Ted's Reviews > Hiroshima Nagasaki: The Real Story of the Atomic Bombings and Their Aftermath
Hiroshima Nagasaki: The Real Story of the Atomic Bombings and Their Aftermath
by
by
When all is said and done this is just another long piece of revisionist history. While it is fair to say that there will be those who will always question the justification for the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Ham makes some ludicrous claims to support his contention that the use of these weapons did nothing to contribute to Japan's surrender. Ham states that by early 1945 Japan was a defeated nation, that it had lost the air war, the sea war, that Japanese ground forces throughout the Pacific were defeated, that the American naval blockade had choked Japan's capacity to make war, that Japan was defeated economically. All of this is undeniably true, and yet Japan refused to surrender. Ham gives a long and detailed account of Lemay's "terror" bombings of Japanese cities, describing the death and destruction and displacement of millions of Japanese and yet agrees that these "terror" bombings had failed to force Japan to surrender. By April 1945 the Japanese Suzuki government embraced a war policy called Ketsugo whereby the home islands would be defended to the last man, woman, and child. While repeatedly stressing the misery visited on the civilian population, Mr. Ham does not assess Japan's lingering military capabilities. Richard Frank ("Downfall") and D.M. Giangreco ("Hell to Pay) have demonstrated that these capabilities were formidable. Ham claims that the fears of 500,000 to one million casualties were not made until after the war, and were made simply to justify the atomic bombings. This is utter nonsense. Based on the massive American casualties incurred in the capture of Okinawa, American military leaders expected severe casualties with the invasion of Japan's home islands. Staff working for Adm Nimitz calculated that the first 30 days of Olympic alone would cost 49,000 men. MacArthur's staff concluded that America would suffer 125,000 casualties after 120 days. Admiral Leahy estimated that the invasion would cost 268,000 casualties. Personnel at the Navy Department estimated that the total losses to America would be between 1.7 and 4 million with 400,000 to 800,000 deaths. The same department estimated that there would be up to 10 million Japanese casualties. Few would argue that the combined shock of events - the dropping of atomic bombs and the entry of the Soviet Union (in Ham's mind, far more important than the bombs) into the war against Japan forced Japan to surrender. To say that this book is the "real" story of the atomic bombings is a stretch - a big one at that.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Hiroshima Nagasaki.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
November 3, 2014
–
Started Reading
November 3, 2014
– Shelved
November 4, 2014
–
Finished Reading
August 30, 2019
– Shelved as:
hiroshima-nagasaki
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Td
(new)
-
added it
May 30, 2019 01:24AM
When the victors write the history to absolve themselves of all sins, anything that seeks to straighten out the record is automatically 'revisionist'. However, when Ham reads the US memo's sent at the time and finds that the causality estimate figures reported at the time are far less than what is reported after - that is not nonsense! This is the actual truth. Not the self absolving lie of the victor. When Ham reads that in the Japanese records that the discussions of those in command of the war is on the disposition of the Soviets is of far more importance to them than that of use of the bomb - that is not nonsense! That is the actual truth. Not the excuses of a guilty conscience. If you want to have what you 'know' confirmed, then don't pick up a book with "The Real Story of" in the title. However, if you want to challenge your beliefs then don't treat the propaganda of history as gospel.
reply
|
flag
Td wrote: "When the victors write the history to absolve themselves of all sins, anything that seeks to straighten out the record is automatically 'revisionist'. However, when Ham reads the US memo's sent at ..."
Simply stated, Hamm's contention that estimates of high U.S. casualties in an invasion of Japan was a "postwar creation" to justify the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is simply not true.
Simply stated, Hamm's contention that estimates of high U.S. casualties in an invasion of Japan was a "postwar creation" to justify the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is simply not true.