Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Totally on board with the idea. Somethings must be fine tuned before considering it, v1 ready. I think it can start as It would be better to create a version roadmap. The set of features included in each version and for each have a development environment setup and a production ready deploy option (LB/Reverse Proxy/..). BTW Github Projects can be a useful way to organise the project ToDos. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
I have done this. I chose to start at |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This started as a small app for myself but has grown with many more features, and will continue to do so.
However, It is not yet (IMO) 'Version 1' quality. There are a few basics that still need to be added and things I'd like to change.
So, I'd like to 're-version' the library down to say
0.5.0. This gives a lot of room to grow while still showing that the system is 'young'.I'll leave this open for a week, and if there are no comments or good reasons not to, I'll do as above.
Unsure whether to delete the previous releases or to re-version them. It is easier to upgrade derivatives of this project if you can take a diff from an existing release, so I'll most likely reversion and leave them.
@pdrivom comments?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions