner': an idea that appealed to a certain demographic, but perhaps not everyone, especially those who have never used or even seen a real mechanical typewriter.
The original Idea
20th century mechanical typewriters all look very similar and the finished product certainly looks superficially like Steve's submission, but with several significant differences in the way it works to make it behave more like a real machine, as you will discover in this review.
Box and contents
The box follows the now-familiar convention for 18+ sets of showing the model on a black background, with the set's particulars tucked away discreetly at the bottom. The fact this is an Ideas set has been downplayed, with just a small logo in the corner indicating as much. I suppose the average consumer does not care what product range the set belongs to, or its provenance.
Parts are packaged in numbered bags which I've divided here to correspond with the three main stages of construction.
There's also a sticker sheet, which is so small that you may not realise it's lurking at the bottom of the cardboard envelope housing the instructions and therefore might throw it away with the envelope, as I did! Luckily it didn't get any further than my waste bin.
In addition to the 258-page instruction manual there's an additional book which contains perforated A5 sheets of paper printed with a letter from Thomas Kirk Kristiansen in 43 languages, the appropriate one of which can be fed into the typewriter.
Here's the US English version of the letter:
Construction
Part 1
Construction begins with the keyboard, and it's the most arduous part of the build. 32 'arms' for the individual keys are built first, nine each of three different designs, then five others. They are made entirely from Technic pieces and all include a 2l rubber damper that will be used to soften the movement of the keys.
The next stage involves threading the arms and other Technic pieces onto four 32l axles. It's intricate work, and mistakes are easily made. I noticed an error in my build shortly after taking this photo so had to unthread it all and start again. So, it pays not to rush to ensure you get it right first time.
When complete, the arms are locked in position in the frame.
The key tops are printed on 2x2 and 3x3 round tiles. The typeface was specifically designed for the model, and it includes features such as a symmetrical 'S' so it doesn't matter which way up you put it.
They are attached to two 2x2 round plates to give the keys some depth, then fixed to the arms using friction pins. This means they rotate fairly easily, and it's a bit of a nuisance getting them all lined up straight.
When the parts in bags 1-4 have been exhausted, the front section of the machine is complete.
Part 2
The machine's chassis and the mechanisms inside are added during this stage of the build. First, a hinged Technic assembly is positioned directly behind the keyboard, which rests on the ends of the key arms.
When any of the main 27 keys are pressed, the assembly is pushed backwards.
Next, a single type hammer -- the arm that strikes the paper in a real machine -- is attached to this assembly. Pressing a key now moves the arm towards the back of the model. Real typewriters have one for every key, of course, but that would have been impossible in a LEGO model of this size. Nevertheless, it's an improvement on Steve's original design which required a lever to be turned to operate the hammers.
In real typewriters, when a key is pressed and a letter printed on the paper, the paper needs to be moved to the left to allow the next letter to be printed to the right of it. This movement has been replicated in the model using springs and a very ingenious escapement mechanism. Again, this is something that wasn't present in the original Ideas submission.
The mechanism is positioned to the right of the chassis (when looking from the back). It's connected via a liftarm to the long sliding section at the back upon which the carriage will be mounted later. Four springs of the type first used for the front forks of 42107 Ducati Panigale attempt to push it to the right, but the escapement mechanism prevents it from moving.
When a key is pressed, the red Technic bush seen in the picture below is moved upwards, which allows the silver piece (usually used as a fan) to rotate, which in turn allows the carriage to move to the right 5mm or so due to the force supplied by the springs.
When the carriage reaches the extent of its travel, it needs to be manually pushed to the other end, as is the case in a real machine.
It's very clever and works extremely well.
The second stage of the build completes the chassis and upper bodywork of the machine. Note the two long curved pieces in the centre: white versions were first used in the rear bodywork of 10295 Porsche 911.
Unfortunately, those hoping for a new supply of sand green 1x8 bricks to make BrickLinking a 10185 Green Grocer a bit cheaper will be disappointed to learn that there are none in this set.
Part 3
The upper part of the carriage consists of the cylindrical platen, and paper fingers to keep the sheet in place around it. Unlike in the original Ideas submission, this one rotates and a sheet of A5-sized paper can be fed through it.
A sticker at the back states 'System in play', 'SG/NGUOYD:030774 Billund'. SG is a reference to Steve Guinness, and NGUOYD was revealed to be an acronym for 'Never give up on your dreams' by the designers during the recent fan media days.
A paper table, to hold the sheet upright at the back, is added before mounting the assembly onto the sprung-loaded section of the mechanism at the rear of the machine.
Finally, dummy ribbon spools are added, along with 12 dummy type hammers, ribbon and paper guides, and a handle on the left of the carriage -- the carriage return lever -- used to push it back to the right once a line of type has been completed. On a real machine that would also cause the cylinder, and thus the paper, to rotate slightly to enable typing on the next line, but that does not happen here.
The ribbon is the only new 'element' in the set.
The completed model
The machine measures about 26cm square, the size of a 32x32 baseplate and, thanks in part to it being virtually studless, looks very realistic indeed. I think it's slightly smaller than a real machine, but not by much, and it's missing a row of number keys. The carriage is definitely not as wide given that it only accommodates A5 paper (about 150mm wide) rather than Foolscap (8 inches/200mm) but overall it's perfectly proportioned.
The 27 letter and punctuation keys have a very nice feel to them, thanks to the rubber dampers. Pressing on any of them moves the single type hammer towards the carriage and the carriage slightly to the left. It doesn't move as far as it would on a real machine, though, only about 15 characters. Nevertheless, it's very satisfying to watch.
Pressing the shift, backspace or space keys does nothing.
The small lever on the top right of the machine does nothing either, but replicates the one on a real machine that would switch between red and black type.
The carriage return lever is not very robust and needs to be pushed from the bottom to avoid it detaching.
I think it looks great from every angle. Some will complain about the brown axle ends and tan Technic pins, but I suspect real machines have similar-looking screws and other parts on the sides.
A sheet of A5 paper, one of the letters in the book if you like, can be fed around the platen using the barrel on the end to rotate it, and when in place the machine looks for all the world like a real one.
Verdict
It's an incredibly realistic model of a typewriter that packs in a lot of functionality. It's also the perfect blend of System and Technic: a complex Technic mechanism inside an elegant System-built bodywork, and approach that should perhaps be applied elsewhere.
It maintains the characteristics of the original Ideas submission but improves on them manifold: the exterior is more refined and colourful, and the internal mechanism is vastly improved. I think Steve must be very happy with the result and I will be asking him if that's the case during our exclusive interview with him that I will be publishing tomorrow.
I acknowledge that it's not a model that everyone will appreciate: those looking for playability will be disappointed, and it won't mean much to those that have never seen a real typewriter. However, those who are after an outstanding display model that's good enough to fool people into thinking it's the real thing will find much to like here.
Parallels can perhaps be drawn between this and 21323 Grand Piano. Many people expected the piano to do more than it did, so were disappointed with its limited functionality. I don't think that will be the case here. If anything, the model does more than one might reasonably expect a LEGO replica of a typewriter to do.
In fact, I'm finding it hard to find fault with it. My only complaint really is that the keys have a tendency to rotate out of alignment over time, but that's easily remedied, and once the novelty of pressing them has worn off it won't be such a problem.
The 2,079-piece set will be available to LEGO VIPs at LEGO.com tomorrow, priced at €199.99 / $199.99 / £179.99 / $329.99 AUD / $269.99 CAD.
I am sorry that I've not been able to take any 'lifestyle' photos of it sitting on an attractive wood table. Following redecoration of 'Brickset Towers' last week, I'm currently working on a temporary plywood table awaiting delivery of new office furniture later this week. It will take pride of place on my desk when it arrives.
Thanks to LEGO for providing the set for review. All opinions expressed are my own.
198 likes
88 comments on this article
This is a fantastic model, with many more mechanical features than one would expect. The escapement for the carriage is particularly clever. Thanks for the review!
Shame Brickset Towers is not ready for lifestyle photos yet. I was rather looking forwards to seeing you typing away at your desk, bowtie correctly in position and pipe in mouth.
Great review, thank you. This is artwork at its best.
Does your build have any issues where the carriage mechanism will get stuck and refuse to move on further keypresses? We found in our copy that it got stuck at times, though I suspect that's more likely due to build error than the set itself...
@hawkeye7269 said:
"Does your build have any issues where the carriage mechanism will get stuck and refuse to move on further keypresses? We found in our copy that it got stuck at times, though I suspect that's more likely due to build error than the set itself... "
perhaps you have to pull the ribbon through a little and add some DW40 to the mechanism...these old typewriters are liable to becoming a bit stiff with age ;-)
Easily one of the most annoying reviews I've read, because I had no interest in this set before and now I really want to build it! The amount of functionality they included is very impressive, especially since most of it wasn't in the original submission! And I'm definitely looking forward to acquiring some of those letter prints on B&P
My first impression of this set was that it was a nice, original idea and I appreciated how it was a bit different from anything that had gone before. I was chuffed to see it get approval but never had it down as anything other than 'maybe one day I'll get it' purchase. After reading the review and seeing just how clever the mechanisms are inside (especially to someone like myself who has limited Technic knowledge), I desperately want this set. It's so clever as well as being beautiful and unlike anything else I've seen in an official set.
If only I'd not just had to pay silly money to get my car fixed *sigh*
Life-like with functionality, complex, beautiful and non-licensed. Nice work, LEGO.
A fine review of a very impressive set. The styling and functionality are both very well done, the build looks challenging without being tedious, and the price is right, by which I mean it isn't too big. This model really pushes the limits of what can be done with Lego parts. Maybe if the system keeps developing, in another twenty years they'll make a typewriter mk II that replicates all the functionality of the real thing but the ink.
I find it interesting how everyone seems to be awfully impressed by this model (that doesn't type), but were hung up on the piano, (that didn't play).
I think this is a great model and will be an incredible build. I just happen to find old typewriters very unaesthetic to the eye. They are quite ugly and always have been. Whereas a grand piano, is something I find to be a beautiful piece of craftsmanship and therefore, its model far more aesthetically appealing.
I like this model, and will probably get it for the building experience (which I think is clever), but I don't get the hype over such a basic unappealing functional old machine that was mass produced. Sorry.
Older model typewriters have always seemed a wonderful mechanical object to me. I've been looking forward to this model and it appears to have exceed my expectations. We'll find out soon! Thanks for the great, detailed review. Even without the Brickset Towers photos. Perhaps later?
@Montyh7 said:
"I find it interesting how everyone seems to be awfully impressed by this model (that doesn't type), but were hung up on the piano, (that didn't play).
I think this is a great model and will be an incredible build. I just happen to find old typewriters very unaesthetic to the eye. They are quite ugly and always have been. Whereas a grand piano, is something I find to be a beautiful piece of craftsmanship and therefore, its model far more aesthetically appealing.
I like this model, and will probably get it for the building experience (which I think is clever), but I don't get the hype over such a basic unappealing functional old machine that was mass produced. Sorry. "
Valid, I'd say one of the differences is that this build is practically 1:1 whereas the piano was much much smaller. Also a lot of people had this idea where a plastic-brick piano would have strings and hammers and you'd be able to play a Lego waltz. I did not expect the piano to play, so I wasn't disappointed with it, but I also feel like the mechanics that they captured were much simpler and less numerous than in this set. Different (key) strokes for different folks
When I look at this I can SMELL the old typewriter we had in the house when I was a kid. A smell like metal, oil, ink and dust.
I was a definite 'no' before, but now that I see the Technics inside I'm a 'maybe'. I was a bit disappointed that there is only one striker. I couldn't expect all of them, but maybe 5 would have been cool. I was gonna let that go and was leaning 'yes', but then this:
"On a real machine that would also cause the cylinder, and thus the paper, to rotate slightly to enable typing on the next line, but that does not happen here."
Now I'm a maybe. It would be a fun challenge to mod this thing to do what I want it to, but as a busy adult I'm not sure I'm ready for the time commitment there. But THANK YOU for the review!!!
Like the piano never had one, have typed on one of these when very young but it may of been an electric sort. This looks so good great colour to.
I still need this though! then piano it not built yet, soon a guitar is on way to is rumour!
What a very sad, sad, single armed typewriter. Do it right or don't do it.
I like it, but no top row of 1-9 and zero keys and no punctuation keys and no bell. Not sure I'll buy it.
Great review as always! Thanks! I am pretty impressed by the set
I’ve got to say, it looks beautiful
@Montyh7 said:
"I find it interesting how everyone seems to be awfully impressed by this model (that doesn't type), but were hung up on the piano, (that didn't play).
I think this is a great model and will be an incredible build. I just happen to find old typewriters very unaesthetic to the eye. They are quite ugly and always have been. Whereas a grand piano, is something I find to be a beautiful piece of craftsmanship and therefore, its model far more aesthetically appealing.
I like this model, and will probably get it for the building experience (which I think is clever), but I don't get the hype over such a basic unappealing functional old machine that was mass produced. Sorry. "
The thing about aesthetics is that they're relative. My daughter loves antiques and typewriters, and she's impressed with this model. Not for you, but might be for somebody.
I'd like to see a video of it in action.
My mother used to be a typing instructor/teacher so I may buy one for her. I love the technic mechanism with the escapement etc.
I'm kind of torn with models like these. They're beautiful to look at, and Lego needs to be broader than an endless stream of mining-scale models. But while the functionality is impressive I can get a typewriter that actually types, brand new, for less money than this. It's the same problem I had with the Lego NES. The attention to detail was astounding and it was a technical marvel, but I could get an NES that actually played games for less than a quarter of the price.
Maybe it's unfair to compare these models with the real-life inspiration (as they serve very different purposes) but when you take into account the high prices, I personally find it impossible to justify the purchase.
Is it just me or does the image under part 3 look like a lightsaber ?
@MainBricker said:
"Very strange that people seem to like this set, yet are offended by the Adidas Superstar. Both are full-sized Lego representations of real-world items."
I think it's the combination of close release dates ("Ugh, another one of those?), the "nostalgic feel of old device vs cross-promo with a company making overpriced shoes" and general quality of this vs the shoe (it really doesn't look like what it's supposed to be).
I can't help thinking that if you want an old-looking typewriter to display, then get an old typewriter...
Absolutely beautiful model and I wish I A. had a personal connection to typewriters and B. a place to put it because it looks like an incredibly fun build. One thing I was surprised about was the open bottom beneath the keys. I was assuming a finished, plate-built bottom but ultimately it's not really a portable model so conserving the piece count for functions and more prominent details makes sense.
@MainBricker said:
"Very strange that people seem to like this set, yet are offended by the Adidas Superstar. Both are full-sized Lego representations of real-world items."
Agreed...I'm not a fan of either set. The typewriter brings back bad memories of my high school typing class. I do like the sand green color of the typewriter though.
As someone who grew up in a newspaper family, this is a must-have. My late Grandpapa would have loved this.
I'm glad Lego was able to work additional functionality into the model from what was submitted. The moving carriage and hammer elevate this from good to great. I'm also glad that all of the keys are printed. Normally I'm very pro-sticker, but lining up round stickers on round parts can be a challenge and would be especially so with 32 of them!
@CDM , I have a feeling that the base is open below the keys on real machines.
Thanks everyone for your comments about the review and I'm glad that it's persuaded some of you that weren't considering buying it to do so.
@Huw said:
" @CDM , I have a feeling that the base is open below the keys on real machines.
Thanks everyone for your comments about the review and I'm glad that it's persuaded some of you that weren't considering buying it to do so."
After looking at some pics you're exactly right.
As always, thanks for such a great review.
@Edemontes said:
"Shame Brickset Towers is not ready for lifestyle photos yet. I was rather looking forwards to seeing you typing away at your desk, bowtie correctly in position and pipe in mouth."
Sorry to disappoint you!
As many as 4 French versions of the letter? I wonder what justifies this, given the French language is essentially the same and the letter does not use any regionally-different words… The date format perhaps?
I also wonder what could be different between the Dutch-Dutch and Belgian-Dutch versions :D
I wonder what the difference is between Kristiansen’s letter in Dutch and the letter in “Flemish”. Flemish is not a language; we speak Dutch in the north of Belgium. Both letters should be identical.
If it only had a special feature that if you pressed many keys at once, the hammers would jam up :)
It was a great review, and the build looks great. Sadly, it's one of these "I have nothing to do with it the moment it's done" sets, so I'll skip it.
As a side note, I'll add that it could be nice to have a short video or animated gif (if you can't/won't host videos) of the moving mechanics, as we can't get it 100% just from reading and looking at the picture.
From the photo did the original design have 4 moving hammers rather than 1? Although the inclusion of the other features like the shifting letter is more interesting, with the escape mechanism worth taking a closer look at as may have potential in clocks etc.
It looks lovely. I've had a hankering for an old typewriter for some time, but I know deep down that any time I need to write I'll reach for the laptop.
This sounds like a perfect melding of my desire for a typewriter and my love of the brick.
Just one minor observation, Huw. You say...
"The fact this is an Ideas set has been downplayed, with just a small logo in the corner indicating as much."
It also has 'Lego Ideas 035 ' on the main 'Typewriter' logo.
I learned to type on a manual typewriter and took one with me when I went to college...a necessity then, making this set very nostalgic for me.
BUT.... I had just finished showing my wife the photo of the set and stated that we weren't going to be purchasing. Then I read your review. The really amazing part of the set is the interior workings, which your review clearly explains.
I'm sold! Thank you!
@Mister_Jonny said:
"I'm kind of torn with models like these. They're beautiful to look at, and Lego needs to be broader than an endless stream of mining-scale models. But while the functionality is impressive I can get a typewriter that actually types, brand new, for less money than this. It's the same problem I had with the Lego NES. The attention to detail was astounding and it was a technical marvel, but I could get an NES that actually played games for less than a quarter of the price.
Maybe it's unfair to compare these models with the real-life inspiration (as they serve very different purposes) but when you take into account the high prices, I personally find it impossible to justify the purchase."
Can you rebuild a real typewriter into a real NES?
When you get a Lego version of a real item, you lose some of the functionality of the real item. But that's not what Lego has ever been about. It's about the Lego. Not only do you get to actually build your NES or typewriter (which would definitely not be the case for the real version), but you also get the ability to rebuild it into other things. When you get a Lego typewriter, the pieces aren't glued together into one huge barely-functioning lump of plastic. It's totally possible to get this set and not build it at all, and just use the pieces for other Mocs. I could get it and rebuild it into an NES or at least a Gameboy. That's the point. Not having a thing that looks like a typewriter on your shelf. If that was your *only* goal, then sure, get a legit one. But that's all you'll have.
I always say I speek Flemish instead of Dutch. I know it officially is the same but there are differences just like colour and color or holiday and vacation.
But I wonder how you would type the Ukranian or Russian letter with this Latin alphabet, let alone the Chinese one because the Chinese use more than 40.000 characters.
Well done Lego. So many people here who have gone from total dismissal to "well actually, it's very clever and looks good, so perhaps..." I've got at least three real typewriters in deep storage, untouched for years, and I'm tempted too. I may be getting my first set costing over £120. Yeah, well done, Lego.
This set looks like so much fun to build. I want to build it.
I'm still terribly disappointed that they left off the final column of keys that would have been required to remap it to the Dvorak layout that I've used for the last 25 years. This is a remarkable model, but I don't want to spend $200 on a display piece that prominently shows off a keyboard arrangement I have no desire to look at.
It's also weird they printed the Kristiansen letter in a proportional-width font which is only vaguely evocative of actual typewriter text. It definitely doesn't look quite right in the typewriter.
OK, I like the technical portion of the build, but IMO it really isn't worth the money...
Not when i can buy the A-wing, or something of equal value. But each their own I guess.
I was a pass when this was approved by LEGO Ideas and when it was first announced, but then I read… “It's also the perfect blend of System and Technic: a complex Technic mechanism inside an elegant System-built bodywork.” Sets that combine system and technic tend to be my favorite builds so I might end up getting this for the build even if I think the subject matter itself is a little boring.
I was rather hoping for an older version rather than 1950s, so what was going to be a yes has turned into a no, although it is better than I anticipated after the piano.
I think that the disappointment with the piano was to do with size and functionality. I know it would be unrealistic of lego to have a scale piano, but all the pictures seem to show off how small it was. The typewriter is comparable to the real thing and it has a lot of functionality which does not require an app. I was forced to recently replace my phone because the apps I use were updated in such a way that neglected to account for not everyone having up to date tech and given from what I hear of those who do download lego apps, not everyone can get them to work. So to have something which does not require extras and still does a lot is surprising. It also shows lego have listened to their customers, not to mention this is after the piano, so the expectations have altered due to that.
The pic with all the liftarms in bag 1: is that a new 2L Technic liftarm? Either double or single in red.
@merman said:
"The pic with all the liftarms in bag 1: is that a new 2L Technic liftarm? Either double or single in red. "
No, it's the new https://brickset.com/parts/design-72008 piece.
When you reference the Ducati Panigale, you say the escapement prevents the carriage from moving to the right, but that should be to the left, correct? On the serial/model number “plate”, the number 030774 is reportedly Steve’s birthdate, though I don’t know if that follows the MMDDYY or DDMMYY convention. The “missing” number keys apparently would have been incorporated into the letter keys (along with lowercase letters), but a choice was made to omit any extra characters so the tiles could be used as letter tiles (apparently they weren’t really thinking of the logistics involved in acquiring enough tiles to spell even a few words). Any rivets or screws that were visible from the sides would have probably been powder-coated to match the body of the typewriter, so complaints about the reddish-brown and tan connectors is still valid, especially since this is exactly the sort of situation that would allow them to request an exemption. Whether they were denied that request, or never made it because they needed too many other recolors for the rest of the design, we might never know.
It took me a little while to figure out how they alphabetized all the different languages. American English, as often is the case, is at the top of the list. Being the biggest market in general, the biggest market by language...and also the fact that some of us will be expecting it to be filed under “American”, this makes sense. Everything else seems to be grouped according to main language, then local dialects, as written in English (hence why Swiss French comes before DE). The only one I can’t figure out is why Brazilian Portuguese comes before Portuguese, since basic French comes before any of the local dialects.
@hawkeye7269:
If there’s any sloppy construction in your model, it can prevent mechanical features from working. The more complex the mechanism, the more careful you need to be with assembly. This means pressing any brick/plate/tile connections firmly together so there are no uneven surfaces that things can catch on. Moving Technic parts, on the other hand, need to move freely. This means the parts can’t be pressed together so tight that they pinch. The model also needs to be resting on a flat, smooth surface so it doesn’t warp out of shape.
@CDM:
@Huw:
I’ve never owned a typewriter myself, but relatives of mine did. I believe stationary manual typewriters would have had open frames so things that got dropped on the keyboard would fall out the bottom where they wouldn’t jam up the keys. Portable models (either manual or electric) probably had enclosed bases to keep stuff from getting inside when they were packed up for travel. I have no idea about stationary electric typewriters.
@essel:
@Jupiter:
The company I work for offers Spanish and Puerto Rican Spanish language options on the HR website. My supervisor at the time was Hispanic (raised in the US, probably of Mexican ancestry, and studying Spanish as a secondary language at the time), while a coworker had transferred from a Puerto Rican facility. I never found out how they were different, but both agreed that it made sense for them to offer a Puerto Rican dialect option. Canadian French in Quebec is also apparently very distinct from what’s spoken in France. Mostly it probably comes down to phrasing. Words and spelling may be identical, but it’s usually possible to tell the difference between a British production and British characters in an American production based on how heavily they lean into British slang.
