Mij Woodward's Reviews > The Round House

The Round House by Louise Erdrich
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
5222282
's review

liked it
bookshelves: national-book-2012, hist-fiction

Maybe it's my age (68). Maybe it's a peculiar idiosyncrasy that I am unable to tolerate ANY passages in a novel that seem to be aimed at teaching me something.

I do like to be taught. But in a novel, any teachings have to be cleverly disguised, and just sort of snuck into the plot.

Maybe all that I learned about the Chippewa in North Dakota, and the injustices they and other Native groups face from our country's stupid fractured legal system, and life on the reservation--maybe that learning deserves 4 or 5 stars.

However, I can only give this 3 stars, because of the passages in this novel that felt like I was being taught something.

I only wanted to stay with the storyline, the main plot, and the main characters.

About half way through, I began to sort of skim through the teaching passages, and other passages that did not seem germane to the storyline.

Also, as the mother of four boys, (POSSIBLE SPOILER HERE)--I could not picture my 13-year-old boys acting in the ways that a couple of them did in this novel. Did not seem plausible. But then, our family did not have to face what the family in The Round House had to face, and also, we did not live on a reservation.

On the plus side--I very much enjoyed the story, and will not be forgetting it and some of the characters any time soon.
35 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Round House.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
October 15, 2012 – Shelved
October 15, 2012 – Shelved as: national-book-2012
October 15, 2012 – Finished Reading
December 15, 2012 – Shelved as: hist-fiction

Comments Showing 1-13 of 13 (13 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Ann (new)

Ann Naw, I am same age and I gave it 5 stars and also mother of boys. It is a good book.


message 2: by Mij (new) - rated it 3 stars

Mij Woodward Ann wrote: "Naw, I am same age and I gave it 5 stars and also mother of boys. It is a good book."

Ann--it's all chemistry. Or, the old pot-of-gold thing--what is someone's gold is another's trash. Or, in this case, not trash at all, but 3 stars for me, 5 stars for you. To me, 3 stars means it is a good book, so you and I agree about that!


message 3: by Bex (new) - rated it 3 stars

Bex Mij I agree with you in regards to "being taught." The information was interesting, but I felt it was poorly delivered. The narrative switched from an interesting mystery/thriller plot to a curious high school social studies lecture that proved very distracting.


message 4: by Mij (new) - rated it 3 stars

Mij Woodward Rebecca wrote: "Mij I agree with you in regards to "being taught." The information was interesting, but I felt it was poorly delivered. The narrative switched from an interesting mystery/thriller plot to a curious..."

Rebecca--very succinctly put!


message 5: by Ann (new)

Ann so, succinctly interested me. but how did Rebecca put it?


message 6: by Mij (new) - rated it 3 stars

Mij Woodward Ann wrote: "so, succinctly interested me. but how did Rebecca put it?"

Well, I have a tendency to say things in sort of a roundabout or at least a more longwinded way, such as how I tried to explain that I do not like teaching-parts in a fictional work, so the phrases "poorly delivered" and "distracting" felt more succinct to me. And I betcha' someone could re-phrase what I just tried to say here much more succinctly!


Brittany B. I don't understand what you gals mean when you discuss not wanting to learn while reading... Do you mean that you prefer a straight forward mystery, and wished the author had left out the descriptive passages concerning culture, nuances, and beliefs of these native Americans in the story? Or did you feel it was preachy?
I'm so curious. Consider I'm at the half-way point of the book. I find that it is dragging, after a nice start. Perhaps the "teaching" is to come... :)


message 8: by Mij (new) - rated it 3 stars

Mij Woodward Brittany B. wrote: "I don't understand what you gals mean when you discuss not wanting to learn while reading... Do you mean that you prefer a straight forward mystery, and wished the author had left out the descript..."

My favorite form of fiction is historical fiction. I love learning about other cultures, other places, other times. Some novels do this without it being that obvious--details just appear as part of the scene. Other novels seem bent on teaching the reader something, and so the learning parts feel a little out of place or "teachy" (is that a word?) or "preachy." My antenna goes up when I sense that I am being "told" something, rather than being shown something.

When you finish the novel, get back with me, and I can then be more specific as to the parts in Round House that felt a little teachy to me.


message 9: by Cheryl (new)

Cheryl I use the word 'didactic' in my reviews of books that are 'teachy.' Subtle is better, imo.


Brittany B. I understand. Historical fiction is also my favorite genre. I understand the being told vs being shown, as well. Thank you for explaining. I worried last night that my question may not have been worded properly. I am pleased to see you understood my curiosity. I love "teachy" (the word) and I might have to use it. :)
I'm about 85% finished. I'll check in again when I finish.


Brittany B. I definitely got to a preachy part... Forget teachy, it's downright preachy... :)


Virginia I'm w/Ann, same age, & Mom of 3 boys. I think maybe some do not like this taken cold: i came to it as a long-time reader of Erdrich novels. They build on each other, creating a many-branched tome, of which this is one story. Knowing Erdrich, I was not fooled by the crime-novel beginning, & was in it for the long haul.


Amanda  Up North I read this about a year ago, and gave it three stars, as well. I'm with you - three stars means "I liked it." Not a bad book, but not out of this world for me either.
I get what you mean about the teachy/preachy thing. I love to learn from books, but novels are for enjoying, and if I learn along the way, that's added bonus. Historical fiction have always been my favorite for that reason.
A year after reading this, I will say that there are scenes from this book that are still vivid in my memory, which is not all that common. I don't remember the boy behavior so much.. but I have four boys, too (and one girl), and I have found myself feeling similarly - disagreeing with how teenage boys are depicted.
If memory serves me well at all, I think I had read Montana 1948 and Ordinary Grace close to the same time as this one, and they were all narrated by coming-of-age boys, and I didn't agree with the way their behavior was stereotyped.
It looks like you read this one quite a while ago.. I just stumbled upon your review!


back to top