Skip to content

Low-level Rise sanity check #226

@Bastacyclop

Description

@Bastacyclop

After #198 and #220, me and @johanneslenfers concluded that it would be very useful to implement some low-level Rise program sanity checks:

  • for example, parallelism hierarchy should be respected, and mapGlobal(0)(mapGlobal(0)(...)) is not a valid low-level program
  • it is possible to create writing races by using mapSeq/reduceSeq patterns in the wrong place (basically if multiple threads execute it), I think such programs should not be considered valid.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions