I really enjoyed reviewing your project! You have chosen an interesting question and your report is easy to follow and well written.

Documentation

Yes it is great!

• Code was appropriately documented, README instructions were pretty clear, and the EDA gave a nice walk through of the important aspects of the data.
• I have a few suggestions in the suggestions section, but overall the project is well documented and clear for an outsider to understand.

Code

Yes it is great!

• The code is simple (in a good way!), functional, and easy to read.

Analysis and reasoning

Yes it is great!

• Seemed reasonable! I liked the discussion at the end about what it all means, it ties everything together nicely.

Communication

Yes it is great!

• The report is very clear and easy to follow.
• As someone with no domain knowledge I am curious about how you chose your alpha value?
• Not sure if I just missed it, but what does the "Any problems" column for in the report tables represent?

Suggestions

NOTE: I got pretty nit-picky with these, so feel free to not address anything you feel won't improve the end product

• A link to the EDA in GitHub when you reference it in your report would be handy!
• The data tables in the report look a bit fuzzy, perhaps changing the format from jpg to png or svg would improve the image quality.
• For the figure "The more competitive the race, the greater the turnout" in your README and report it might be easier to read with colours rather than shapes.
• Some of the references at the bottom your report are malformed (e.g. Stringr, Httr, Tidyr). These should be able to be fixed in your .bib file.
• In the README there aren't instructions on using make clean
• Extremely minor, but on your README it says "date: 28/11/2020". I'm not sure what the date refers to and using a standard date format might be more clear than DD/MM/YYYY.
• I agree with the TA that the transitions between figures in the report could be a bit smoother.

P.S. I noticed that at the end of your group contract it says "subject to chang". Is that a typo or a hilarious reference to Community?