Page 3
- 2005
- 2h 19m
IMDb RATING
7.3/10
7.1K
YOUR RATING
A look at Mumbai's socialite party circle world through the eyes of a Page 3 journalist.A look at Mumbai's socialite party circle world through the eyes of a Page 3 journalist.A look at Mumbai's socialite party circle world through the eyes of a Page 3 journalist.
- Awards
- 7 wins & 16 nominations total
Suchitra Pillai
- Fashion Designer Sonal Roy
- (as Suchitra Pillai-Malik)
Kunika Sadanand
- Monaz Modi
- (as Kunika)
Featured reviews
Page 3 is one of those films Madhur Bhandarkar makes to expose societal filth. It's partly compelling, but, like most of Bhandarkar's films, it is one-sided and overly pessimistic. This film is all about tabloid journalism, gossip, celebrities, exposing the lives of socialites, whose lifestyle is disastrously boastful, peculiar and repulsive. They party, they care for nothing but fame, they plan parties at funerals, they are craving for more money and a higher reputation, they will do anything to get due exposure in the media, to get their names boldly printed on the daily newspaper's social column known as "Page 3" with huge photographs which will be the center of people's discussions. They are attention seeking, salacious and hypocritical. The film industry is shown as sleazy, with casting couch being a common phenomenon among filmmakers. That's where our lovely heroine, a young social column reporter Madhvi Sharma, is thrown. All these people from Mumbai's elite depend on her articles and she is the right person to befriend at these parties if you want her to mention you in her article. Later in the film we learn that even those who are Madhvi's friends are no different from these high-society people. This was tough viewing for me, although the film is unquestionably brave and the issues it deals with are interesting.
The film's music is average. The only passable songs are "Kitne Ajeeb" and "Huzoor-E-Ala", sung by the two melody queens Lata Mangeshkar and Asha Bhosle, respectively. Otherwise the soundtrack is bad. One song which was particularly horrendous is "Filmy Very Filmy". The film's writing is quite good. The second half is far better than the first, as it turns more matter-of-fact and exposes much more important issues such as terrorism and child abuse. That's where the film has to be applauded. It was sad to know that people prefer to ignore such crimes out of fear and Konkona Sen Sharma's character's disappointment was very easy to relate to. She is effective throughout the film and her acting in the last few scenes is particularly impressive. Atul Kulkarni's part is very small but he did full justice to it. Boman Irani is solid as the newspaper's editor. Sandhya Mridul is lovable as Madhvi's sassy roommate Pearl who marries an older man for money and is honest enough to admit it. The film's ending is really well-done, and provides a certain sigh of relief after the unimaginably tough revelations. Page 3 is a decent film, it is interesting and at times moving, but the level of interest and its general quality are marred by its exaggerated, overly messy and negative portrayal of the rich and famous.
The film's music is average. The only passable songs are "Kitne Ajeeb" and "Huzoor-E-Ala", sung by the two melody queens Lata Mangeshkar and Asha Bhosle, respectively. Otherwise the soundtrack is bad. One song which was particularly horrendous is "Filmy Very Filmy". The film's writing is quite good. The second half is far better than the first, as it turns more matter-of-fact and exposes much more important issues such as terrorism and child abuse. That's where the film has to be applauded. It was sad to know that people prefer to ignore such crimes out of fear and Konkona Sen Sharma's character's disappointment was very easy to relate to. She is effective throughout the film and her acting in the last few scenes is particularly impressive. Atul Kulkarni's part is very small but he did full justice to it. Boman Irani is solid as the newspaper's editor. Sandhya Mridul is lovable as Madhvi's sassy roommate Pearl who marries an older man for money and is honest enough to admit it. The film's ending is really well-done, and provides a certain sigh of relief after the unimaginably tough revelations. Page 3 is a decent film, it is interesting and at times moving, but the level of interest and its general quality are marred by its exaggerated, overly messy and negative portrayal of the rich and famous.
Page 3 (2005) :
Brief Review -
A full-fledged exposé of entertainment journalism, PR machinery, business world & film industry. While widely acknowledged for exposing the darker side of cinema, I feel it is equally a meaningful film that dares to question the moral fabric of industries and people working in it. Bhandarkar crafted a powerful narrative filled with fresh conflicts, though unfortunately, he later turned many of these ideas into clichés in his subsequent films. Unlike Heroine, which felt more personal and limited, Page 3 retains a larger purpose. Told from the perspective of a journalist, the film could perhaps have had a broader impact if seen through a different lens, but its core remains compelling. While the entire story revolves around the entertainment world, the most remarkable character comes from outside it-crime reporter Vinayak Mane, played brilliantly by Atul Kulkarni. Mane dominates every scene, not just with his commanding presence but with his sharp intellect and biting words. While flaws can be found in nearly every other character, Mane's is portrayed with rare perfection. Konkona Sen Sharma delivers a memorable performance as an honest entertainment journalist struggling to survive in a fake and black world. The film opens by delving into one of the industry's darkest realities-PR-and instantly grabs attention. Bhandarkar maintains that grip throughout, weaving an explosive story with a gripping screenplay. Between the endless revelations of manipulation, betrayal, and moral compromise, he places a few deeply emotional and meaningful moments, preventing the film from sinking entirely into cynicism. Credit must go to Bhandarkar for his courage. Being part of the industry himself, it took real guts to expose its people and practices so boldly. Ironically, I can't say the same about today's world of entertainment journalism, which often avoids such confrontation. Even two decades later, Page 3 feels startlingly relevant, perhaps even more so, because PR culture, betrayal, and superficial stardom have only worsened in the digital age. Among Bhandarkar's trilogy of Page 3, Fashion, and Heroine, it is this film that remains his finest. The timing of its release was perfect-and its impact, lasting.
RATING - 7/10*
By - #samthebestest.
A full-fledged exposé of entertainment journalism, PR machinery, business world & film industry. While widely acknowledged for exposing the darker side of cinema, I feel it is equally a meaningful film that dares to question the moral fabric of industries and people working in it. Bhandarkar crafted a powerful narrative filled with fresh conflicts, though unfortunately, he later turned many of these ideas into clichés in his subsequent films. Unlike Heroine, which felt more personal and limited, Page 3 retains a larger purpose. Told from the perspective of a journalist, the film could perhaps have had a broader impact if seen through a different lens, but its core remains compelling. While the entire story revolves around the entertainment world, the most remarkable character comes from outside it-crime reporter Vinayak Mane, played brilliantly by Atul Kulkarni. Mane dominates every scene, not just with his commanding presence but with his sharp intellect and biting words. While flaws can be found in nearly every other character, Mane's is portrayed with rare perfection. Konkona Sen Sharma delivers a memorable performance as an honest entertainment journalist struggling to survive in a fake and black world. The film opens by delving into one of the industry's darkest realities-PR-and instantly grabs attention. Bhandarkar maintains that grip throughout, weaving an explosive story with a gripping screenplay. Between the endless revelations of manipulation, betrayal, and moral compromise, he places a few deeply emotional and meaningful moments, preventing the film from sinking entirely into cynicism. Credit must go to Bhandarkar for his courage. Being part of the industry himself, it took real guts to expose its people and practices so boldly. Ironically, I can't say the same about today's world of entertainment journalism, which often avoids such confrontation. Even two decades later, Page 3 feels startlingly relevant, perhaps even more so, because PR culture, betrayal, and superficial stardom have only worsened in the digital age. Among Bhandarkar's trilogy of Page 3, Fashion, and Heroine, it is this film that remains his finest. The timing of its release was perfect-and its impact, lasting.
RATING - 7/10*
By - #samthebestest.
The first review I saw of Page 3 said "what is madhur bhandarkar finally wants to say?". Should he say something so decisive.
The most beautiful thing about Page 3 is it doesn't take sides. No propaganda whatsoever. This is the film that captures so many angles of an issue(I don't know what do I call as an "issue" here) and yet like any mediocre movie doesn't come up with an solution. I was so intrigued when I realized that the movie ended almost in the same scenario just like it started.
The movie defines so many characters who are completely with completely different priorities and different ideologies and yet they are all a part of the system which is all the more apathetic. I wish i can say more but there would be more spoilers ahead. So watch Page 3 if you wanna see one of the most mature films of the recent times.
