You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This was a question, but I figured it out while typing. Half finished question below
Basically I have a project and I am trying to vendor a small dependency as a subpackage so things are simpler to work with, but those code are not properly type hinted and I don't give a fuck about it. Is there some sort of
beartype_this_package(exclude="X.Y")
or some sort of nested beartype_this_package where I can supply different confs to it.
^^^
At this point I tested it out and turns out yes calling beartype_package in a subpackage just works.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This was a question, but I figured it out while typing. Half finished question below
Basically I have a project and I am trying to vendor a small dependency as a subpackage so things are simpler to work with, but those code are not properly type hinted and I don't give a fuck about it. Is there some sort of
or some sort of nested beartype_this_package where I can supply different confs to it.
^^^
At this point I tested it out and turns out yes calling beartype_package in a subpackage just works.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions