A yogi seemingly dies while simulating death and his evil second wife, and her daughter, try to force his daughter into insanity for control of his estate.A yogi seemingly dies while simulating death and his evil second wife, and her daughter, try to force his daughter into insanity for control of his estate.A yogi seemingly dies while simulating death and his evil second wife, and her daughter, try to force his daughter into insanity for control of his estate.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
David Keir
- Removal Man
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
This British film begins with learning that Mr. Clavering (Sidney James) is a follower of Eastern mysticism and is married to a horrid second wife, Bertha. He knows he's dying and decides to try out a particularly difficult and dangerous stunt...to put himself into a death-like trance. He demands absolute silence...claiming it could be fatal if anyone makes any noise. During this exhibition, a painting falls off the wall...and Clavering appears to actually be dead!
When the will is read, the bulk of the estate is to be given to Clavering's daughter from his first marriage, Joan. However, Bertha and her viper-like daughter are allowed to stay in the house and the will stipulates that Bertha is to advise and oversee Joan until she reaches 21. Bertha instead decides her best route is to instead try to drive Joan mad and take the fortune for herself! To do so, she begins 'gaslighting' Joan. In other words, acts as if things are just fine and gets Joan to doubt her own sanity. To assist, is a particularly vicious thug, Victor. So what's next? See the film.
I give this film kudos for being darned clever. The script is very well written--with nice unexpected twists, a terrific ending and wonderful dialog. All in all, a nice little suspense film that manages to offer a few genuine surprises.
When the will is read, the bulk of the estate is to be given to Clavering's daughter from his first marriage, Joan. However, Bertha and her viper-like daughter are allowed to stay in the house and the will stipulates that Bertha is to advise and oversee Joan until she reaches 21. Bertha instead decides her best route is to instead try to drive Joan mad and take the fortune for herself! To do so, she begins 'gaslighting' Joan. In other words, acts as if things are just fine and gets Joan to doubt her own sanity. To assist, is a particularly vicious thug, Victor. So what's next? See the film.
I give this film kudos for being darned clever. The script is very well written--with nice unexpected twists, a terrific ending and wonderful dialog. All in all, a nice little suspense film that manages to offer a few genuine surprises.
Based on the British radio series Appointment with Fear and one of Hammer's earliest ventures into horror, albeit as a film noir thriller, smoking and murder are the order of the day with The Man in Black. Despite all its creaks and groans of cliché, the film remains a thoroughly entertaining watch, filled with spooky kitchen sink melodrama and enjoyable performances. The direction by Francis Searle is adequately engaging, with plenty of moody images which bolster the otherwise notably cheap production and relatively straight-laced script. The interplay between Betty Ann Davies and Sheila Burrell makes up the heart of this film's runtime, and they achieve some sinister moments, yet can also be very funny together, managing to be both repellently toxic and beguilingly seductive at the same time. We are also treated to some prime Sid James in one of his earliest film roles, long before his part in the Carry On ensemble. Here, he plays a serious and quite sober role with conviction, even going as far as to play a dual role, something he does with perfect competence. There are a couple of interesting twists and turns to The Man in Black, but this isn't a classic for a reason; the titular character plays no real part in the narrative, and we don't even see him on screen again after the opening credits end but the film keeps up a relatively breezy pace to the point where, if you're engaging with it, you'll scarcely notice.
Stealing From Radio was a Common Occurrence in the Movies and Television.
This Early Hammer Studios Rendition of a Popular BBC Radio Series is Very Well Done with Excellent Costumes, Make-Up, Acting, and Sets.
The Studio seems to be Firing on All Cylinders with this Effort.
It is a Harbinger of the Style and Success that Hammer would be come Known for After its Break-Through in the Mid 50's.
The Acting is Above Average for this Type of Thing.
And the Snappy Script Keeps Things Hopping and the Two Females that "Gaslight" are Creepy and Loathsome.
Sidney James has a Dual Role.
The Ending is a one of Surprise.
But some may Find it was Telegraphed in the First-Act.
One of the Better of its Type. Worth a Watch to See Early Hammer at Work and for the Overall Production that is Above Average.
This Early Hammer Studios Rendition of a Popular BBC Radio Series is Very Well Done with Excellent Costumes, Make-Up, Acting, and Sets.
The Studio seems to be Firing on All Cylinders with this Effort.
It is a Harbinger of the Style and Success that Hammer would be come Known for After its Break-Through in the Mid 50's.
The Acting is Above Average for this Type of Thing.
And the Snappy Script Keeps Things Hopping and the Two Females that "Gaslight" are Creepy and Loathsome.
Sidney James has a Dual Role.
The Ending is a one of Surprise.
But some may Find it was Telegraphed in the First-Act.
One of the Better of its Type. Worth a Watch to See Early Hammer at Work and for the Overall Production that is Above Average.
It's interesting to see Sid James play a straight (albeit brief) role for change in this simple little crime thriller. He is a wealthy chap with a rather venal second wife and step-daughter. His obsession with mysticism leads, one evening, to a risky experiment and it all goes wrong... We have no absence of potential culprits as his new family try to drive his daughter out of her mind so they can inherit his fortune. Betty Ann Davies is good as the scheming the wife, with Sheila Burrell likewise as her ghastly, grasping, daughter all manipulating poor old "Joan" (Hazel Penwarden) in a decently paced mystery. Sadly the ending is writ a bit large from fairly early on, and that makes it all sag a bit - maybe Francis Searle could have tightened it up by a quarter of an hour? It's still an enjoyable watch, though - with a slightly more sophisticated script (that may owe something to it's BBC radio heritage). It is rarely shown nowadays, but is worth seeing through if you encounter it.
Although on IMDb this is tagged as a horror movie as well as a thriller - it is not a horror film. It's a thriller, very film noir(ish). The seance might be the only real impression this a horror film. Sure there is a man speaking in a "spooky voice" in the beginning of it, a man simulating his own death through yoga, a woman seemingly going insane, ugly step-mom and step-sister trying to drive her mad but the film is a thriller... maybe with some over/under tones of horror.
I will have to agree this movie is similar to Gaslight (1944) It's sorta a rehash of it but with the mystery removed. Gaslight the better film but this one isn't all that bad.
This film helped Hammer to pave it's way into the horror genre and is worth a watch but not a film to go out of your way to find.
5/10
I will have to agree this movie is similar to Gaslight (1944) It's sorta a rehash of it but with the mystery removed. Gaslight the better film but this one isn't all that bad.
This film helped Hammer to pave it's way into the horror genre and is worth a watch but not a film to go out of your way to find.
5/10
Did you know
- TriviaHazel Penwarden receives an "introducing" credit.
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 20m(80 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content