• Merge
  • Natural
  • Cascade
  • Oscillating
  • Polyphase
  • Normal
  • IP
  • OOP
• TimSort
• Bubble Sort
• Quicksort
  • Hoare
  • Lomuto
  • Single-Pivot
  • Dual-Pivot
  • Concurrent
  • IP
  • OOP
• Cocktail Shaker Sort
• Odd-Even Sort
• Selection Sort
  • Double
  • IP
  • OOP
• Insertion Sort
  • IP
  • OOP
• Comb Sort
• Shell Sort
• Weave Merge Sort
• Merge Insertion Sort
• Library Sort
• WikiSort/BlockSort
• GrailSort
• Kirkpatrick-Reisch Sort
• Heap Sort
  • siftUp
  • siftDown
  • Max
  • Min
  • Weak
  • Ternary
• Smooth Sort
• Tournament Sort
• Cycle Sort
• Introsort (std::sort)
• Spread Sort
• Quick Shell Sort (Introsort with Shellsort)
• Batcher's Bitonic Sort
• Batcher's Odd-Even Merge Sort
• Pairwise Sorting Network
• Sample Sort
• Pancake Sort
• Spaghetti Sort
• Patience Sort
• Radix LSD
  • Bases
  • IP
  • OOP
• Radix MSD
  • Bases
  • Swap-Hop
  • Insert-Hop
  • IP
  • OOP
• American Flag Sort
• Shatter Sort
• Simple Shatter Sort
• Flash Sort
• Time Sort
• Proxmap Sort
• Interpolation Sort
• Counting Sort
• Bucket Sort
  • Generic
  • Proxmap
  • Postmans' Sort
  • Shuffle Sort
  • In-Place
  • Out-of-Place
• Burst Sort
• Cartesian Tree Sort
• Splay Sort
• Tree Sort

Now the really really bad ones. These actually exist. Mostly for fun, so these are mostly simple.

• Stooge Sort
• Bad Sort
• Silly Sort
• Slow Sort
• Gnome Sort
• Bogo Sort
  • Randomness option
• Demon Sort
  • Rollout Motion
  • Rollin Motion
  • Randswap Motion
  • Inwards checking
  • Outwards checking
  • Concurrent mode
• DropSort
  this one actually is not a valid sorting algorithm; but there is one slightly different version that's usable at the bottom of the site.

Now the ones that will like never be implemented for various reasons

• Gravity/Bead Sort
  this one changes the values of items, which is impossible using my API. I suggest reading the wikipedia article on it, as it's very interesting.
• Pigeonhole Sort
  this one just creates a bucket for every number in the range and the puts the items in there accordingly and then puts them back in the original bucket – not generally that bad, but very much so in this program, as it's not designed to handle more than 20 buckets. It already struggles with 10. Technically its possible to implement, but I don't want to crash peoples PCs.
  I could possibly implement a In-Place version, but that'd look like magic 😅