Skip to content

Invalid indices silently accepted by Clifford factory functions. #4

@cgranade

Description

@cgranade

As pointed out by @glassnotes, functions such as q.hadamard currently do not behave well at all when given indices outside the valid range given by the number of qubits. For instance,

>>> print q.hadamard(1, 1)
XI |->  +XI
IX |->  +IZ
ZI |->  +ZI
IZ |->  +IX
>>> print q.phase(1, 3)
X[3] |->  +Y[3]

These should instead raise IndexError exceptions, since there's no sensible meaning to assign to "apply the phase gate to the fourth of one qubits."

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions