Random set of the day: Container Truck

Posted by ,
Container Truck

Container Truck

©2010 LEGO Group

Today's random set is 8052 Container Truck, released in 2010. It's one of 11 Technic sets produced that year. It contains 686 pieces, and its retail price was US$69.99/£49.99.

It's owned by 3175 Brickset members. If you want to add it to your collection you might find it for sale at BrickLink or eBay.

Help me come to life! If you like the set I've chosen for you today, please pledge your support for me on LEGO Ideas so I have a chance of becoming an official LEGO set!


20 comments on this article

Gravatar
By in United States,

Nice to have a PF truck without having to get something really big like the tow truck or 42009 .

Gravatar
By in Australia,

I'm not even a big Technic fan, but that is pretty.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I look at this and see nothing but broken parts if I were to own it. Every 3L blue pin, every half width beam, every axle forcing every bushing to crack. Technic is supposedly LEGO's strongest system, but it always finds a way to break on me, and I don't even do anything but put the set together exactly as instructed.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Power functions?

Gravatar
By in United States,

As long as I've been on brickset, I've never seen a "set of the day" set that I actually own. I do love the random set of the day though, it's pretty sweet! And you can discover new sets daily!

Gravatar
By in United States,

When technic was more about functions and moving parts and less custom panels and stickers...the only downer from me was the need for batteries.

Gravatar
By in United States,

13-wide? That’s a little big for minifigs...

@MCLegoboy:
I had some bad luck in the early 00’s, with white Technic saddle joints that would split on the axle end, but that appeared to be a batch issue. I’ve also blown up at least one 8-tooth gear, but there’s not much to them, and it’s easy to load them up with too much torque. And when I first started making my Bioniwars MOCs, I remember having huge problems with the backpack on Jango Fettoa, where pushing the old 1x1 cones into the ends of a 1x5 beam would split the ends right open...but they added a flange to the tip that solved that problem.

Gravatar
By in United States,

A fair set. It won't set the world on fire but it's a fine example of what it's trying to be.

I give it a grade of B.

Gravatar
By in Turkey,

This is not a bad set but not that interesting either. Power functions are always a plus.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Sadly, this set is symptomatic of what pushed me away from Technic. The sets I liked used bricks and pins and looked "solid" (if that makes sense), instead of being made out of lift-arms, panels and custom pieces of plastic like they are now.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

This is a nice set with some functions, it even has an interesting B-Model. It also had a hefty price tag, but it comes with power function, so... I guess it's okay.
It is missing the enginebay.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@MCLegoboy said:
"I look at this and see nothing but broken parts if I were to own it. Every 3L blue pin, every half width beam, every axle forcing every bushing to crack. Technic is supposedly LEGO's strongest system, but it always finds a way to break on me, and I don't even do anything but put the set together exactly as instructed."
Are you the Hulk by any chance?
Ever since coming out of my dark ages I have never had a single LEGO piece of any kind break anymore. Ever.
When I was a kid, parts that broke were quite common, especially those grey 1 by X Technic plates with rounded, toothed ends. Axle holders were also prone to cracking, as where the dark grey rail track sleepers (and the grey tracks themselves too).
Then again, mini me was quite a bit more impulsive and less careful than adult me, so not all the damage might have been due to brittle materials.

As for this set, pretty nice. Also, what a year 2010 was for Technic, especially compared to the pitiful state the theme is in nowadays. Back then we got 8043, imho the best Technic set ever.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@MCLegoboy said:
"I look at this and see nothing but broken parts if I were to own it. Every 3L blue pin, every half width beam, every axle forcing every bushing to crack. Technic is supposedly LEGO's strongest system, but it always finds a way to break on me, and I don't even do anything but put the set together exactly as instructed."

You’ve got to stop putting your sets together with a sledgehammer dude, we’ve talked about this XD

Gravatar
By in Japan,

A really like the actuator in this set as it makes it function very similar to the real thing which is what makes Technic special. Even if you didn't want the truck, this set had a good supply of beams etc. to experiment with your designs or combine with other sets to expand your creativity. The £50 price seemed especially good value when you consider Lego were selling only the battery and motor set 8293 for £35 for 11 years!

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I have this one. It's fits in a category that modern Technic no longer seems to accommodate (poor margins I guess) - the medium set with power functions and interesting functionality. The hook loading/tipping mechanism is really quite clever for the price point.

Gravatar
By in Poland,

@GrosPanda1979 said:
"Sadly, this set is symptomatic of what pushed me away from Technic. The sets I liked used bricks and pins and looked "solid" (if that makes sense), instead of being made out of lift-arms, panels and custom pieces of plastic like they are now."

Almost none of the old style technic set looked solid, most of them were less covered than they are now (thanks to those panels you seem to dislike). And this set is quite typical for a proper technic set- it has moving functions that you can see without disassembly but from a distance it looks "covered".

Gravatar
By in United States,

@AustinPowers:
A lot of older parts have either been discontinued or heavily updated due to having designs that made them prone to breaking, like the toothed Technic plates and half-bushings. For transparent parts, it was more about the material (acrylic vs polycarbonate vs whatever they just switched to), but they did even change the 1x1 round plate mold, as that’s the part that broke the most during my childhood. The old version was round on the inside, where the modern version is cored out a bit more, with four contact points left in the cardinal directions. This lets the rest of the sidewall flex just a bit as you pry them loose, which greatly reduces the stress put on the bottom edge.

Gravatar
By in Japan,

@thor96 said:
" @GrosPanda1979 said:
"Sadly, this set is symptomatic of what pushed me away from Technic. The sets I liked used bricks and pins and looked "solid" (if that makes sense), instead of being made out of lift-arms, panels and custom pieces of plastic like they are now."

Almost none of the old style technic set looked solid, most of them were less covered than they are now (thanks to those panels you seem to dislike). And this set is quite typical for a proper technic set- it has moving functions that you can see without disassembly but from a distance it looks "covered".
"


If you started from a clean sheet you would use the modern beams (with same height and width), connectors and panels, mainly as you can build easily both sideways and upwards. Which given you normally start from the rear car differential made far more sense then having to space Technic bricks with 2 plates to build upwards as in the 8860 car chassis. As for the paneling after 8880 something else was needed to look more realistic. I agree this is all not traditional system Lego, but Lego needed to do this before a new competitor realized and stole market share as the next generation find this far more easier to build with.

Gravatar
By in United States,

So hard to find good Technic sets like this now, maybe I should start buying 2007-2013 sets, especially seeing as they're about retail used.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@ambr:
Both System-Technic and modern Technic had problems. The old stuff just required too much bulk to do simple things, like tip the bricks vertical, or add bracing. But they fixed that by switching to beams, which significantly reduced overall size required to achieve the same result. The new stuff just wasn’t very rigid once you started building in three dimensions. By they fixed that with the “Hassenplug”, which allowed two beams to be connected at right angles where the holes are not parallel to each other. From what I understand, the current state of Technic construction should be as rigid as the old stuff, but far sturdier and compact.

Return to home page »