How to treat user acquisition through referral #776
Replies: 1 comment
-
| 
         Hello @aadityachouhan-ah, Thank you for contacting us! You've identified that "referrals" likely encompass a mix of organic word-of-mouth, brand awareness, and your incentive program, with only the latter being intervenable. If your primary interest was understanding the causal effect of the incentive program on your KPI, I would suggest modeling the incentive program (not referrals) as a non-media treatment. In that scenario, paying close attention to the prior (see default prior of contribution_n) and the default value of  If your primary interest was to improve the inference of the treatment variables, then you would consider referrals as a control variable. The question of whether referrals make sense as a control variable hinges on whether they act as a confounder or a strong predictor, rather than a mediator (see control variables). It would make sense as a control variable if it’s a strong predictor (e.g., the KPI is revenue-based and referrals drive a very large proportion of revenue) or if it’s a confounder (e.g, referrals cause the business to spend more on advertising). However, if referrals are a mediator variable—meaning they are caused by more advertising spend—then including them as a control variable in your model wouldn't be appropriate. It's plausible that increased advertising could lead to a rise in word-of-mouth and brand awareness, which, in turn, drives referrals. Ultimately, you'll need to determine which variable type (confounder, predictor, or mediator) referrals are most likely to be, considering the realities of your situation and the dynamics of your referral ecosystem. Based on what you've shared, my intuition, with limited knowledge of your specific business context, is that referrals might lean towards being a mediator. In this case, you would not include it as a variable in Meridian. Ultimately, you'll need to determine which variable type (confounder, predictor, mediator) referrals are most likely to be, considering realities of your business and the dynamics of your referral ecosystem. Do reach out for any further questions or suggestions regarding Meridian. Google Meridian Support Team  | 
  
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey all,
I'm trying to figure out the best way to include referral program-driven acquisitions in my MMM setup.
Initially, I modeled referrals as a non-media activity, but the model ended up attributing to referrals almost 4 times the actual number of users acquired through referrals. This seemed unintuitive, so I reclassified referrals as a control variable to remove its influence from the attribution altogether.
However, I'm not entirely confident this is the right approach. Referrals are partially controllable through incentives, yet they also reflect organic word-of-mouth and brand awareness.
Is it possible for the model to attribute significantly more to referrals than the actual direct acquisitions? And more broadly, how should referral-driven activations be treated in MMM — as a media lever, a non-media variable, or a control?
Would appreciate any insights or best practices!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions