User talk:Straatspoor

November 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Street running has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Street running was changed by Straatspoor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875884 on 2020-11-07T17:56:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Level crossing, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Youtube is not a valid source for this information, per WP:UGC. Furthermore, what you are adding is trivia and not fit for Wikipedia. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 12:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of unsourced trivia

Hello, Please stop adding trivia to Level crossing. Wikipedia is not for indiscriminate trivia unsupported by references. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reference is the Dutch Wikipedia. That is allowed.(as far as i know) Earlier translations and additions were no problem. Straatspoor (talk) 13:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And it is not indiscriminate, because it is indicated by country. Straatspoor (talk) 13:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a reference called "numerous youtube videos" without even specifying what videos are being referenced is never acceptable. Additions such as "the trains honk at the crossings" are trivia not of interest to the average reader.

To be clear, I do appreciate that you are improving this article, which has plenty of room to be expanded. But you need to include proper references when doing so. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion it is not trivia. It's extra information. It makes the article even more interesting. Moreover, Wikipedia has the rule: ignore all the rules. Be a little tolerant. Straatspoor (talk) 13:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you familiar with WP:IIAR? Because that comes into play right now. Your additions have been reverted by several editors now. Perhaps you should consider that there is a general consensus that the type of content you are adding is not relevant to the article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The only reference i have is the Dutch Wikipedia. And the images that everyone on You Tube can check. Straatspoor (talk) 13:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm familiar with WP:IIAR,but it's so noncommittal and at same time not that it doesn't help me much."ignore the rules, but still don't". Straatspoor (talk) 14:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Several editors? There are 2. You can not call that a consensus. Straatspoor (talk) 14:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your only reference is Dutch Wikipedia, then you cannot add this information. Citing Wikipedia, even another language version, without references is not allowed. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to look for real references. Straatspoor (talk) 15:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references, as you did to Street running train! However, you should know that adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. A bare URL is a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just URL copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between <ref>...</ref> tags, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already entered one or more bare urls to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles, and to avoid future link rot, please consider supplementing your bare URLs—creating full, inline citations with title, author, date, publisher, etc. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Inline citations. Thank you. Ironmatic1 (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vraagje

Hallo Straatspoor, waarom ben je geblokkeerd op de nl.wikipedia? Cheers. Lotje (talk) 10:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo lotje.

Nog bedankt voor je stem; één stem vóór viel mij mee; ik achtte mijn kans zéér klein. Waarom ik geblokkeerd ben wil ik je graag vertellen, als je mij een emailadres stuurt (niet via de email-functie van WP). De wikipolitie👮 loert overal🥸🔎. Ik ben volledig geïntimideerd😶🤐😷, wat verboden is volgens de Universele Gedragscode. Zowel jij als Matroos Vos hebben recent hele juiste dingen gezegd. Daar wil ik (ook) graag nader op ingaan. 2 gebruikers hebben bij de stemming al gezegd mijn geblokkeerd zijn verkeerd te vinden, of te twijfelen🤔 aan de rechtmatigheid. Dat geeft al te denken.

Mvg, Straatspoor. Straatspoor (talk) 09:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vriendelijk verzoek: laat alléén lotje reageren. Negatieve reacties hierop door wie dan ook zijn ongewenst en ook niet toegestaan volgens de U.G. Straatspoor (talk) 09:37, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Straatspoor. Dank voor je reactie. Je zal dan wel je de emailfunctie moeten aanvinken hier. Je bent imo niet overal geblokkeerd, dat zal dus wel lukken :-) Lotje (talk) 11:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt. Ik weet niet wat je met samengesteld bedoeld. ⚠️ er kunnen fouten in de tekst staan, dat komt door de vertaling!

