Ingredient and Nutrition Info should have another parent #3039
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
You are right that NutritionInformation is missing on Product and it's at the SKU level and we have sku property on Product. There was just bad timing on the release of NutritionInformation I would say and so was missed on Product. YOU could internally begin adding markup with the nutrition property on Product and expect that to eventually be accepted in validators and a future release of Schema.org. My validator accepts it already on Product and fails if found on IndividualProduct (serialized items). Besides directly with Schema.org, you can certainly use the GS1 extension and making a nutritional claim statement with gs1:nutritionalInfo. Your best bet is to use JSON-LD format in this case. Take a look online at markup examples on various previous blog posts and developer repos that show examples of combining Schema.org with GS1. @philarcher any other thoughts here? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently, Ingredients exist in Recipe which, along with MenuItem, also contains NutritionInformation.
Every time you're at the grocery store, you walk by aisles of products containing NutritionInformation and Ingredients. But these items aren't Recipes, per se. And they aren't really MenuItems either. I think Product may benefit from adding these property fields to the model. Anybody else?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions