Hux's Reviews > Concrete

Concrete by Thomas Bernhard
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
130057849
's review

it was ok

Well, I tried.

After having read The Loser and being less than impressed, I chose to wait before going back into the world of Thomas Berhard. Unfortunately, I essentially had the same experience again, his bland prose presented as a wall of text representing the mundane rambling thoughts of a man ranting about the mediocre trivialities of life. The interesting thing about Bernhard is that he has a style which suggests stream-of-consciousness but never actually is. His prose is very prosaic, possessing no meaningful flourishes, no Proustian beauty, not even the staggered scattergun stream of thoughts I tend to dislike and which one associates with this kind of writing; but instead he produces a very standard, almost perfunctory, level of writing and grammar. It's somewhat bewildering that he has such an impressive reputation when the writing is, for all intents and purposes, no more creative than what you'd expect from an accountant who works at Dixons. It isn't challenging, it isn't difficult, it's just very basic. 

PAGE 29 - "I believed fervently that I needed my sister in order to be able to start my work on Mendelssohn Bartholdy. And then, when she was there, I knew that I didn't need her, that I could start work only if she wasn't there. But now she's gone and I'm really unable to start. At first it was because she was there, and now it's because she isn't."

PAGE 50 - "We must commit ourselves one hundred per cent to everything we do, my father always said. He said it to everybody - to my mother, to my sisters, to me. If we don't commit ourselves one hundred per cent we fail even before we've begun. But what is one hundred per cent in this case? Haven't I prepared for this work one hundred per cent?  

PAGE 60 - "How long it is since I last took these cases out of the chest! I said to myself. Far too long. In fact the cases were dusty, even though they had been in the chest ever since my last trip, that is my last trip to Palma."

PAGE 124 "At two o' clock in the afternoon, when the car came to collect me, it was still eleven degrees below zero in Peiskam, but on my arrival in Palma, where I am writing these notes, the thermometer showed eighteen degrees above."

Does any of the above strike you as difficult? Not really. And yet Bernhard has this reputation as a writer above the commonplace herd, a writer of difficult prose and challenging works. But why? It doesn't make sense. Well, I've come to the conclusion that it's for the same reason that Jon Fosse also gets endlessly praised. Because they both engage in what I like to call "Manic Monologue." It essentially involves being endlessly repetitive until you feel dizzy with swirling madness. While Fosse will literally just repeat sentences OVER AND OVER again to manufacture this dire sense of being inside a man's anxious mind, Berhard uses a slightly different yet equally irksome approach. Bernhard will write standard, uninteresting (non-repetitive) prose, but will return to the same handful of themes again and again. So in this book, for example, the narrator, Rudolf, talks about his sister, then a few pages later talks about the book he's working on about Bartholdy, then a few pages later talks about going to Palma, then a few pages later talks about his sister again, then a few pages later talks about Bartholdy again, and so on, and so forth. It's slightly less deranging than Fosse but it's ultimately the same technique -- just cover the same ground relentlessly ad nauseam until you're so befuddled and mesmerised that you completely forget that what you're reading is actually... not very interesting.

Apparently, this is great literature to many of you. To me, it's time wasted. Aside from the fact that I don't believe this is actually how people think (even when manic) -- the lack of personal context or abstract thinking, the lack of visuals or incoherent notions incapable of being turned into expressions of thought -- there is also the fact that it's just not very fun to read. Where is my reward for enduring this false, slightly self-congratulatory style? 

I once heard someone say that Berhard doesn't have chapters because life doesn't have chapters. To which I would respond, it's a book, dear, not life.

So yeah, this isn't for me. 
28 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Concrete.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 2, 2024 – Started Reading
November 2, 2024 – Shelved
November 3, 2024 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Peter (new)

Peter Hux, told you so. I don’t get Bernhard either.


MichuPichu don't start with the hardest one, try Wittgenstein's nephew and decide afterwards if it something for you, concrete and the loser are the two hardest / worst ones


message 3: by Luna (new) - added it

Luna If it’s not for you, it’s not for you. I’ve loved everything of his that I’ve read. Perhaps I get him.


message 4: by Hux (new) - rated it 2 stars

Hux MichuPichu wrote: "don't start with the hardest one, try Wittgenstein's nephew and decide afterwards if it something for you, concrete and the loser are the two hardest / worst ones"

Really? Doesn't the style stay the same though? For me that was the bigger issue.

But I'll give Wittgenstein's Nephew a try at a later date (much later).


message 5: by Hux (new) - rated it 2 stars

Hux Peter wrote: "Hux, told you so. I don’t get Bernhard either."

I was genuinely surprised how he could take average and grammatical standard prose but still make it feel like stream-of-consciousness.

Maybe that's the appeal.


message 6: by Cody (new)

Cody I’ve tried. Three times. I don’t like it. I get it, I’m just not impressed by his very obvious stylistic devices/tricks. Literature of Anal-Retentiveness.

It’s no sin to say it’s not for you. I’ll go one step further…


message 7: by Hux (new) - rated it 2 stars

Hux Cody wrote: "I’ve tried. Three times. I don’t like it. I get it, I’m just not impressed by his very obvious stylistic devices/tricks. Literature of Anal-Retentiveness.

It’s no sin to say it’s not for you. I’l..."


Being told "you didn't get it" is all the proof I need that I did.


message 8: by Jordan (new) - added it

Jordan I don’t know why I like Bernhard, but I understand when people don’t. As far as “getting him” perhaps I’m the dumbass (likely) but his books don’t seem that deep or challenging- beyond the onslaught of no paragraphs or chapters. He’s not for everyone, that’s for sure. And I can’t effectively explain why but from the first time I picked up The Loser I was hooked.


message 9: by Hux (last edited Nov 03, 2024 01:29PM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Hux Jordan wrote: "but his books don’t seem that deep or challenging..."

They're not remotely deep or challenging. Which is why I'm perplexed by his reputation for being deep and challenging. Krasnahorkai uses walls of text but his writing is poetic, moving, complex, weird, involves dead whales...

Bernhard simply whined about his sister in prosaic language.

Each to their own. And I will probably give him another shot at some point.


Furciferous Quaintrelle Bex I've never read anything by him, and this review has disabused me of any notions I may previously had about checking him out. Those quoted sections sound like he's being paid by the word and therefore determined to wring every last cent out of the publisher responsible for setting him live to the poor, unassuming reading public. If anything about his work is difficult, it's probably the ability of the reader to find enough wherewithal to power on through such meandering banality. That there are so many of these "sacred cows" of the literary world, for whom success seems to have been bestowed on them for reasons obviously other than the actual writing, I have to wonder if there's some kind of author-centric Epstein island or a literary version of the Diddy parties, where the authors have engaged in illegal, immoral and illicit behaviours, and someone has it all on video, using it as collateral whilst they help propel the aforementioned authors into stratospheric levels of fame and fortune, regardless of the actual quality of their work.

(I'm pretty sure Stephen King would be on those imaginary fly-lists too...might explain all of his mentally ill tweets and deranged outbursts anytime anyone even mentions the name Trump in his vicinity. I don't even want to know what skeletons that demented loon has in his closet!)


message 11: by Rita (new) - rated it 5 stars

Rita I really liked this book and thought it was very funny. It does not bother me that other people don't like it, though.


Furciferous Quaintrelle Bex Rita wrote: "I really liked this book and thought it was very funny. It does not bother me that other people don't like it, though."

Hey, if you liked it that's a good thing. It's hard enough to find a new author or genre that we can really get into sometimes. And what's good for one is not necessarily right for everyone else. I guess we're just really lucky that there are as many books as there are out there in the world and the only thing we have to worry about it is whether or not we'll get around to reading all the ones we want to, in our lifetime.


message 13: by Hux (new) - rated it 2 stars

Hux Rita wrote: "I really liked this book and thought it was very funny. It does not bother me that other people don't like it, though."

People will always like different things. What I hate is being told that I didn't get it. Such an idiotic concept.


message 14: by Rita (new) - rated it 5 stars

Rita It’s certainly true that we all like different things, and we’re all readers who keep reading, we’re curious and want to find out if a book / a writer is for us. That’s a good thing! It’s always interesting to hear what people have to say about books, it gives me new insight and new perspectives. I’m no expert on Bernhard, but I do feel he has a distinctive style. And if I remember correctly, the style has been like this in all the books I’ve read by him (but I may be wrong, since my memory isn’t all that good). So if this book was a pain to read and did not feel very interesting, if the style was a major turn-off, I think this would be the case for most of his books. I think you got it.


back to top