Skip to content

Professional security audit for KAS protocol implementation #56

@superninja-app

Description

@superninja-app

Description

Commission a professional security audit of the opentdf-rs cryptographic library, with special focus on the KAS (Key Access Service) protocol implementation.

Motivation

As a cryptographic library handling sensitive data and key management, a professional security audit provides:

  • Independent verification of security properties
  • Expert review of cryptographic implementations
  • Identification of potential vulnerabilities
  • Compliance validation (FIPS, etc.)
  • Increased confidence for production deployments

Scope

Primary Focus Areas:

  1. KAS Protocol Implementation

    • Rewrap protocol flow
    • Key wrapping/unwrapping operations
    • JWT token handling
    • Authentication and authorization
  2. Cryptographic Primitives

    • RSA-OAEP implementation (aws-lc-rs integration)
    • ECDH key agreement
    • HKDF key derivation
    • AES-GCM encryption/decryption
  3. Key Management

    • Ephemeral key generation
    • Key lifecycle management
    • Secure random number generation
    • Key zeroization
  4. Error Handling

    • Information leakage in error messages
    • Timing side-channels
    • Exception safety

Secondary Areas:

  • WebCrypto integration (WASM)
  • TDF manifest parsing
  • Policy binding verification
  • Dependency security

Recommended Audit Firms

Consider firms with cryptographic expertise:

  • NCC Group
  • Trail of Bits
  • Cure53
  • Quarkslab
  • Kudelski Security

Deliverables

  1. Comprehensive security audit report
  2. Vulnerability findings with severity ratings
  3. Remediation recommendations
  4. Re-audit after fixes (if needed)
  5. Public disclosure (if appropriate)

Timeline

  • Audit duration: 2-4 weeks
  • Remediation: 2-4 weeks
  • Re-audit: 1 week

Budget Considerations

Professional security audits typically cost 0,000-00,000+ depending on scope and depth.

Benefits

  • Independent security validation
  • Increased user confidence
  • Compliance support
  • Vulnerability discovery before production issues
  • Security best practices validation

Related

Part of post-merge improvements from PR #53 security review.

Priority

High - Important for production deployments and enterprise adoption

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions