The Preventionist

3.9(146개의 평가)
실제 범죄
시리즈 완결

In the summer of 2023, reporter Dyan Neary received a tip about a problematic doctor in Pennsylvania. Families were claiming that when they sought medical care for their children, this pediatrician falsely accused them of abuse, and their children were taken away from them. The Preventionist traces this doctor’s decades-long career across multiple states, and explores the rise of a new and powerful kind of specialist, the “child abuse pediatrician” — whose decisions can be incredibly difficult to challenge.

예고편

Trailer

In the summer of 2023, reporter Dyan Neary received a tip about a problematic doctor in Pennsylvania. Families were claiming that when they sought medical care for their children, this pediatrician falsely accused them of abuse, and their children were taken away from them. The Preventionist traces this doctor’s decades-long career across multiple states, and explores the rise of a new and powerful kind of specialist, the “child abuse pediatrician” — whose decisions can be incredibly difficult to challenge. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. To find out about new shows from Serial Productions, and get a look behind the scenes, sign up for our newsletter at nytimes.com/serialnewsletter. Have a story pitch, a tip, or feedback on our shows? Email us at serialshows@nytimes.com

시즌 1

•

3분

Our newest podcast, “The Preventionist” is out now. Search for it wherever you get your podcasts. Serial Productions makes narrative podcasts that have transformed the medium. Sign up for our newsletter at nytimes.com/serialnewsletter to find out about new shows, get behind the scenes stories, and see photos and videos you can’t see on a podcast. To get full access to Serial Productions shows, and to other New York Times podcasts on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, subscribe at nytimes.com/podcasts. Have a story pitch, a tip, or feedback on our shows? Email us at serialshows@nytimes.com "Serial" began in 2014 as a spinoff of the public radio show "This American Life." In 2017, we formed Serial Productions when we launched the podcast “S-Town.” Since then, Serial Productions has produced every season of “Serial” along with shows like “Nice White Parents,” “The Trojan Horse Affair,” “The Coldest Case in Laramie,” “The Retrievals” and more. In 2020, we joined the New York Times Company. Our shows have reached many millions of listeners and have won nearly every major journalism award for audio, including the first-ever Peabody Award given to a podcast.

4.5(74689개의 평가)

뉴스
C-sections are the most frequently performed major surgeries in the world. So why do so many patients feel severe pain during them? Season 2 of the award-winning podcast “The Retrievals” is an investigation into this underreported problem — and the new effort to solve it. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. To find out about new shows from Serial Productions, and get a look behind the scenes, sign up for our newsletter at nytimes.com/serialnewsletter. Have a story pitch, a tip, or feedback on our shows? Email us at serialshows@nytimes.com

4.6(10194개의 평가)

실제 범죄
S-Town is a podcast hosted by Brian Reed from Serial Productions, a New York Times company. The story follows a man named John who despises his Alabama town and decides to do something about it. He asks Brian to investigate the son of a wealthy family who's allegedly been bragging that he got away with murder. But when someone else ends up dead, the search for the truth leads to a nasty feud, a hunt for hidden treasure, and an unearthing of the mysteries of one man's life. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. To find out about new shows from Serial Productions, and get a look behind the scenes, sign up for our newsletter at nytimes.com/serialnewsletter. Have a story pitch, a tip, or feedback on our shows? Email us at serialshows@nytimes.com

4.6(45621개의 평가)

일기
If you want to understand what’s wrong with our public schools, you have to look at what is arguably the most powerful force in shaping them: white parents. A five-part series from the makers of Serial and The New York Times. Hosted by Chana Joffe-Walt. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. To find out about new shows from Serial Productions, and get a look behind the scenes, sign up for our newsletter at nytimes.com/serialnewsletter. Have a story pitch, a tip, or feedback on our shows? Email us at serialshows@nytimes.com

3.9(24620개의 평가)

사회 및 문화
Kim Barker, a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter for The New York Times, revisits an unsolved murder that took place while she was in high school in Laramie, Wyoming, nearly 40 years ago. She confronts the conflicting stories people have told themselves about the crime because of an unexpected development: the arrest of a former Laramie police officer accused in the murder. To get full access to this show, and to other Serial Productions and New York Times podcasts on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, subscribe at nytimes.com/podcasts. To find out about new shows from Serial Productions, and get a look behind the scenes, sign up for our newsletter at nytimes.com/serialnewsletter. Have a story pitch, a tip, or feedback on our shows? Email us at serialshows@nytimes.com

4.0(3481개의 평가)

실제 범죄
From Serial Productions and The New York Times in partnership with ProPublica and Nashville Public Radio, “The Kids of Rutherford County” is reported and hosted by Meribah Knight, a Peabody-award winning reporter based in the South. For over a decade, one Tennessee county arrested and illegally jailed hundreds, maybe thousands, of children. A four-part narrative series reveals how this came to be, the adults responsible for it, and the two lawyers, former juvenile delinquents themselves, who try to do something about it. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. To find out about new shows from Serial Productions, and get a look behind the scenes, sign up for our newsletter at nytimes.com/serialnewsletter. Have a story pitch, a tip, or feedback on our shows? Email us at serialshows@nytimes.com

4.2(2621개의 평가)

실제 범죄

구독 FAQ 보기

3.9

최고 5점

146개의 평가

Important listen

3일 전

RhiRabern

Very well done and worth listening to.
“Think of the Parents”

1일 전

Jyuichi

What is the thesis of this podcast? lVHS has too many false child abuse investigations? That’s a fine thesis but it doesn’t seem to be the point of the podcast. Most of the podcast is not about this. We don’t get a breakdown into these cases. Mark’s paper was only about MCA but the parents discussed mention multiple rib fractures, one off head trauma not a Munchausen allegations. Shaken baby, brittle bone and MCA are all shoved together as “over-diagnosed child abuse” . But Episode 2 isn’t about Lehigh at all, it’s mostly about a single doctor’s history in Florida and how those social workers and judges disliked her. So is the thesis “Dr. Jensen is a bad doctor?” (There is a lot of upset that a doctor had confidence and ego… these traits are praised in male doctors.) From the anecdotes told in episode 2 she seems to be an annoying or arrogant person but is she a bad doctor? This isn’t answered. We dwell on Mark (who is a campaigning politician) and his complaints that allegations are expensive to respond to (so?), that parents are upset to be called abusers (duh) but not the children’s outcomes. Was Dr. Jansen wrong about the Lehigh cases? I don’t know. A Munchausen expert would be helpful in this case. The thought repeated is that because Jansen finds MCA more than other providers she is doing something wrong. We do not discuss the children. Are the children passing a separation test? Do symptoms disappear when removed from the home? We do not discuss the children. This brings us to episode 3 “better safe than sorry”about Amanda. Amanda’s baby was dropped to the floor. Her newborn is suffering; he has a brain bleed and fractures. Amanda’s other children have history of child abuse allegations (against the fathers). What should a doctor do here? I don’t know why NYT is staking the emotional portion of this case on this woman. She is not a convicted child abuser but I don’t know if she is a good parent. Amanda tells her child, who allegedly dropped the baby, that she will call the cops on her and she will end up in jail for pulling another child’s hair. Amanda is hesitant to file to get her son back from foster care. Amanda stopped talking to the reporter after that. I sympathize with Amanda, she has a hard life, but… what is this podcast about? Mark’s report isn’t about cases like hers. Dr. Jensen did not take Amanda’s son away. Yet Amanda gets a full third of the show. What is the thesis of this podcast? The conclusion stated is “Everyone involved in child welfare cases should doubt child abuse pediatricians” “we should require a second opinion”. With what money? Would it be more efficient to require Continuing Education for CAPs? Suddenly we are back to Mark, his controllers office, and his concern that child abuse investigations without slam dunk evidence is a waste of funds. The real conclusion of these three episodes seems to be “think of the parents.” The sad parents speaking at the town hall. Those who are in civil litigation. Amanda telling her children not to snitch. The poor victims of the government conspiracy daring to ask why their kids are suffering. Should more children die like Olivia Gant? It would lower the county budget but is that the society we want?
Could’ve listened longer

4일 전

(m:m)

This was a fascinating and heartbreaking piece of reporting. I appreciate that Amanda shared as much of her story as she did. What impossible calculus she’s had to do. As for reviews claiming bias reporting, I wonder that those reviewers listened to the full series.
Travesty in reporting

3일 전

AnotherAustinRunner

This is another Caliphate, if you’re familiar with that disaster of a podcast. So disappointed in then NY Times. This undermines your credibility. Worse than that, you’re lending credibility to the notion that we shouldn’t believe specialists when they diagnose Munchausen By Proxy or medical child abuse. Why on earth would you automatically believe a parent when they say they didn’t abuse their child? Is this really something you think a parent readily admits? Why would you discount the testimony of a specialist? What on earth do you think they have to gain? This reporting cynically chases a tantalizing story at the cost of endangering the system that seeks to protect children. There’s no excuse for this shoddy reporting.

In the summer of 2023, reporter Dyan Neary received a tip about a problematic doctor in Pennsylvania. Families were claiming that when they sought medical care for their children, this pediatrician falsely accused them of abuse, and their children were taken away from them. The Preventionist traces this doctor’s decades-long career across multiple states, and explores the rise of a new and powerful kind of specialist, the “child abuse pediatrician” — whose decisions can be incredibly difficult to challenge.