@asherkobin:
That’s how I know my dad probably had a typewriter. I’m pretty sure he had to bend the arms back into shape a few times.
@fakespacesquid:
I’m reminded of an episode of ST:TNG where the O’Brien family is sitting down for a meal, and Miles compliments Keiko, who says something like, “Thanks, I punched it in myself!” If you buy a vintage typewriter, all you can say is that you paid for it. For this, you still can’t say you designed it, but the simple fact that you assembled it from instructions is certainly enough to impress a lot of the people who come to see my LUG’s layouts. And yeah, when you grow tired of it, this is probably one of the top five sand-green packs. A lot of people will be looking at this with nothing else in mind besides parting the set out into their collection. Not a lot of people will eagerly buy a real typewriter because it has useful parts.
@Xiaolong:
Yeah, Cyrillic is a problem (and Spanish is missing “ñ”, and other languages are missing stuff like umlauts), but Chinese can be written in Romaji, where you just use the Latin alphabet to spell out the sounds of Chinese characters. It was a necessary concession because even the best Chinese typists can only manage a few words per minute otherwise.
Luckily (maybe not the right word) I’m old enough to remember these in use by the older generation whilst I was learning IT, to me it looks great and reminiscent of those early days.
Also, for those wanting to watch a film with one in... All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy :)
I love this thing. It speaks to the writer in me in ways that I’m guessing the piano might have done to a musician.
@PurpleDave, the escapement prevents the carriage from moving to the right when viewed from the back, as in the photo, which is of course to the left when viewing from the front!
I think sets like the Typewriter and the Piano are great education sets to help understand and appreciate how these devices work.
While obviously a real Typewriter and a real Piano is more authentic, those are much harder to pull apart and learn about how they work, and most people wouldn't feel comfortable putting it back together without breaking anything.
What is the colour of that tile with "System" printed on? It is darker than all of sand green of a typewriter but different shade than regular green.
edit:
Nevermind - it looks like a sticker that is simply too dark to match brick's colour
Do your keys ever get stuck, ?
Once your redecorating is done I think we’d all appreciate some lifestyle photos. Personally I want to see how this looks alongside the Duplo Earth.
@Huw:
Either you tweaked the article, or I just brushed past that bit. From the photos, it does kinda look like it could be facing forwards with the keyboard removed. Anyways, we’re so used to seeing the cursor move to the right on a screen that it’s easy to forget typewriters kept the “cursor” stationary and shifted the whole page to the left and up as you type.
@Agent00Z:
A grand piano has a rigid steel or cast iron frame that weighs a few hundred pounds, and with strings attached under high tension. After taking it apart, I doubt most people would feel comfortable in general...unless the nurse dialed up the morphine a bit more than usual.
@Mestari:
The keys are all printed. The System logo on the front, and the serial/model number plate on the back, are stickers to mimic the metal plates that would normally be affixed in those positions. I’ve seen one mention that they’re “chromed”, which of course is impossible, but they might be printed on a foil backing?
So Lego can make a typewriter into an Ideas set, but not Avatar: The Last Airbender or The Legend of Zelda? :/
@Slithus_Venom:
They’ve already produced an Avatar theme, and thus far have not green-lit any Ideas projects based on legacy licenses with the notable exception of NASA. Space, Castle, and Pirates, sure, but those were all original IP.
For Zelda, the most appealing project was a Wind-Waker boat, which got rejected because it would have required new molds at a time when that was strictly off-limits. They also didn’t have any Nintendo licenses at that time. Now they have Mario, so the foot is in the door...but Mario was specifically designed as a playable electronic game. I don’t see Zelda translating to that system very well, given how many ranged attacks exist in those games. Molds are no longer an issue, but the last few 10k projects just didn’t look like something anyone but a Zelda super fan would recognize...or buy. The best outcome I can see is if the Wind-Waker boat was resubmitted in light of the changes that have happened since it was rejected (which even includes a new elf-eared hat that’s perfect for Link). I’ve barely played any Zelda games, but I’d buy that boat for sure.
Why does the review say 27 letter and punctuation keys when there are 28?
Im not really into this set, but I am impressed with it and especially the way the color works so well for it.
Excellent set, which I'll definite get at some point. I got the Grand Piano when it was reduced by £60 on Amazon. Hoping for a similar percentage reduction on this within a couple of months.
Next up, a fully functional comptometer to keep it company please!
Cool set, great review :) I'll definitely be getting this
Great review. This set is a definite must have for me.
As for
"There's also a sticker sheet, which is so small that you may not realise it's lurking at the bottom of the cardboard envelope housing the instructions and therefore might throw it away with the envelope, as I did! Luckily it didn't get any further than my waste bin."
That made me smile, because imho that's exactly where every sticker sheet belongs anyway.
:-)
@essel said:
"As many as 4 French versions of the letter? I wonder what justifies this, given the French language is essentially the same and the letter does not use any regionally-different words… The date format perhaps?
I also wonder what could be different between the Dutch-Dutch and Belgian-Dutch versions :D"
Didn't even notice that before my daughter asked me about the differences when I showed her all the language options.
Strange also why they only have German once, when there are distinct differences for example between German, Austrian and Swiss versions of German. But hey, perhaps we need four different versions of French even more, after all what do I know?
@fakespacesquid This... doesn't really make a lot of sense as an argument. It highlights the merits of Lego itself, but it doesn't argue for the existence of a specific model.
Most (or at least many) people who buy Lego do so because a specific combination of parts appeals to them, rather than the individual parts themselves. Being able to assemble AND disassemble a model is certainly Lego's best feature—I modify my models all the time—but we still discriminate in our buying choices; that's why this review exists in the first place. A set needs to succeeds on its own merits (which apparently it does for most readers of this review). Arguing you can take it apart or remodel it doesn't change that.
If your key selling point of this typewriter is that it doesn't HAVE to be a typewriter—that we can rebuild it into something else—why make a typewriter (or indeed, any specific model) at all? Why not just sell generic boxes of bricks (or individual pieces) and be done with it? Why even review sets if their primary selling point is the parts rather than the whole?
You can't overlook the price of these models, either. The Lego NES costs around £200—for a model that is aesthetically splendid, but functionally limited. I'm thoroughly impressed at how they've managed to recreate the action of Super Mario Bros. in Lego form. But I didn't buy it because I suspected the novelty would wear off fairly quickly, and because I was able to get an NES Mini—something that mimics both the form AND function of the original—for a lot less money.
There's certainly a place for this kind of thing (if its early reception is any indication) but I don't think the ability to make non-typewriter models from the pieces is the best argument for its existence.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion - free speech - just don't argue if your opinion is not to others tastes... that said
Wow - kudos to the designer. This in my opinion is what a lego idea set should be - something from the normal, not a variance on a theme
Brilliant review and at some stage a purchase for me
thumbs up
@Mister_Jonny:
While sets bought as sets are certainly where most of the sales will come from, sets absolutely get bought as parts packs. Any set that includes a decent range of parts in a rare color will always attract attention from anyone who ever has, or ever expects to, build in that color.
I don't understand the point of these models that are more expensive than the real thing. Not only the Adidas and this typewriter, the piano is silly expensive when you can get for a bit more a very good electronic keyboard with weighted and pressure sensitive keys.
@pecadorl said:
"I don't understand the point of these models that are more expensive than the real thing. Not only the Adidas and this typewriter, the piano is silly expensive when you can get for a bit more a very good electronic keyboard with weighted and pressure sensitive keys."
Why do you get Star Wars sets when you could easily get more accurate action figures and models?
@fakespacesquid said:
" @pecadorl said:
"I don't understand the point of these models that are more expensive than the real thing. Not only the Adidas and this typewriter, the piano is silly expensive when you can get for a bit more a very good electronic keyboard with weighted and pressure sensitive keys."
Why do you get Star Wars sets when you could easily get more accurate action figures and models?"
Or why buy Technic Supercars / remote controlled vehicles or Creator Expert cars when you can get scale models or RC vehicles with far better functionality at the same or better price?
@austinpowers, @pecadorl
Y'all know this is a LEGO website, yeah?
Just checking, because sometimes people forget.
@bananaworld said:
"
@austinpowers, @pecadorl
Y'all know this is a LEGO website, yeah?
Just checking, because sometimes people forget."
I believe me and Austinpowers are on the same page here, the stars have aligned
The point of the Lego version is that it's Lego. I don't want a real typewriter, but I'd definitely get this one. If someone wanted an actual typewriter, then they could always get one. I can't imagine a group of people who just want something that kinda looks like a typewriter, but if that group exists then sure, they could just get a real one. But that's more of a strawman than an actual criticism of the set. The same logic of "If you want something that looks like X then why not just get a real one" could be applied to about 99.9% of Lego sets, which is why it's bad logic here.
@fakespacesquid said:
" @bananaworld said:
"
@austinpowers, @pecadorl
Y'all know this is a LEGO website, yeah?
Just checking, because sometimes people forget."
I believe me and Austinpowers are on the same page here, the stars have aligned
The point of the Lego version is that it's Lego. I don't want a real typewriter, but I'd definitely get this one. If someone wanted an actual typewriter, then they could always get one. I can't imagine a group of people who just want something that kinda looks like a typewriter, but if that group exists then sure, they could just get a real one. But that's more of a strawman than an actual criticism of the set. The same logic of "If you want something that looks like X then why not just get a real one" could be applied to about 99.9% of Lego sets, which is why it's bad logic here. "
This argument comes up every time Lego releases something vaguely real-life-esque. I want the Lego one because it's Lego! Case closed
@bananaworld said:
"
@austinpowers , @pecadorl
Y'all know this is a LEGO website, yeah?
