Abomination: The Evilmaker II

Aspiring to be an Evil Dead homage (or rip-off), this piece of trash has tons of advantages over Evil Dead, and yet produces an unwatchable idiotic movie. Every aspect you can think of in the movie-making process is poorly done here. Hell, even the "best boy" effed up his job. The makeup was horrible, the special effects were...whatever is the opposite of special. Mundane Effects technician is what they had. One thing that is has, is consistency. You definitely cannot say that any part is crappier than any of the others. They're all equally crappy. If you dare to test your patience, please make sure to be somewhat drunk, or to have lots of friends around you that can make fun of movies. This one deserves the lousy treatment.

This movie deserves 0 stars. The script is dumb, the actors are bad, and the camera operator doesn't know what he/she is doing. The editing was good though, but the way the film is presented, meaning how its like a home video, is really dumb. I warn you,do not waste your money on this pathetic movie.

"Abomination: EvilMaker 2" is an adequate sequel to the original without going over the same ground. The new lead is not as powerful as the original (Stephanie Beaton), but she comes across as so sincere and good-natured that she does the job. Big surprise is Jon Wilmot, who underplays the role of the disgraced ex-cop successfully. It is indeed Felicia Pandolfi, back in form as one of our favorite "b-movie goth chicks" who brings the most energy. Musical score is above average for an effort of this type. DVD also has some very good features about the making of the film, and the film makers, to their credit, point out several obstacles they had to try to overcome to finish the film. The last 20:00 does contain some good twist and turns, one or two that I could not predict. Whereas the b-movie horror makers in California are more or less a heartless machine (I've never liked the films of Fred Ray, Winorski or their ilk), I would prefer renting or buying a horror film done for the right reasons, like this one. It took a second viewing to spot the subtle color scheme whenever sister Racheal appears. Here's hoping there will be a nice wrap up, completing a memorable low-budget trilogy.

Out of all of the low-budget, independent films that I have viewed over the years, this on really takes the cake. It is downright AWFUL! Very, very, very poor acting, and a totally ridiculous plot. Even the Gothic girls in the film were just white trash in black. The "special effects" consisted of making a guys eyes glow red. Herschell Gordon Lewis did 100 times better than this 30 years ago. Avoid this film. Don't waste your time watching this crap. I'm not going to complain about the poor quality of the DVD, or the deceptive hype on the back of it, but I have to say that this is just stupid. A total waste of time. Maybe if I had saw the first one, I might be able to follow that plot a little more easily (but I Doubt it). I will say that the special features were pretty good, several trailers for films that looked waaaaay better than this one, and even "bloopers" (as if the film itself wasn't a 100 min. blooper) and a "making of" segment. Honestly, I would rather watch paint dry.

I could not believe this movie when i pressed play. We were greeting by this fat ugly looking woman with her breasts hanging out! I gave it a chance and was not surprised when it SUCKED! I could not follow the story line at all. The actors were so fake and unpersuading. The gore and blood was very amateur. Camera angles, editing, and sets looked so cheesy and homemade it made me sick. I watched bits of the special features to laugh, I watched a few outtakes as "cathy" is reciting her terrible cheesy line and she bursts out laughing. I did that threw the whole movie.I didn't understand how this movie made it to Hollywood video? We definitely took this one back and got our 3 bucks back because I wouldn't watch it for 3 bucks if you paid me! "starring SEXY Cathy" sexy ya hmmm