Steelwhisper's Reviews > Soulless

Soulless by T. Baggins
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
7962895
Clever! And now I need some time before I review this.

ETA: Time to review, which I'll start off saying I received this copy from the author, as she wanted my honest opinion.

4.75* which easily rounds up to 5*

I'll put the niggles first, there were two minor anachronisms, which my inner editor isn't able to ignore entirely. They are the reason why it's just 4.75 and not 5 out of the box:

The monicker "kerosene" was coined ~1850 with its industrial invention and mass usage, 70 years later. The term "alpha" for anything but the more literal "the beginning", particularly for use in ranking, be it humans or animals, began being used only in the mid-20th-century.

I'm certain a specialist editor for historical content would have caught these. Else the book was clean, I found no typos or homonyms or other problems of the technical side and the author's prose, like so far every time, was easy, fluid, engaging and elegant. It's so nice being able to say this, because it's a relief and very rare.

Sooooo, with that to the meat! Be aware from here onwards there are MINOR SPOILERS (I spoiler-tagged the big one)!

~~~spoilershed~~~

I was enormously impressed by this book, and not a little envious.

First important thing: THIS IS NOT AT ALL FLUFFY! No glittering, virginal vampires here like in Stefenie Meyer's books, no eternal cutesy teens or twens as in Buffy. Emphatically NO! You get bitter, harsh, sadistic monsters, and even the "good" ones have no conscience and would kill at the drop of a hat. You get fanatics to whom a human life is nothing, and Eros is back in the gore as well! This is as close to the best of the original tales as please. To me it felt like a cross of Dracula and Interview with the Vampire

The second thing a reader will have to know is that Nicholas is an eunuch, and one so brilliantly written that the sex scenes, especially the early ones, sent me for a while to the bunk, so to speak. They sizzled, and that's not something I say easily, as those who regularly read my reviews will know! T. Baggins has the gift of writing awkward, first-time, painful or chagrined sex with such a blatantly discomfort-hungry stare that it sets me on fire, and as I happen to know others like me, who enjoy torturous moments.

The torture, ah, the torture! T. Baggins knows how to write this, and it's darker than dark. I started drooling the moment I realised she would be making use of the indestructible paintoy, who would perforce put himself back together regardless how much he was hurt. And gloriously it was written realistically, quite unlike Bloodraven, which was both unemotional, telling more than showing, giving no insight into what was happening. Not so here! Some of the images the author conjures here were... wonderfully depraved and exciting! Horrific in the classic sense, taking me effortlessly back to the serious frissons I suffered as a child when watching horror movies too much for me.

The people were no less compelling. Lovely Nicholas, so broken, so devoid of hope, somber Bancroft, touching in his quest for his soul, yet icy cold else at times. Martha, who I loved dearly the first time I met her, a female so well-written as to not so easily be found in m/m. In fact all the females in this book where very real, written with such compassion, knowledge and goodwill, that they make this a completely different reading experience from the majority of m/m romances: wholesome, not angry at women, not misogynic. And Sebastian, well, Sebastian was frightening. Just as I would expect the villain to be. Frightening.

The tale itself is complicated, so a reader starting on this journey here should not expect to get the usual shallow romance fare. Don't skip what you may initially just think is exposition or background info! It's important you take it as what it is: a story taking place in several different eras! If you aren't willing to engage with a story which takes you through a few real twists and turns, then this book may not be for you. I was overjoyed to be intellectually challenged in an m/m romance, and that without it being pretentious.

Lastly, the spin on vampires here is not unheard of, but it comes together in a totally own and nicely working manner, which even explains some esoteric lore and conventions about the species. The author creates her own world of vampires, goes about it in a really clever way, especially how she juxtaposes it with Nicholas utter faith in science, and the showdown had me on the edge of my chair. For those in doubt, there's even a HEA/HFN, though I could also have done with a more bittersweet ending ((view spoiler))

This was a wonderful book to read: clever, twisted, horrific, deeply erotic, laden with torture of the mind and the body (though not drowned with it, a mistake so many authors make!) and a eunuch, damn, a wonderfully written eunuch!

Recced for anyone with my predilections! Not for the feeble of heart. This packs a real punch.
33 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Soulless.
Sign In »

Quotes Steelwhisper Liked

T. Baggins
“In his early days at University, he'd been too green to realize winning debates, even private ones, would lose him friends.”
T. Baggins, Soulless


Reading Progress

August 1, 2013 – Started Reading
August 1, 2013 – Shelved
August 2, 2013 –
1.0% "Damn, this had better be good. I want to 4 or 5* a book again!"
August 13, 2013 –
2.0% "Bliss..."
August 13, 2013 –
3.0% "Mr. Robinson, I presume?

;)"
August 13, 2013 –
4.0% "Slight oops:


alpha (n.) ...Sense of "first in a sequence" is from 1620s. Alpha male was in use by c.1960 among scientists studying animals; applied to humans in society from c.1992."
August 13, 2013 –
5.0% "Holy effing MOLY!!! O.o"
August 13, 2013 –
6.0% ""usually I never drink wine"
How bloody classic :)"
August 13, 2013 –
7.0% "Quite priceless!"
August 13, 2013 – Shelved as: georgian-era
August 13, 2013 – Shelved as: horror
August 13, 2013 – Shelved as: wtf-did-i-just-read
August 13, 2013 –
12.0% "Priapism, my arse..."
August 13, 2013 –
13.0% "Ooooh bloody fff.... *starts slobbering*"
August 13, 2013 –
15.0% "Kerosene is 70 years later."
August 13, 2013 –
17.0% "Awww... not Martha!"
August 13, 2013 –
20.0% "Nicky... ;)"
August 13, 2013 –
31.0% "Hungry sucker."
August 13, 2013 –
34.0% "I'm beginning to like Ban."
August 13, 2013 –
36.0% "Lots of... err... broken eggs."
August 13, 2013 –
38.0% ""What if I shit?" Glorious!"
August 13, 2013 –
40.0% "How fortunate, a rig"
August 13, 2013 –
42.0% "Lovely worldbuilding!"
August 13, 2013 –
46.0% "Bloody hell!"
August 13, 2013 –
47.0% "*This* is how you describe such a thing! Much better than Bloodraven."
August 13, 2013 –
60.0% "At least as rich as Anne Rice."
August 14, 2013 –
77.0% "O.o"
August 14, 2013 –
83.0% "Love the allusions to rethorics!"
August 14, 2013 –
84.0% "Eeeeeeeeeeeeeek!"
August 14, 2013 –
94.0% "Ewwwwwwwwww!"
August 14, 2013 – Shelved as: religious
August 14, 2013 – Shelved as: eunuchs
August 14, 2013 – Finished Reading
October 21, 2013 – Shelved as: historical-romance
October 21, 2013 – Shelved as: m-m
October 21, 2013 – Shelved as: paranormal
October 21, 2013 – Shelved as: favorites
October 23, 2013 – Shelved as: erotic-romance
July 17, 2014 – Shelved as: 5-brilliant

Comments Showing 1-23 of 23 (23 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Steelwhisper (last edited Aug 13, 2013 09:11AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Steelwhisper Yeah, but the name Kerosene is 1850 and not 1790. I don't mind, the book is absolutely stunning me, much like her others, and will be 4-5*. But I wished she had some editor. Reid is brilliant.


Lisa Henry Great review. I loved a lot of things about this one as well.

And good work picking up on Kerosine!


Steelwhisper Heh, I can't switch my inner editor off, I'm afraid. ;) Thanks!


Lisa Henry Steelwhisper wrote: "Heh, I can't switch my inner editor off, I'm afraid. ;) Thanks!"

I find the only way to switch my inner editor off is to drown that bitch with alcohol. :)


Steelwhisper Another sufferer then ;)

But it's simply great when the author still makes you forget the niggles, and Baggins does that for me.


Lisa Henry Steelwhisper wrote: "Another sufferer then ;)

But it's simply great when the author still makes you forget the niggles, and Baggins does that for me."


Oh, for sure. I loved this one! I didn't know whether to cry or cheer -- it's been so long since a vampire was grotesque and horrifying! I've missed it so much!


Steelwhisper I am a "twue fan" of the classic Bram Stoker-style Dracula kind of vampire. Tragic, steeped in lore, complicated, erotic at times, nasty at times. I went along with modern vampires as far as Anne Rice's Interview with a Vampire. Movie-wise Dracula a Love Story and Carpenter's Vampires.

All the fluffy, glittery or cutesy TV-Vampires and Twilight ones, eewww.

So yes, both Ban and Sebastian were wonderful. And some of the torture scenes really got my blood flowing ;) I couldn't stop reading once the going got difficult :)


Lisa Henry Yeah, me too. They lost me when they started to sparkle. I am quite fond of some of the older True Blood eps though, and of course Buffy which was fun enough while still having some scary moment!

I couldn't stop reading this one either. I had to see how it all worked out. Very dark, and very cool.


message 9: by Carole-Ann (new) - added it

Carole-Ann Thank you for recommending this! I've already bought this (for a reason I can't remember!) :) but I do like all the possibilities the blurb threw out :)


message 10: by Carole-Ann (new) - added it

Carole-Ann OK: just had a thought: perhaps I'm as depraved as I thought I was :)


Steelwhisper LOL! There, there! ;)


message 12: by Carole-Ann (new) - added it

Carole-Ann LOL :)


message 13: by Yblees (new) - added it

Yblees Wow. 5 stars AND vampires. Must add!


Steelwhisper Heh, careful, these are absolutely not fluffy! ;) Not even a bit!


message 15: by Yblees (new) - added it

Yblees Ha. No sparkly vampires for me.
"Interview With The Vampire" was THE vampire series for my generation. And Kim Newman's "Anno Dracula" was a favourite of mine.
To this day, I'm suspicious of goody-goody vampire characters.


Steelwhisper Oh, then it should work just fine for you :D


Kelly (Maybedog) I hated the end but it wasn't very predictable or common so that's good. I recognize the literary merit, I just hated it.

But other than that, I loved the book. Thanks so much for recommending it.


Steelwhisper Yes, I think several people stated already that the "hope for it" should have been enough. Just like with that story "Prisoner" from LHNB this year.

But then so many romance readers clamour for HEAs...


Kelly (Maybedog) Like me...


Kynthos-the-Archer (Kyn) Love you review Steel. It's very enlightening. And YES that virginal eunuch sex was scorching. It was so erotically written. Beautiful!

Books like this intimidates me sometimes because I knew it meant I would not be able to refrain from writing a lengthy review to express my views - very exhausting :p

There are actually a couple of high profile good books I've avoided touching just yet until I am all ready to perform such a feat again. LOL. I am a silly one.


Angelica Great review! I intend to use this one for a challenge. I just hope not to end up running for the hills :-)


Steelwhisper Angelica wrote: "Great review! I intend to use this one for a challenge. I just hope not to end up running for the hills :-)"

I don't know about your sensibilities, but things can be skim-read ;)


Angelica No skimming for me. What an awesome story, and I'm not done yet.


back to top