Zéér kort antwoord op je vragen: oorzaak: 3 honden vochten om één bot, één van hen (ik dus) kreeg blokkade aan zìjn broek, de anderen (die ook veelvuldig over de schreef gingen, tegen de UG in dus) mogen ongestraft doorgaan. Natuur12 blokkeerde zonder waarschuwing, wat tegen de regels is. (O.A.) De pot & de ketel / de splinter & de balk, e.d. waren van toepassing. Totaal geen empathie.

Toen ik later mijn goede wil toonde door fouten in artikelen te melden die ik dus niet kan verbeteren vanwege de blokkade, werd uit pure regelzucht mijn OP ook gesloten. Stank voor dank. Zo gaat dat op WP. Terwijl niet expliciet verboden is de OP daarvoor te gebruiken. Dat heeft bertux (die zéér "wisselvallig" over mij denkt, héél zacht gezegd)(en ook vaak de UG negeert) onlangs bevestigd. Anderen durfden de fouten niet te verbeteren, uit pure angst voor represailles. Zo "plezant" is het op WP. "Uiteraard" ben ik niet de enige die zo behandeld werd.

Wil je het uitgebreider, dan kun je een emailadres op mijn OP zetten. Dat is veiliger, denk ik.

Mijn gebruikerspagina lezen kan ook heel nuttig zijn. Daar lees je o.a. dat ik normaliter zéér vriendelijk ben.

Mvg, Straatspoor.

🔴 Dit is een privébericht, dus andere gebruikers: niet reageren a.u.b.

(ik zet dit er bij wegens slechte ervaringen, helaas). Straatspoor (talk) 14:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Straatspoor het woord "samengesteld" komt niet voor in mijn reactie hierboven. Wil je de tekst van de vertaling hier plaatsen? Kan ik meteen zien wat fout liep. Anderzijds, met aandacht nam je betoog doorgenomen. Graag zou ik mij verdiepen in je OP, maar omwille van tijdsgebrek zal dit de komende dagen niet lukken. Als je me een paar artikelen opgeeft waarin foutjes geslopen zijn zou ik deze met alle plezier aanpassen. Niemand is gebaat met errata in Wikipedia. Cheers Lotje (talk) 03:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only me again... puur uit nieuwsgierigheid (zo ben ik nu eenmaal): zegt de naam Lidewij jou iets?

Lotje (talk) 04:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Lotje. That word came trough the translation. That's why I'm now writing in English. "Of course" I know Lidewij, on WP, but also on Wikisage.

Most mistakes have been quietely🤫 fixed by others in the meantime. But if I find new ones I'll will pass them on to you. ⚠️ You run the risk of being accused of "aiding the enemy".

I advise you to take all accusations against me very critically, because is it one big one-sided POV😡 without a response (since I've been blocked). Nearly everything is twisted/misunderstood. Don't let yourself be 😵‍💫indoctrinated😵‍💫 by them. I would therefore like to see that someone add that it is totally one-sided and dishonest, and that someone removes those links to this public pillory. I am not a shoplifter; that is not how you treat people.

Mvg, Straatspoor.

🔴 This is a private message; I urgently request others not to respond, please. Straatspoor (talk) 06:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Straatspoor, ondertussen ook gegrasduind en zie dat Matroos Vos en Taketa hier reeds dieper op ingingen. Kan het zijn dat je toen ook AI inschakelde om te verwoorden wat je bedoelde? Cheers. Lotje (talk) 15:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean Automatic Intelligence, I don't use that.

Romaine also responded very correctly at that time, but it doesn't help. My case is similair to the larger drama with Jürgen Eissink in 2016. 8 years later, things are still being brouht to a head, despite all the rules. Recently at Matroos Vos. WP is sometimes a battlefield. I'm going to turn on the email function. Only for Lotje.

⛔️ Others users please do not respond.

Mvg, Straatspoor. Straatspoor (talk) 04:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now it says "mute this user" instead of "email this user" Lotje (talk) 04:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✅️ Enabled (if all goes well). Straatspoor (talk) 05:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]