Jennie's Reviews > Empire of the Summer Moon

Empire of the Summer Moon by S.C. Gwynne
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
271326
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: american-history

This book is not about Quanah Parker, his mother, or the Comanche. It's really about How the White Man Conquered the Savage, Primitive, Warmongering Barbarians.

My complaints about this book are many, but I'll try to keep it simple.

Mainly, it's because a "history" written in 2010 contains things like this:

There were no witnesses to this great coming together of Stone Age hunters and horses, nothing to record what happened when they met, or what there was in the soul of the Comanche that understood the horse so much better than everyone else did. Whatever it was, whatever sort of accidental brilliance, whatever the particular, subliminal bond between warrior and horse, it must have thrilled these dark-skinned pariahs from the Wind River country.

Throughout the book, "Indians" are described as savage, primitive, and "low-barbarian." Oh - and Indian.

I found it disingenuous of Gwynne to describe in detail the massacre of Cynthia Ann Parker's family and her capture, then acknowledge his description as "needlessly bloody." He describes most of the Comanche raids in those "needlessly bloody" details, including what seems like every rape, scalping, and disembowelment, but white men's raids on "Indian" villages (the Sand Creek Massacre being the one notable exception) get a brief tally of this many killed/this many captured.

Gwynne's writing style is just annoying, filled with "What happened next was one of the greatest/worst/most...." or "No one knows why...." This isn't a story being told around a cowboy campfire. Give me some facts and let me decide, thank you very much.

Then there's this description of Quanah:

He was also strikingly handsome: fully dark-skinned Comanche but with a classical, straight northern European nose, high cheekbones, and piercing light gray eyes that were as luminous and transparent as his mother's. He somehow looked completely Indian without looking Asiatic, and could have served as a model of how white people thought a noble savage ought to look....

"Indian" voices appear once in a while, as if Gwynne suddenly remembered the part that comes after the colon in the book title. Most of this book is told in a very, very strongly white voice.

I'll leave you with this, perhaps the "best" quote from this book, and then I'm going to quietly toss it in the Goodwill pile, after which I will dance the dance of joy that I never have to look at this again:

...Rachel became entirely Comanche. She shed her pioneer clothing for Indian buckskins, and, though she does not comment on it, would have been as filthy and bug-ridden as any of the Comanches, who were notable even among Indians for their lack of hygiene.

So there you go. Enjoy.
71 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Empire of the Summer Moon.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 1, 2013 – Started Reading
October 1, 2013 – Shelved as: to-read
October 1, 2013 – Shelved
October 1, 2013 – Shelved as: to-read-non-fiction
October 9, 2013 – Shelved as: american-history
October 9, 2013 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-12 of 12 (12 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Min (new)

Min Wow. Thanks for taking a hit for the team. I'l steer well away from that one.


Jennie Always glad to help my friends! :-)


Theresa Anderson Yes! Gwynne downplays the expansion of southern slavery, acts of aggression, war and policies of extermination while repeatedly using derogatory terms such as primitive and sedentary to describe similar actions by Comanche. The disparate methods of attribution contributes to many describing this book as having racist undertones.


message 4: by Ric (new)

Ric Thanks, folks, I will not buy or borrow this book.


MarilynLovesNature Very helpful info. It would be upsetting for me to read it. Maybe you should throw it in the garbage instead of giving it to Goodwill, to save others from being misinformed.


Jennie Tempting, but it went to Goodwill. I think I've only actually thrown two books into the recycle bin rather than inflict them any further on humanity.


message 7: by Jaycee (new) - added it

Jaycee Limutau Is there a book that you would recommend that you believe is more accurate? Because I'm somewhat unfamiliar with it all I'd like to at least try a few sources. Thanks! =)


Jennie Jaycee wrote: "Is there a book that you would recommend that you believe is more accurate? Because I'm somewhat unfamiliar with it all I'd like to at least try a few sources. Thanks! =)"

Unfortunately, no. I was looking for an education myself and ended up with this instead. Some of the other reviewers have made some recommendations, I think, but I just haven't had a chance to check them out.


message 9: by Philip (new)

Philip Maybe try "Comanche Moon" by Jack Jackson. It's a non-fiction graphic novel about Cynthia Ann Parker and Quanah Parker. It's been years since I read it, so I don't remember the details, but I recall it being well done.


message 10: by Nate (new) - rated it 5 stars

Nate It's a common misconception among white people that referring to first peoples as "Indians" is offensive, but this is in fact, not the case. Visit New Mexico and Arizona, and you'll see that it is the preferred term, which adorns various colleges and institutions run by and for Indians.


Jamie So the author wrote a 400 page novel to just bash the Comanches? I think if you dig deeper what he's trying to show is how this tribe, living nothing like the way we live and behaving nothing like the way we behave, and only comprising a few thousand people, can still inspire respect and awe at their military might against the well organized, well funded, well trained US Army.


Jennie He didn’t write a novel. This is supposed to be a work of non-fiction about the Comanche in which Comanche voices are largely absent. I see absolutely nothing of respect or awe in a book in which he regularly uses words like “pariah,” “barbarian,” and “noble savage” to describe people he allegedly admires. There is no respect in detailing every drop of blood and every rape in Comanche raids on white encampments when his description of US military raids on Comanche encampments consist mostly of dry tallies of the dead.

My problems with this book can be summed up pretty simply: it’s that by mostly leaving out Comanche voices and by using those types of descriptions, he reduces “The Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History” to barely-human caricatures who might as well have been dancing around fires patting their hands over their mouths like some children’s game in a black & white tv show. This is a book that belongs in 1950, not 2010.

Again: Noble Savage.

Also again:

Rachel became entirely Comanche. She shed her pioneer clothing for Indian buckskins, and, though she does not comment on it, would have been as filthy and bug-ridden as any of the Comanches, who were notable even among Indians for their lack of hygiene.

If that’s his idea of respect, I’d hate to see his disdain.


back to top