Skip to content

FACIT -- Generalize ICRH effects #87

@cjperks7

Description

@cjperks7

I can do this one too

Issue

The formula used in FACIT for the ICRH effects on poloidal asymmetry assumes just D(H) minority heating. Future fusion devices (SPARC) will use other schemes such as D(He3), D/T(He3).

Plan of action

In the original derivation by M. Reinke, they obtained a general expression and then specified it to D(H) which was grabbed for use it FACIT. Pretty straight forward to change that to account for other schemes.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions