From Pine View Farm

Geek Stuff category archive

“History Does Not Repeat Itself, but It Often Rhymes”* 0

Security maven Bruce Schneier looks at the hype and hoopla over AI and hears a rhyme. Here’s a bit of his article:

But even as it offers endless potential, AI is a technology that—like the state—gives others new powers to control our lives and experiences.

We’ve seen this out play before. Social media companies made the same sorts of promises 20 years ago: instant communication enabling individual connection at massive scale. Fast-forward to today, and the technology that was supposed to give individuals power and influence ended up controlling us. Today social media dominates our time and attention, assaults our mental health, and—together with its Big Tech parent companies—captures an unfathomable fraction of our economy, even as it poses risks to our democracy.

_______________

*Mark Twain.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

A competent confidential counselor? At Psychology Today Blogs, psychology professor Hal Shorey warns us that “(s)ystems like ChatGPT do not adequately guard your privacy and are not accountable if they give you bad advice.”

Follow the link for more warnings.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

A willing accomplice? Philadphia’s WPVI reports that scammers are using AI to hype their holiday scams.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

A competent therapist? From Albert Wong, writing at Psychology Today Blogs, we learn that “(a) chatbot designed to prevent eating disorders gave a recovering patient detailed advice to develop one.”

Share

American Stasi 0

At Above the Law, Joe Patrice finds himself somewhat taken aback. A snippet:

The latest installment in Judge Sara Ellis’s seemingly never-ending mission of reading the riot act to the actual riot police, arrived as a 233-page opinion that reads like the tutorial level for a role-reversed Wolfenstein game. Judge Ellis’s account of the Trump administration’s ongoing experiment with turning paramilitary thugs loose on Chicago includes body-cam footage contradicting official narratives, false testimony, and the aforementioned “agent rolled down his window, pointed a handgun out of it, and said ‘bang bang’ followed by something like ‘you’re dead, liberal.’” Agents claimed protesters threw bikes at them (footage showed agents grabbing and throwing the bikes). They said shields had nails in them (footage showed cardboard). They identified “Latin Kings” by their “maroon hoodies” (maroon isn’t a Latin King color, and one person in maroon was an alderman).

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Bait-and-switch frolics.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Mendacious? At the Detroit Free Press, Randy Essex makes a strong case that he caught Elon Musk’s Grok in, if not a lie, a clear case of skewing the facts to support a–er–questionable conclusion.

No excerpt or summary can do his narrative justice. Just go read it and watch the story unfold.

Share

It’s All about the Algorithm . . . 0

. . . but, per Lacey Johnson at Psychology Today Blogs, the algorithm is not your friend.

I would add that not only is it not your friend; it’s their tool for manipulation.

Share

Devolution 0

Share

It’s All about the Algorithm . . . . 0

. . . and Big Tech is ready to go to court to protect its ability to promote engagement send your kids down its rabid holes.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

A source of competent medical advice? Via the Houston Chronicle, Dr. Owais Durrani says beware of online AI quacks

Share

It’s All about the Algorithm . . . 0

. . . and, as Timothy Cook points out at Psychology Today Blogs, the algorithm does not care about the well-being of children–or of anyone else, for that matter.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Bad for developing brains? Pediatrician Ran D. Anbar argues that, in its current state, it likely is. He makes three main points in his article:

  • LLMs do not “understand” anything in the ways humans do, but rather identify statistical patterns.
  • Platforms that display “likes” and view counts tap into adolescent desires for social acceptance and status.
  • Children who spend too much time on AI-driven apps may fail to adequately develop critical brain pathways.

Follow the link for a detailed exploration of each.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Suitable stocking stuffers? Per El Reg

As we head into the holiday season, consumer watchdogs at the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) tested four AI toys and found that, while some are worse than others at veering off their limited guardrails, none of them are particularly safe for impressionable young minds.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Stealing intellectual property? A German court says, “Guilty! Guilty! Guilty!

Share

Virtual Public Nutcases 0

The EFF reports that there’s a move in the Wisconsin state legislature to ban VPNs (Virtual Private Networks), using the excuse that this will somehow protect children.

This is the sort of thing that happens when persons with axes to grind start messing with something that they have no clue about. (Think Trump tariffs, for example.) Here’s a tiny bit from the article:

People have (predictably) turned to VPNs to protect their privacy as they watched age verification mandates proliferate around the world. Instead of taking this as a sign that maybe mass surveillance isn’t popular, lawmakers have decided the real problem is that these privacy tools exist at all and are trying to ban the tools that let people maintain their privacy.

Follow the link detailed information about why this a bad, very bad, extremely stupid idea.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Secure? Why it’s just like leaving your car keys (remember when cars had keys?) in the ignition.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Taking us down a rabbit hole? Paula Fontenelle, writing at Psychology Today Blogs, tells the story of one man’s descent. Here’s a tiny bit (emphasis added):

The conversation (with ChatGPT–ed.) lasted for weeks—thousands of prompts, day and night. “We wrote the equivalent of The Lord of the Rings trilogy,” Allan said. “Three thousand five hundred pages. GPT produced a billion words, and I typed ninety thousand,” he shared.

Eventually, he realized that he’d lost touch with reality. You might be asking: How? Well, here’s the strange twist. He pasted part of the conversation into Gemini, Google’s chatbot, and Gemini said it was all a fabricated fiction. Nothing they had produced would ever work in the real world. So, one chatbot debunked another.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Profits before people frolics:

Meta internally projected late last year that it would earn about 10% of its overall annual revenue – or $16 billion – from running advertising for scams and banned goods, internal company documents show.

Details at the link.

Share

How Stuff Works: the Disinformation Superhighway 0

Rat (typing):  The reason the Fall is called that is because it was a nice autumn day wne Adam and Eve ate the apple and fell from grace.  Goat:  That's not true.  Rat:  Oh, I know, but now that I've posted it on the internet, millions of people with cite is as fact and no one will know what the truth is.  Goat (later, to Pig):  The internet was a mistake.

Click to view the original image.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.