Bryan A. Garner
|
Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges
by
16 editions
—
published
2007
—
|
|
|
HBR Guide to Better Business Writing
19 editions
—
published
2005
—
|
|
|
Garner's Modern American Usage
7 editions
—
published
1998
—
|
|
|
Black's Law Dictionary
148 editions
—
published
1891
—
|
|
|
Legal Writing in Plain English: A Text With Exercises
23 editions
—
published
2001
—
|
|
|
The Winning Brief: 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Courts
11 editions
—
published
1999
—
|
|
|
The Elements of Legal Style
8 editions
—
published
1991
—
|
|
|
Garner's Modern English Usage
|
|
|
The Redbook: A Manual on Legal Style
18 editions
—
published
2002
—
|
|
|
Nino and Me: My Unusual Friendship with Justice Antonin Scalia
—
published
2018
|
|
“In jargon nobody ever does anything, feels anything, or causes anything; nobody has an opinion. Opinions are had; causes result in; factors affect. Everything is reduced to vague abstraction. The writer can even abolish himself, for jargon never sounds as though anybody had written it; it seems simply to come about, as from a machine, and it talks mechanically of things that come about, through some indistinct interaction of forces.” —Robert Waddell, “Formal Prose and Jargon,” in Modern Essays on Writing and Style 84, 89 (Paul C. Wermuth ed., 1964).”
― The Winning Brief: 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Courts
― The Winning Brief: 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Courts
“A mathematician once told me that there are really only four numbers in the world: one, two, three, and many.”
― HBR Guide to Better Business Writing
― HBR Guide to Better Business Writing
“DFW: Isn’t verbosity, the term itself, pejorative? Is this not a loaded question? Verbose is not neutral. BAG: Why is it bad to have extra words in a sentence? DFW: Doesn’t extra, itself, imply . . . It’s very . . . I don’t think verbosity, in terms of using a lot of words, is always a bad thing artistically. In the kind of writing that we’re talking about, there are probably two big dangers. One is that it makes the reader work harder, and that’s never good. The other is that if the reader becomes conscious that she’s having to work harder because you’re being verbose, now she’s apt not only to dislike the piece of writing; she’s apt to draw certain conclusions about you as a person that are unfavorable. So you run the risk of losing kind of both your logical appeal and your ethical appeal.”
― Quack This Way
― Quack This Way
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Bryan to Goodreads.