Just checking, because sometimes people forget."
Of course I do. We are on the same side.
I was simply seconding the notion of @fakespacesquid versus @pecadorl 's remark that he doesn't understand the point of sets like the typewriter (or Adidas shoe, piano, NES etc.)
For anyone trying to argue that these kind of sets are expensive, it'll likely cost you even more to gather together the individual pieces in brand new part orders off LEGO Bricks & Pieces and/or Bricklink/Brickowl if you wanted to build something similar.
Sets might build a specific thing, however every set LEGO produces is really just a targeted parts pack (and remember you're also getting a nice instruction booklet and organized packaging of those parts which adds to the cost, so it's more than just the price of the bricks).
@MainBricker said:
" @sipuss said:
" @MainBricker said:
"Very strange that people seem to like this set, yet are offended by the Adidas Superstar. Both are full-sized Lego representations of real-world items."
I think it's the combination of close release dates ("Ugh, another one of those?), the "nostalgic feel of old device vs cross-promo with a company making overpriced shoes" and general quality of this vs the shoe (it really doesn't look like what it's supposed to be)."
There is a certain amount of irony on a Lego site of people moaning about other objects being overpriced."
Exactly, all hobbies are expensive. Some people want to spend $200 on plastic blocks, others $200 on sneakers.
Also, the irony in saying the typewriter has a nostalgic feel and the Superstar doesn't, even though that shoe has been around for over 50 years and was kind of groundbreaking.
"Unfortunately, those hoping for a new supply of sand green 1x8 bricks to make BrickLinking a 10185 Green Grocer a bit cheaper will be disappointed to learn that there are none in this set."
Darn.
I think it's pretty ingenious how they figured out that the sand green 32L axles could be used both as flower stems and as structure for a typewriter — in sand green.
I've seen a few typewriters but the most recent one I saw was in the Pullman coach at the Orient Express exhibition that's currently ongoing in Singapore until September. I believe it's an actual Remington Portable typewriter and not a replica, though I understand there to be a mix of both real artifacts and replicas at the exhibition (the rolling stock themselves are, of course, the real things, shipped from France, though it's unclear if the specific coaches were part of any Orient Express services — this one served on the Côte d'Azur). It's even got an AZERTY layout, which does seem to make it quite a shame that you can't remap the keys on this model.
But for what it is, and what's there, I really like this. I love the personal touch of the letter by Thomas Kirk Kristiansen and the fact that the fan designer got to be involved with him on the production of this model. I almost want to get it. I can never have enough sand green in my LEGO room.
@AustinPowers said:
" @fakespacesquid said:
" @pecadorl said:
"I don't understand the point of these models that are more expensive than the real thing. Not only the Adidas and this typewriter, the piano is silly expensive when you can get for a bit more a very good electronic keyboard with weighted and pressure sensitive keys."
Why do you get Star Wars sets when you could easily get more accurate action figures and models?"
Or why buy Technic Supercars / remote controlled vehicles or Creator Expert cars when you can get scale models or RC vehicles with far better functionality at the same or better price? "
I have plenty of Star Wars sets but only one UCS (death star playset) because I like Lego as toys not as models. I want Lego to be close to the source material but still blocky and with studs. I don`'t like large smooth surfaces trying to hide that are made from Lego blocks.
Compared to RC models Technic has an extra educational value, you can learn a lot while building the mechanisms. I also have a lot of Technic sets but I didn't buy any of the last cars based on specific vehicles.
And any Technic or Star Wars set are much cheaper than the real (or imaginary) thing :-)
I for one like these new and different LEGO sets/designs. Yes, they can be very niche, but they do have appeal. Be it flowers, typewriters, or sneakers. We all have our interest/passions and to have them realized in LEGO...always a win!
I only wish they had used a traditional IDEAS-style box with the lifting lid. Could have been modified to be like a Typewriter Case...and possibly fit the finished item :)
Why was the U.S. English shown instead of the UK English? I thought this was a proud British site. :P
^ Don't worry, I checked for any spelling 'errors' on the US version. There were no z's instead of s's or missing u's that I could see :)
@Huw:
If they didn’t muck up the US version with Britishisms, what differences do exist between the two?
It just occurred to me: if the moving hammer does actually hit the silver tiles making up the guide, would long-term play start wearing out the silver drum lacquering? On my 41902 Sparkly Unicorn Bracelet, the same silver drum lacquering on the 1x1 quarter tiles is wearing out due to abrasion and exposure to the elements. Not that anyone's going to play that much with this model, but still, something to think about...
I ordered on release day and I'm looking forward to starting to build it soon.
I should be in the target market for the Grand Piano too (I'm a musician). I don't care that it doesn't play but I am annoyed they included the electronic junk and app. I would rather the price have been lower.