The most beautiful thing about Page 3 is it doesn't take sides. No propaganda whatsoever. This is the film that captures so many angles of an issue(I don't know what do I call as an "issue" here) and yet like any mediocre movie doesn't come up with an solution. I was so intrigued when I realized that the movie ended almost in the same scenario just like it started.
The movie defines so many characters who are completely with completely different priorities and different ideologies and yet they are all a part of the system which is all the more apathetic. I wish i can say more but there would be more spoilers ahead. So watch Page 3 if you wanna see one of the most mature films of the recent times.
The Write Word
What you see is what you get. Not really! What Madhur Bhandarkar's brave and brilliant 'Page 3' does is destroy the myth attached to the glam and glitterati that colour the pages of our newspapers and whose lives(read party habits) we follow with such maniacal fervour which only our intrinsic voyeuristic streak can explain.
The page 3 phenomenon is as deplorable as it is enigmatic. How exactly did it gain such control over the printed word and when did it start to encroach into the front page is subject for another debate. Bhandarkar cleverly avoids that. He is concerned only with the mechanisms of this grotesque existence. And in doing that, he pieces together the various elements of this way of life. Like Robert Altman(although I'm not comparing Bhandarkar to Altman's genius), Bhandarkar uses myriad characters to further his motive. Whether it is a page 3 wannabe NRI, the gate-crashers, the newly-rich, an upcoming model, a socialite politician or an erotic novella authoress; all the characters are introduced with an objective and each of them has a separate character-sketch, even if their parts may be miniscule. And therein lays the film's appeal.
Konkona Sen Sharma plays Madhavi Sharma, a young and talented journalist who covers page 3 for Nation Today. Initially content with her job, she soon begins to see the ugliness of this underbelly that is covered by its fake and cosmetic profligacy. But Bhandarkar resists the temptation to make this subject into a moral-policing movie and avoids concentrating on one character alone. Hence the movie is not only about Madhavi, but also equally about Deepak Suri(Boman Irani)- Madhavi's editor who passively accepts his role as a cog of a larger machinery, Anjali Thapar(Soni Razdan)- a socialite suffocating from the social pollution, Abhijeet(Rehan Engineer)- a homosexual make-up artist and Madhavi's roommates Pearl(Sandhya Mridul)- the sassy airhostess and Gayatri(Tara Sharma)-an aspiring actress. It seems like an impossible task to assimilate so many characters(and more) in one story, but full credit to Nina Arora and Manoj Tyagi for penning a tight screenplay. The dialogues by Sanjeev Datta and Bhandarkar have been written with great attention to detail.
Any narrative, no matter how good, can fall flat with the lack of genuine performances. Thankfully, 'Page 3' brims with actors and not stars. Konkona goes through her author-backed role with effortless ease. Ditto Boman. Sandhya Mridul gets the best written part, but almost overdoes it. Atul Kulkarni is wasted though with an underwritten character. At times, the director seems too keen to incorporate as much as possible(paedophilia, homosexuality, etc.). But the contexts in which they are used do not make them look rushed.
Ultimately, Bhandarkar's attempt is to satiate our voyeurism, but he takes it a step further. He takes us inside the photographs and exposes us to the gruesome realities of this sect of humanity that strangely seems to be living in a different and remote world. These are the same people that indulged in new-year's revelry while a few hundred kilometers away their fellow countrymen had been ravaged by nature's ferocity! Clever writing, skillfully incorporated songs, able performances and a genuine feeling of sincerity are what make this film worthy in spite of its lack of finesse and poor production values. 'Page 3' is an optimum way to enter a new year of cinema.
Rating- ****
* Poor ** Average *** Good **** Very Good ***** Excellent
29th January, 2005
What you see is what you get. Not really! What Madhur Bhandarkar's brave and brilliant 'Page 3' does is destroy the myth attached to the glam and glitterati that colour the pages of our newspapers and whose lives(read party habits) we follow with such maniacal fervour which only our intrinsic voyeuristic streak can explain.
The page 3 phenomenon is as deplorable as it is enigmatic. How exactly did it gain such control over the printed word and when did it start to encroach into the front page is subject for another debate. Bhandarkar cleverly avoids that. He is concerned only with the mechanisms of this grotesque existence. And in doing that, he pieces together the various elements of this way of life. Like Robert Altman(although I'm not comparing Bhandarkar to Altman's genius), Bhandarkar uses myriad characters to further his motive. Whether it is a page 3 wannabe NRI, the gate-crashers, the newly-rich, an upcoming model, a socialite politician or an erotic novella authoress; all the characters are introduced with an objective and each of them has a separate character-sketch, even if their parts may be miniscule. And therein lays the film's appeal.
Konkona Sen Sharma plays Madhavi Sharma, a young and talented journalist who covers page 3 for Nation Today. Initially content with her job, she soon begins to see the ugliness of this underbelly that is covered by its fake and cosmetic profligacy. But Bhandarkar resists the temptation to make this subject into a moral-policing movie and avoids concentrating on one character alone. Hence the movie is not only about Madhavi, but also equally about Deepak Suri(Boman Irani)- Madhavi's editor who passively accepts his role as a cog of a larger machinery, Anjali Thapar(Soni Razdan)- a socialite suffocating from the social pollution, Abhijeet(Rehan Engineer)- a homosexual make-up artist and Madhavi's roommates Pearl(Sandhya Mridul)- the sassy airhostess and Gayatri(Tara Sharma)-an aspiring actress. It seems like an impossible task to assimilate so many characters(and more) in one story, but full credit to Nina Arora and Manoj Tyagi for penning a tight screenplay. The dialogues by Sanjeev Datta and Bhandarkar have been written with great attention to detail.
Any narrative, no matter how good, can fall flat with the lack of genuine performances. Thankfully, 'Page 3' brims with actors and not stars. Konkona goes through her author-backed role with effortless ease. Ditto Boman. Sandhya Mridul gets the best written part, but almost overdoes it. Atul Kulkarni is wasted though with an underwritten character. At times, the director seems too keen to incorporate as much as possible(paedophilia, homosexuality, etc.). But the contexts in which they are used do not make them look rushed.
Ultimately, Bhandarkar's attempt is to satiate our voyeurism, but he takes it a step further. He takes us inside the photographs and exposes us to the gruesome realities of this sect of humanity that strangely seems to be living in a different and remote world. These are the same people that indulged in new-year's revelry while a few hundred kilometers away their fellow countrymen had been ravaged by nature's ferocity! Clever writing, skillfully incorporated songs, able performances and a genuine feeling of sincerity are what make this film worthy in spite of its lack of finesse and poor production values. 'Page 3' is an optimum way to enter a new year of cinema.
- Abhishek Bandekar
Rating- ****
* Poor ** Average *** Good **** Very Good ***** Excellent
29th January, 2005
Page 3 is most definitely a very enthralling and captivating eye-opener that very cleverly exposes the hypocrite lifestyles of Mumbai's elite. From the fake kisses to the plastered smiles, Page 3 leaves no stone unturned in revealing the shocking lives of the rich and the famous. Backstabbing, gossip, corruption, and scandal lurk in every dark corner in the world of glitz and glam. Humanity and generosity are analogous to an oasis in the desert in this world where Social Darwinism is the prevailing mentality. Everyone is constantly craving for more money, more fame, and a higher reputation, driving them to do the most shameful things imaginable ranging from signing film contracts at a funeral to child molestation. Anything is possible in this metropolis where there is a such a wide gap between the social classes. The audience sees the ugliness of both of these classes through the eyes of the protagonist. She observes the suffocating atmosphere and the mind-boggling frenzy that the socialites live in. Bollywood, business tycoons, politicians, and the underworld are all intertwined in a completely convoluted mess! Kitne Ajeeb Hai is a nice track as is the peppy Kuan Main Doob Jaongi. Terrific film with excellent character development!
Did you know
- TriviaThe role of Madhvi was first offered to Kareena Kapoor, but she declined.
- Quotes
Madhvi Sharma: Next time, lock the door.
- ConnectionsFollowed by Corporate (2006)
- SoundtracksFilmy Very Filmy
Written by Sandeep Nath
Composed by Shamir Tandon
Performed by Amit Kumar, BlaaZe and Tannishtha Chatterjee
Courtesy of Virgin Records (India) Pvt. Ltd.
- How long is Page 3?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Also known as
- The Society Page
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 2h 19m(139 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content