Now You See Me 2

The 1980s-inspired sequel reimagines the original blockbuster by emphasizing the individuals and their distinctive features. Both new converts and admirers of the original should find the revisit enjoyable.

The grand illusion thriller "Now You See Me" borrowed ideas from Soderbergh's "Ocean's" series and Christopher Nolan's "The Prestige". With a convoluted plot and a chatty, fiercely competitive group of renegade magician heroes, the film was both witty and bordering on ridiculous.

The movie features a number of jaw-dropping moments, fake-outs, and teases. The film's denouement is always focused on the audience, with the Horsemen-a troupe of illusionists-stranded on a private jet. The movie is an exhilarating and suspenseful roller coaster since it never stops winking.

As a film this really is poor. On practically every level it falls down… Now You See Me 2 picks up directly where the first film left off and the film follows a similar pattern – The 4 (or 5?) horsemen, performing larger-than-life magic with the aim of providing for those less fortunate or exposing those who do wrong. However, unlike the first, their motivations behind each of these stunts are a little less clear and certainly less meaningful. In fact inconsistent or unlikely character motivations and actions are a problem throughout the film (with supporting characters as well as the leads).Then there's the fact that this plot is so unrealistic and beyond the realms of possibility that it makes the first script look practically normal. The script in itself is a problem… it's messy, incongruent and forced – "well we need to have a shootout/car chase, otherwise it won't be cool enough".

Then there's the fact that Isla Fisher's character has left the gang and although briefly explained at the beginning of the film, is never mentioned again. Yet her replacement (played by Lizzy Caplan) is not only treated as if she's been there since the beginning, but also held responsible for all the actions she wasn't around for in the first film. I get the feeling it might have been easier for her just to play Isla Fisher's character (Katie Holmes-Maggie Gyllenhaal in Batman style) rather than trying to shoehorn in a different character. And talking of characters – Daniel Radcliffe's character is atrocious. I don't want to give anything away but he is such a stereotypical, spoilt, British man it's untrue. Moreover his acting in this was reminiscent of all his appalling, wooden performances from the early Harry Potter films… And just I was starting to believe that maybe he could act!

And then there are issues around plot holes, speech which is purely for the viewers' benefit, seemingly irrelevant sub-plots and a ridiculously backwards ending which doesn't appear to make much sense.

So how the hell, given all these problems, does it give it get a 6 I hear you cry? Well, as with the first, it is still thoroughly entertaining. It's light-hearted fun, which isn't really tackling any of the world's serious topics and as a spectacle is still great. Sure I found myself thinking of several occasions 'my god this is garbage', but it didn't annoy me. It's the kind of film where you can laugh off the issues and appreciate the fun parts.

In summary, if you liked the first one, I certainly wouldn't discourage you from seeing NYSM2. I'd just go in with limited expectations and an acceptance that many aspects of it aren't going to be very good. If you have those two things you'll probably enjoy it thoroughly, despite all its flaws.

It's just like the first movie...it takes you into the mind of magic tricks and just how easy, hard and confusing and well timed it can be. It's interesting to see just how they do it, because we keep forgetting it's all fake and not real. This movie is magic mixed with a robbery heist all combined into one.

All the actors return, excluding Isla Fisher. This time we have a lady by the name of Lula (Played by Lizzy Caplan) who, to an extent replaces Isla Fisher. She's actually really funny and charming, to say the least. All the characters are exactly as the same as they were in the first one. We have a new villain by the name of Walter Mabry (played by Daniel Radcliffe.) He wants the Horsemen to capture a certain device so he can have access to everyone's details. Daniel Radcliffe surprisingly makes a good villain.

We rate this 3/5 stars (7/10.) The movie is entertaining, action packed and nonstop guessing and thrills all the way through. Why didn't we rate it higher? We thought it didn't deserve any higher. It's an enjoyable flick, just like the first one. Nothing more, nothing less. Go and check it out. It's worth seeing. -Autistic Reviewers.

While the previous film was full of intrigue, mystery, and revelations, this film is a pale comparison to it's prequel. With considerably less action and more talk, the first half of the film manages to bore the audience. As well, this film gives off the feeling of trying too hard to be like the first one that it just falls short.

The acting is fine enough for the Horsemen, as they all reprise their roles. I did like Isla Fisher and her character, but unfortunately she got replaced by Lizzy Caplan, who isn't so bad either. I had a problem with Radcliffe's character. He was too weird, and his background was not very comprehensive. I also found out how short he actually is in this film. In addition, the film introduces Merritt's twin brother, Chase, played by Woody Harrelson. That was another no-no. Though the editing was done well enough between the two characters, the hair on 'Chase' was very obviously a wig which was unnerving. Needless to say, I found that the new characters were not a great addition.

As for the narrative, it kind of continues the story from the first film, but not in as much detail. As well, there are more elements involved in this film that detracts attention away from the main plot. This is what made it messy; with too many things going on the audience doesn't know which to focus on. And with no focus, the narrative just becomes jumbled up.

The effects are cool as usual. I especially liked the scene where they're tossing a card to each other. Visuals and coordination are nicely done there, and managed to engage the audience.

The ending felt a little too deja vu from the first one. As mentioned, it tries too hard to be like its predecessor that it just destroys itself. I'm not saying the film is not enjoyable, but while it isn't totally horrible, there is too much dialogue and not enough action. I'd liked to have seen more tricks, and less new characters who hardly had any foundation.

"Now You See Me 2" rides the wave of its predecessor's success, bringing back the charismatic crew of illusionists known as the Four Horsemen for another round of thrilling heists and magical escapades. With a fresh take on the premise, this sequel dives deeper into the world of magic while introducing new challenges and compelling characters.

The film's ensemble cast, including Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, and Lizzy Caplan, along with the addition of Daniel Radcliffe, brings a lively energy to the screen. Each performer showcases not only their magical talents but also their comedic chops, resulting in several humorous moments amidst the tension. The visuals are once again a standout feature, with impressive tricks and elaborate setups that keep the audience on the edge of their seats.

"Now You See Me 2" does face some challenges. While the complexity of the plot can be intriguing, it sometimes feels overwhelming and convoluted, making it difficult for viewers to fully engage with the story. Certain twists may come across as forced or predictable, detracting from the overall suspense that the film aims to build.

While the film excels in spectacle, it occasionally neglects character development, making it harder for audiences to connect with some of the newer additions to the cast. The first film's charm and camaraderie among the Four Horsemen feel somewhat diluted this time around.

"Now You See Me 2" offers an entertaining blend of magic, humor, and heist thrills that will satisfy fans of the original. While it may stumble in narrative coherence and character depth, the film remains a visually captivating experience that delivers enough fun to make it worth a watch. Just prepare to suspend some disbelief for the best enjoyment!