Paul Bryant's Reviews > Oliver Twist
Oliver Twist
by
by
Oliver Twist THE BOOK is crap and has NO songs in it, I couldn't believe it. So I googled and get this, it turns out they put those in the movie and Dickens had nothing to do with it! But since they were the best bit of the film, you can understand my horror and bereft sense of disappointment when I finally came to pick up the book.
How could Dickens NOT have thought of having little Oliver sing Where Is Love when chucked into the cellar or Who Will Buy This Loverly Morning when he wakes up in his posh house...I mean yeah he was supposed to be good wasn't he? And please note the edition I read was not a Readers Digest Condensed Edition. When you DON'T have Fagin capering about warbling "In this life one thing counts/ In the bank, large amounts/I'm afraid these don't grow on trees/You got to pick a pocket or two" with that pederastic twinkle in his eyes as he surveys his small boys then alas I'm sorry to say that what you're left with is a bit of an antisemitic caricature lashed to a morality tale whose immoral moral appears to be that rich is good, poor is bad, and you better get yourself a deus ex machina in the form of a very unlikely sugardaddy to magic you out of the poorhouse or the rats will eat your bollocks, your bones will turn to dust and be blown away and no one will ever hire cute kids to pretend to be you on stage or screen and melt our hearts and win Oscars and Tonys. Which I think we all knew.
How could Dickens NOT have thought of having little Oliver sing Where Is Love when chucked into the cellar or Who Will Buy This Loverly Morning when he wakes up in his posh house...I mean yeah he was supposed to be good wasn't he? And please note the edition I read was not a Readers Digest Condensed Edition. When you DON'T have Fagin capering about warbling "In this life one thing counts/ In the bank, large amounts/I'm afraid these don't grow on trees/You got to pick a pocket or two" with that pederastic twinkle in his eyes as he surveys his small boys then alas I'm sorry to say that what you're left with is a bit of an antisemitic caricature lashed to a morality tale whose immoral moral appears to be that rich is good, poor is bad, and you better get yourself a deus ex machina in the form of a very unlikely sugardaddy to magic you out of the poorhouse or the rats will eat your bollocks, your bones will turn to dust and be blown away and no one will ever hire cute kids to pretend to be you on stage or screen and melt our hearts and win Oscars and Tonys. Which I think we all knew.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Oliver Twist.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-50 of 347 (347 new)
Oh, but there's that one part with the evil orphanage lady and the beadle that makes the whole book worth it.
It is again brought home to me that our human family is gifted by its diversity. I gave the book 4 stars. Personally, I have never been rich or poor and have lived a comfortable American life. Dickens, with this book and Great Expectations allowed me to have an insight into the lives of those in 19th century London and helped me feel grateful for the comforts I have enjoyed. I can only assUme he wrote some truth...mgc
I've read a few of his works and I am currently reading David Copperfield. I'm about 70% complete and will post my review in a few days. Bleak House is on my list, but it will wait till later this year. My next book is planned to be the Journals of Lewis and Clark.....mgc
Well, it's been many years since I read it, and I didn't see the movie. But, my memory of Oliver Twist was very enjoyable. I do have it on my "re-reads" list and maybe I'll pick up the movie too.
Ok, so maybe I won't reread this one. Marvellous music- but it's 'Who will buy this wonderful morning?' I used to know it by heart. Couldn't hit the high notes, but loved that song! (Wouldn't it be loverly is My Fair Lady. :-)
What you do is transpose it to a lower key. Then you can hit the high notes. I think Who Will Buy This Loverly Morning is in Oliver. And if I remember right Nancy has a very poignant number called I'm Getting Murdered in the Morning. But I could be wrong.
Michael G. wrote: "It is again brought home to me that our human family is gifted by its diversity. I gave the book 4 stars. Personally, I have never been rich or poor and have lived a comfortable American life. D..."
I wholeheartedly agree with you Michael. That was very well put!
I wholeheartedly agree with you Michael. That was very well put!
I've been called an idiot numerous times on this site, but never by someone who gave both King Lear and Macbeth two stars, without condescending to review either one.
Anyway, welcome to the club. We've got t-shirts.
Anyway, welcome to the club. We've got t-shirts.
Do you think I should explain that this review is satirical? Maybe it's just too subtle. Doesn't seem subtle to me but I could be wrong.
She's new here. Give her a grace period until she picks up on the generally friendly and satirical mood on the site and she'll feel silly soon enough.
Despite the fact that it's obviously satire, and that Paul's rating is obviously a reflection of his own personal dislike of the novel? Really?
