Stephen's Reviews > The Alienist
The Alienist (Dr. Laszlo Kreizler, #1)
by
by
Stephen's review
bookshelves: award-nominee-bram-stoker, ebooks, historical-horror, sherlockian, house-like, horror
Feb 12, 2010
bookshelves: award-nominee-bram-stoker, ebooks, historical-horror, sherlockian, house-like, horror
This book was FIZZING which, according to my 19th Century Art of Manliness glossary, means excellent, top notch. Well, fizzing it was. Through most of this book, I had it rated at 5.0 stars as I was absolutely captivated by the writing, the characters and the plot and loved how they were all deftly tethered to a great depiction of late 19th Century everyday life.
I would describe this as a psychological thriller and detective mystery set in the 1890's and blending a Sherlock Holmes type investigator (i.e., Dr. Lazlo Kreizler) and a Hannibal Lector/Jeffrey Dahmer like serial killer straight of today. For me, what set it over the top good was the healthy dose of historical fiction thrown in for interesting background. It just gave the book a unique, interesting feel as it had the darkness and grit of a present day "hunt the serial killer" story but with the customs, constraints and daily rituals of 19th Century New York life.
In addition, to the excellent job the author did in establishing a sense of place, I also really liked the way Carr incorporated into the narrative several "real life" murderers that were contemporaries of the killer in this novel. This added a sense of authenticity that upped the creepy on the rest of the plot. For example, the book refers to Dr. H.H. Holmes whose murders were depicted in The Devil in the White City: Murder, Magic, and Madness at the Fair that Changed America and Jesse Pomeroy who was depicted in Fiend: The Shocking True Story Of Americas Youngest Serial Killer).
The main character, Dr. Kreizler, was excellent abel focused a great vehicle to carry the plot forward. The pacing was good and mytstery solving aspects of this novel (i.e., the piecing together of clues and discussions of what they mean) about as good as it gets. There is real talent in this work and I was greatly impressed by the read.
My one gripe is that I thought the ending, while in keeping with the tone of the rest of the book, was a little flat. I was hoping for a better payoff and ended up with a slight case of literary "blue brains" when I didn't get the release I was hoping for. Thus I lowered my overall rating to 4.5 stars because nobody likes "blue brains."
Still I would HIGHLY RECOMMEND this to fans of the genre or just someone looking for a great story. I will definitely be checking out the sequel.
Nominee: Bram Stoker Award for Best Novel.
I would describe this as a psychological thriller and detective mystery set in the 1890's and blending a Sherlock Holmes type investigator (i.e., Dr. Lazlo Kreizler) and a Hannibal Lector/Jeffrey Dahmer like serial killer straight of today. For me, what set it over the top good was the healthy dose of historical fiction thrown in for interesting background. It just gave the book a unique, interesting feel as it had the darkness and grit of a present day "hunt the serial killer" story but with the customs, constraints and daily rituals of 19th Century New York life.
In addition, to the excellent job the author did in establishing a sense of place, I also really liked the way Carr incorporated into the narrative several "real life" murderers that were contemporaries of the killer in this novel. This added a sense of authenticity that upped the creepy on the rest of the plot. For example, the book refers to Dr. H.H. Holmes whose murders were depicted in The Devil in the White City: Murder, Magic, and Madness at the Fair that Changed America and Jesse Pomeroy who was depicted in Fiend: The Shocking True Story Of Americas Youngest Serial Killer).
The main character, Dr. Kreizler, was excellent abel focused a great vehicle to carry the plot forward. The pacing was good and mytstery solving aspects of this novel (i.e., the piecing together of clues and discussions of what they mean) about as good as it gets. There is real talent in this work and I was greatly impressed by the read.
My one gripe is that I thought the ending, while in keeping with the tone of the rest of the book, was a little flat. I was hoping for a better payoff and ended up with a slight case of literary "blue brains" when I didn't get the release I was hoping for. Thus I lowered my overall rating to 4.5 stars because nobody likes "blue brains."
Still I would HIGHLY RECOMMEND this to fans of the genre or just someone looking for a great story. I will definitely be checking out the sequel.
Nominee: Bram Stoker Award for Best Novel.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Alienist.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
February 12, 2010
– Shelved
January 27, 2011
–
Started Reading
January 29, 2011
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-18 of 18 (18 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Cassy
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Dec 30, 2010 12:30PM
reply
|
flag
I don't remember liking this one at all, but I might give it another try since I respect your opinion so much!
That's nice of you to say, Lea. I know others whose tastes are generally similar to mine who also didn't care for this one either. It certainly happens.
I just moved to NYC, so this sounds really intriguing, now.
I see you rated The Quincunx 3 stars but had some nice things to say about the writing and narrative up to the end. On balance would you recommend it? I have had it for a while and I keep meaning to tackle it.
as far as the 3 stars rating goes, i'm a sort of rigorous (or snooty) rater. 3 stars to me definitely means I Liked It...i may not read it again, but it was an enjoyable or worthwhile experience nonetheless.
I hope you like it Kate.