You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for sharing this work, good insight and inspiring.
But I'm unable to perceive improvement of the pretrained model.
My inference of E_expression:
For images, inputs: just concat same image (1, 5, 224, 224), output: Flame parameters (5, 53), chose the center one's param ouput[2, :]
For videos, inputs: just concat same frame (1, 5, 224, 224), output: Flame parameters (5, 53), chose the center one's param ouput[2, :]. Or maybe I should try to concat continous 5 frames for E_expression input ?
My mean_shape for alignment is consist with author's.
Comparison of the results (talkinghead videos and single image reconstruction) between E_flame_without_E_expression and E_flame_with_expression:
E_flame_without_E_expression:
talkinghead_E_flame_without_E_expression.mp4
E_flame_with_expression:
talkinghead_E_flame_with_E_expression.mp4
Sorry, my test maybe not sufficient,and my preprocess maybe not accurate.
Thanks for sharing this work, good insight and inspiring.
But I'm unable to perceive improvement of the pretrained model.
My inference of E_expression:
For images, inputs: just concat same image (1, 5, 224, 224), output: Flame parameters (5, 53), chose the center one's param ouput[2, :]
For videos, inputs: just concat same frame (1, 5, 224, 224), output: Flame parameters (5, 53), chose the center one's param ouput[2, :]. Or maybe I should try to concat continous 5 frames for E_expression input ?
My mean_shape for alignment is consist with author's.
Comparison of the results (talkinghead videos and single image reconstruction) between E_flame_without_E_expression and E_flame_with_expression:
E_flame_without_E_expression:
talkinghead_E_flame_without_E_expression.mp4
E_flame_with_expression:
talkinghead_E_flame_with_E_expression.mp4
Sorry, my test maybe not sufficient,and my preprocess maybe not accurate.