I see that my sense of humour is not completely shared by everyone! It has got me into trouble several times in my life, it is true. Here's another not entirely serious Dickens review by me just so you can check where my true feelings lie, should you be so interested - this one I rate 5 stars....
Bleak House!
http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
Bleak House!
http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
I just found out FROM ANOTHER REVIEW that this wasn't serious. I don't get it. There was I was thinking this is SO true. Dickens needs better songs and -
You should review Pamela: Or, Virtue Rewarded or Clarissa, or the History of a Young Lady using this humorous method. Wouldn't it be loverly!
yeah good call Richard but like would that mean I have to read them like wow have you seen how long they are is there a graphic version there should be a porn version of Clarissa and Pamela maybe together in the same movie lol
Yes, I have both. Clarissa (in the unabridged version) is what my friend Shovelmonkey1 would call a kitten-squisher. Presumably that means that if you drop the book accidentally and a small feline is directly in its path, well... instant kitty-pancake.
Well here I am again. I too, thought the review was serious, but rather than think anyone an idiot, I just thought it was a difference of opinion. You know what THEY say....an opinion is like a nose, most everyone has one.....mgc
Sean wrote: "Calling someone an idiot is not the culture of goodreads."
Yeah, Paul. And you didn't even say anything bad about HP in this review. Fair crack of the sav, Jasmine.
Yeah, Paul. And you didn't even say anything bad about HP in this review. Fair crack of the sav, Jasmine.
I've just had an idea Paul. You didn't invent Jasmine, did you? You weren't trying the old every insult gets a bunch of votes were you?
notgettingenough wrote: "I've just had an idea Paul. You didn't invent Jasmine, did you? You weren't trying the old every insult gets a bunch of votes were you?"
Damn! It worked!
Well Paul, you won't sucker me that easily next time.
Damn! It worked!
Well Paul, you won't sucker me that easily next time.
Oi, Paul, better stop getting yourself into trouble with serious readers of Dickens...tssk tssk, you naughty man you...
Well. I don't know. Perhaps we are misunderstanding Jasmine altogether. Perhaps Jasmine's point is that Paul is being rude to the musical and how dare he and he is an idiot. Maybe she thinks Dickens in the original sucks.
notgettingenough wrote: "I've just had an idea Paul. You didn't invent Jasmine, did you? You weren't trying the old every insult gets a bunch of votes were you?"
Ok, I also had that thought, but you were in before me...
Ok, I also had that thought, but you were in before me...
Outed! Paul in the week...Jasmine at the weekends. So now I have a true multiple personality disorder. In addition to the guy who wrote the above review and the Frankenstein and Gullivers travels ones, who I seem to have no control over - what will he review next? - now there's Jasmine. I have no memory of calling myself an idiot, but I'm not saying I've never done that, just rarely in print and in a female tone of voice. But what i can remember is this very charming young man who I met earlier this ---- gzzzrt! Recording ends.
Okay....let's all just sit back and listen to Pink Floyd on Dark Side of the Moon and relax. Drink whatever...smoke whatever...or swallow whatever makes you happy.....mgc
Michael G. wrote: "Okay....let's all just sit back and listen to Pink Floyd on Dark Side of the Moon and relax. Drink whatever...smoke whatever...or swallow whatever makes you happy.....mgc"
I'm drinking to that one right now, amen!
I'm drinking to that one right now, amen!
I'm brand brand new...and I while I enjoy satire to some degree i don't get dry humor and this seemed a bit dry to me.
i'm glad i read the comments lol! Side note,I definateley don't find satire amusing enough to enjoy Pride and Predjudice. Or maybe i could just care less about them and their fancypants lives.
Your review was much more amusing.
i'm glad i read the comments lol! Side note,I definateley don't find satire amusing enough to enjoy Pride and Predjudice. Or maybe i could just care less about them and their fancypants lives.
Your review was much more amusing.
you could try Pride & Prejudice with Zombies. Dickens could do with a zombie mashup I think, might boost the sales. A Tale of Two Zombies... Our Mutual Zombie. Something like that.
Nah...I don't think so...I actually debated about it when a book club was reading it. As a family show kind of person I pondered the gore..then stopped and thought if its basically the same book with zombies I still can't believe it will possibly make me like the characters any more. Plus i just prefer original stories.Thanks though!
without Got to Pick a Pocket or Two? or Who will Buy this Luvverly Morning?
I don't think so!
Mia, I confess, this is one of my very silly reviews!
I don't think so!
Mia, I confess, this is one of my very silly reviews!
I think you should have made the gentle jump first to Fooled, Gloriously Fooled before investing in the book, Paul/Jasmine/evil once-dead twin. This might have ameliorated your sense of inevitable let-down.
"Might I have some more, please?"
"MORE!?"