karen's Reviews > In the Woods
In the Woods (Dublin Murder Squad, #1)
by
by
it must be really hard to write convincing mystery novels. you can't have your killer be too obvious or no one will bother reading past the third chapter. but you can't have them be too unexpected, without textual support, or you will be accused of cheating. the super-saturation of police procedurals in all their manifestations: literary and film and teevee, sets the genre up for failure - it just adds up to a steaming bowl of repetition and a dessicated medium. there are about five ways a murder plot can resolve itself, and the rest is wallpaper and window dressing.
and then there is this. and for the most part, it falls into the same traps - the main-plot resolution is facile and a little yawn-y, but tana french has massive balls for her treatment of the subplot. she evidently does not care about infuriating her readers. i am reading the second novel now, just out of anger - technically it is for class, but it's above and beyond the demands of the syllabus. i have never read a book out of rage at the author before. can i get a plaque??
and i refuse to say why and how and when this book began to push my wrath-buttons, but push them it did, and those of you who have read this will understand me when i howl, (and maybe one of you can tell me why i am still watching lost when it started failing me like three seasons ago - but this is the diseased impulse we are working with here - i will see this second tana french book through, even though it is not doing for me what i had hoped the first one would do for me. is this coded enough?? good.)
i asked the near-mythical tom fuller about his take on this book, and he said "i liked it until i didn't". which sounds forrest gumpy, but is spot-on the way i felt about it. it has its good points: the irish setting is well-rendered, there are some great descriptions of people, places, and things, the two detectives have a wonderful rapport... until they don't . (see how flexible that kind of assessment is??) it's not all "wee bairns" and Lebor Gabála Érenn, but syntactically it is delightfully irish, and that part of it is a pleasure to read.
dunno - this isn't the worst, i just figured that genre fiction had to play by certain rules in order to be invited into the clubhouse. tana french is a subversive lass, aye, to be sure.
go ahead, read it, and come howl with me.
come to my blog!
and then there is this. and for the most part, it falls into the same traps - the main-plot resolution is facile and a little yawn-y, but tana french has massive balls for her treatment of the subplot. she evidently does not care about infuriating her readers. i am reading the second novel now, just out of anger - technically it is for class, but it's above and beyond the demands of the syllabus. i have never read a book out of rage at the author before. can i get a plaque??
and i refuse to say why and how and when this book began to push my wrath-buttons, but push them it did, and those of you who have read this will understand me when i howl, (and maybe one of you can tell me why i am still watching lost when it started failing me like three seasons ago - but this is the diseased impulse we are working with here - i will see this second tana french book through, even though it is not doing for me what i had hoped the first one would do for me. is this coded enough?? good.)
i asked the near-mythical tom fuller about his take on this book, and he said "i liked it until i didn't". which sounds forrest gumpy, but is spot-on the way i felt about it. it has its good points: the irish setting is well-rendered, there are some great descriptions of people, places, and things, the two detectives have a wonderful rapport... until they don't . (see how flexible that kind of assessment is??) it's not all "wee bairns" and Lebor Gabála Érenn, but syntactically it is delightfully irish, and that part of it is a pleasure to read.
dunno - this isn't the worst, i just figured that genre fiction had to play by certain rules in order to be invited into the clubhouse. tana french is a subversive lass, aye, to be sure.
go ahead, read it, and come howl with me.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
In the Woods.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
February 11, 2010
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-50 of 66 (66 new)
message 1:
by
brian
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Feb 11, 2010 08:05PM
reply
|
flag
and i'm not a book snob, don't you remember my review for monsters of templeton - it has been proven by sceince!
i did like this book, for the most part, but i was frustrated with some of the resolution-choices, which i thought should actually be the strength in this genre. but that's my fault for expectations.
these are all for my reader's advisory class - which i love. some of the books i am not totally looking forward to (the romance streak is about to begin), but it is good exposure. i just thought i would enjoy the mystery segment a lot more, but who knows, maybe it will turn out that i am a huge fam of westerns, against all my expectations.
watch this space.
are they written in dialect? i have heard rankin is good. i helped the cutest scottish girl at work yesterday - i have always had a crush on that accent.
Thanks for the review, I am oh so glad there I am not a lone ranger when it comes to some mysteries. This is a genre that can get too well-done. And your thoughts were the cherry that convinced me all the more!
Kel
This made me laugh, because I had pretty much the same response - and I even made the mistake of assuming that Rob's mystery would be solved in the following book.
grr x 2
i still think i am correct in my assessment, but i am now a tana french convert!
yeah, the fourth one is just out: Broken Harbour"
Thanks! I don't know why i keep reading them, i get SO pissed off every time. Probably b/c she is a very, very good writer. (haha i like that sentence - may as well have written "she is one of the goodest writers!")
Well, fucktacks anyway, on we go. :)
Ha ha. I almost rated the book one star out of revenge but cooler heads prevailed in the end.
I need to check them out , then .Thanks.
or the next...
or, presumably, the new one.
grrrrrrrr"
From my understanding, he just goes to the wayside and it the stories continue on with her and the different depts/cases that she moves on to?
The book irked me, but I still loved it. Drove me a little batty not knowing though.