Randal's Reviews > The Catcher Was a Spy: The Mysterious Life of Moe Berg

The Catcher Was a Spy by Nicholas Dawidoff
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
14421553
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: baseball, nonfiction

One of the dullest books I've ever read.
Part of the problem is that it's so well-researched. Berg went to London for two weeks, where, wearing his usual white shirt, grey suit and black tie, he stayed at the Claridge Hotel and dined with this person and that person, although he did not submit timely expense accounts, and then he disappeared for two weeks, turning up in Stockholm, where he dined with this scientist and still did not submit his expense accounts -- while wearing his usual white shirt, grey suit and black tie.
Just a fantastic amount of work must have gone into researching that. But:
Who cares. And that's toward the end of his active spying at the end of WWII, before we get onto Moe didn't know what to do with the rest of his life so he didn't really do much.
It's not so much a narrative -- he's repeatedly portrayed as wildly charming but almost none of that charm comes across in the book ... he's discriminated against in a general, WASPish way in Princeton, but then having gone to Princeton opens doors for him with the OSS -- as it is a laundry list of an interesting but obscure life. The repeated inability to pull back that obfuscation leaves the reader a little puzzled even at the end about the subject of the book and eventually leaves one scratching one's head about why it's such a subject of focus: Berg went here but we don't know why; Berg went there but didn't talk about it. If you are happy making up exciting things Berg might have been doing during the lapses, the book's likely a better read.
I wanted very much to read and like this book. All I can say is I read it.
5 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Catcher Was a Spy.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 7, 2014 – Shelved
October 7, 2014 – Shelved as: to-read
June 8, 2015 – Started Reading
June 8, 2015 – Shelved as: baseball
June 8, 2015 – Shelved as: nonfiction
June 10, 2015 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Quo (new) - rated it 4 stars

Quo Who Cares?? Many if not most serious baseball fans & anyone interested in a psychological portrait of a complex & fascinating American, who just happened to play baseball as well. If all you want is box scores of games Moe Berg played in, they are available but for anyone intrigued by the person beneath the uniform, Nicholas Dawidoff's book excels.


Randal When I wrote "Who cares" I was very clearly referring to the level of minutiae that tells us (repeatedly) what Berg was wearing and his lack of attention to expense receipts, but not what missions Berg was on in between the meals. But feel free to talk down to strangers on the internet if it makes you feel better.


message 3: by Quo (new) - rated it 4 stars

Quo I am not talking down to you or anyone else but blaming an author for scholarship/serious research, while assuming that no one cares about what he has uncovered merely because you are not interested, speaks down to the majority of readers. If in doubt, take a glance at some of the 4* & 5* reviews by G/R reviewers who found the book quite worth their time. Typically, I read reviews that praise a book, as well as those that find a book not to their taste or their attention span.

And, just for the record, Nicholas Dawidoff did not "make things up". Oddly enough, you are criticizing the aurhor's heavy base of research, while at the same time suggesting that he just made things up. There are a great many books that are in absolute awe of the statistics that surround sports figures & idolize former ball players but The Catcher Was A Spy is not among them.


message 4: by Gigi (new) - rated it 1 star

Gigi One of my biggest criticisms of nonfiction writing is when an author needs to tell us absolutely every detail he found in his research. I expect a good writer to synthesize and sift through the mundane and present a coherent narrative. I don’t much care what day of the week it is or name dropping people without context. I agree with Randal.


back to top