Spoof of romantic comedies which focuses on a woman, her crush, her parents, and her father.Spoof of romantic comedies which focuses on a woman, her crush, her parents, and her father.Spoof of romantic comedies which focuses on a woman, her crush, her parents, and her father.
- Directors
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 4 wins & 1 nomination total
Valery M. Ortiz
- Jell-O
- (as Valery Ortiz)
Charlie Dell
- Justice of the Peace
- (as Charles Dell)
- Directors
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
This has got to be one of the worst parody movies ever. No, wait - scratch that. This is one of the worst movies ever. There were so few laughs in this supposed comedy. They few chuckles I heard from the audience was a nervous laughter (as in, "I can't believe I wasted my money on this..."). The toilet humor (literally) was simply retarded, and a few jokes almost worked... if they were funny. Pretty much all of the characters were annoying, and most of the parodies themselves were just unfunny. I really don't know what could have been done to save this movie and actually make it funny. The concept was great, and "date movies" are ripe for being made fun of... yet somehow this just wasn't it.
My four other friends and I wanted to see a movie that would make us laugh and have a good time. We narrowed it down to Pink Panther or Date Movie. We decided on Date Movie. We went to the theater about 15 minutes early and when we first came in we were the only ones there, which surprised us. By the time the movie started, there were only three other groups of people, which surprised us. By ten minutes into the movie, we were no longer surprised. The movie was horrid. It was full of disgusting jokes, and not just in a sexual way. I was surprised anyone even bothered making this movie. About 45 minutes in, I was disgusted and bored. My friends were, too. I'm not the type to walk out during a movie. I never have before, but this movie was a waste of my time, the 11 bucks I spent on the ticket, and the five bucks I spent on popcorn/ candy. I have never seen a movie as bad as this one, and I have seen a lot of bad movies. Usually I'm not this prude, but this movie made me worry about our generation.
The fact that this movie was allowed to advance past the "script writing" stage is beyond me.
If I could vote it 0, believe me I would. Watching paint dry would be a more cultural experience.
They actually re-created scenes from existing comedy movies & virtually did them note for note. Can somebody explain the word parody to the film makers???
Some of the acting was quite good, it's just a shame that they had so little to work with to be able to assist with making this pile of junk watchable.
If I could vote it 0, believe me I would. Watching paint dry would be a more cultural experience.
They actually re-created scenes from existing comedy movies & virtually did them note for note. Can somebody explain the word parody to the film makers???
Some of the acting was quite good, it's just a shame that they had so little to work with to be able to assist with making this pile of junk watchable.
I'd imagine that the main reason that people are paying to watch this is because it stars Alyson Hannigan. Well, she's in it, and she makes the most of a thoroughly unchallenging role, but unless you're a total completist, that shouldn't be enough of a reason to waste even 80 minutes of your life on this appalling waste of talent.
What the writer/directors seem to have missed is that if you're going to parody or satirise a scene from a decent movie, you actually have to add something. It's not sufficient to just throw a bunch of stolen scenes together in the hope that the conjunction will generate humour by itself. I honestly could not see one - not ONE - original thought or idea or line in the script or direction. That in itself is something of an achievement. The whole thing plays like it was scripted by teenagers, and not teenagers from the top end of the grade curve.
In fact, I have to wonder if this films is deliberately aimed at the lowest common denominator. If so, it missed by several yards to the south.
What the writer/directors seem to have missed is that if you're going to parody or satirise a scene from a decent movie, you actually have to add something. It's not sufficient to just throw a bunch of stolen scenes together in the hope that the conjunction will generate humour by itself. I honestly could not see one - not ONE - original thought or idea or line in the script or direction. That in itself is something of an achievement. The whole thing plays like it was scripted by teenagers, and not teenagers from the top end of the grade curve.
In fact, I have to wonder if this films is deliberately aimed at the lowest common denominator. If so, it missed by several yards to the south.
This won't be a long review, as this movie doesn't warrant much more than a warning not to waste your money on it. I'm not sure how a movie so god-awful can make it to screen, but my faith in the system has been shaken. The film isn't funny, I'm not sure if it tries to be or not, but it's not. It references other movies (Meet the Parents, When Harry met Sally etc.) but doesn't really spoof them. This was the biggest problem I believe, as it doesn't have any semblance of flow or sense. Random scenes pop up, trying to get a laugh by basically reenacting the scene, not exaggerating it or making fun of it. I managed to sit through House of the Dead, but this film actually made me angry it was so unfunny. Please skip it, have one of your friends go see it instead and then ask about it. If they don't knock your teeth out for setting them up to lose money and 90 minutes of their life, then you can go see it yourself.
Did you know
- TriviaThis movie was screened for critics before release, which is rare for a Aaron Seltzer and Jason Friedberg movie.
- Goofs(at around 3 mins) When Julia is doing her "Milkshake" dance, she starts dancing to the taxi driver. In a side shot, the camera is reflected in the side of the taxi.
- Quotes
Roz Fockyerdoder: [gives Julia the present after the wedding] It's a vaginal thermometer. It's been in our family for generations.
Linda Jones: It lets you know when your ovulating.
Roz Fockyerdoder: And if you wanna keep it a lucky one, don't ever wash it.
- Alternate versionsThe 85-minute extended, unrated version is only about 2 minutes longer and there are some changes:
- In the scene spoofing The Bachelor, the dialogue introducing Grant is different.
- The scene with the cat on the toilet is longer.
- There is some extra dialogue after the wizard gets kicked in the crotch.
- Grant's last name is "Fockyerdoder" instead of "Funkyerdoder".
- Julia shows Jack two extra cards.
- When Nicky is thinking about the honeymoon, the dialogue is different.
- The scene where Roz & Linda are talking is much more explicit.
- Andy's introduction is longer and more suggestive.
- ConnectionsFeatured in 20 to 1: Adults Only 20 to 01: Sexiest Movie Scenes (2009)
- SoundtracksBridal Chorus
Written by Richard Wagner
Arranged by James Harpham and John Gale
Courtesy of 5 Alarm Music
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Untitled Aaron Seltzer/Jason Friedberg Project
- Filming locations
- Church of the Angels - 1100 Avenue 64, Pasadena, California, USA(Exterior shot - Location for Julia and Grant's wedding)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $20,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $48,548,426
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $19,076,261
- Feb 19, 2006
- Gross worldwide
- $85,749,034
- Runtime
- 1h 23m(83 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content