Scott Rhee's Reviews > Treasure of Khan

Treasure of Khan by Clive Cussler
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
5717792
I have never read a Clive Cussler novel until "Treasure of Khan", which is, I think, the 20th novel in his long-running Dirk Pitt series. My Cussler deprivation is not due to any calculated or irrational dismissal of the author; I just never got around to reading him. Starting with the 20th book in the series is probably not wise, as Cussler has reached that "I can basically write a 200-page shopping list and any publishing company will publish it" status, which is never a good thing. For proof, see anything by James Patterson.

Cussler also has a co-writer for this one (his son, Dirk Cussler), which, in my opinion, is ALWAYS a red flag. When well-known authors start writing "with" other people, it usually means they have become so lazy that they can't come up with any new ideas of their own, or they wrote a quick outline for a novel and had someone else actually write it. Again, see James Patterson.

So, truth be told, I was a bit leary about this one, and I didn't have high expectations. Consider my surprise and delight that I actually enjoyed the book.

I'm not going to lie: it starts slow. The real action didn't kick in until around page 150 (out of 600), the first 150 pages devoted mostly to scene-setting and necessary (but excruciatingly dry and, at times, textbook-like) backstory. I'm guessing Cussler books all follow a similar formula: at some point in history, a ship carrying treasure or objects of vital importance is lost; fast-forward hundreds of years to modern times when a clue is uncovered that reveals the possible whereabouts of said lost ship; adventurer and treasure-hunter Dirk Pitt and his crew go off to find it, only to encounter numerous obstacles and nefarious villains trying to prevent him from finding it.

I'm guessing each Cussler book is a "fill in the blank" in terms of historical period, lost treasure, modern-day clue, and nefarious villain. In this case, the book starts with a dying Genghis Khan in the 13th-century. The treasure is the long-lost burial place of Khan. The modern-day clue is a scroll found on the body of a dead archaeologist. The villain is a mysterious multi-billionaire who has access to untapped oil riches in Lower Mongolia and a giant gun that can create earthquakes.

Yes, it's pretty silly. It's part Indiana Jones and part James Bond, and it's all ridiculous, but it's good, clean fun. While it's not exceptionally good writing, it's good enough that it makes me want to go back and read Cussler's early work, when he wasn't just getting published on his name alone.
11 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Treasure of Khan.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 28, 2014 – Started Reading
November 28, 2014 – Shelved
November 30, 2014 – Finished Reading
December 2, 2014 – Shelved as: action-adventure
December 2, 2014 – Shelved as: archaeology
December 2, 2014 – Shelved as: maritime
February 6, 2018 – Shelved as: clive-cussler
February 6, 2018 – Shelved as: history
June 1, 2021 – Shelved as: underwater-monsters-and-mayhem

Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Cathy (new)

Cathy DuPont Hi Scott: I've read at least one and I believe two Cussler's. Obviously, I did not find them memorable since I can't remember how many.

I feel the same as you re: Patterson and the need to have co-authors. Unfortunately a couple of my very favorite authors have done that i.e had ghost writers after writing an outline or perhaps, like CC, the name is on the book, family or not.

Great going, your review and thanks for the 'heads up.'


Scott Rhee Hi Cathy! I was truly surprised how much I actually enjoyed this one, and I actually look forward to reading some of the early Cussler classics, like "Raise the Titanic" and "Night Probe", which I have heard from several people are great. I do find it somewhat sad when authors whom I once admired start "selling out" and becoming franchises. When a series starts becoming a job to read and all the plots start blending together, it's time for that author to throw in the towel. That's why I love authors like Lee Child and Michael Connelly, who aren't afraid to do different things to make their series seem fresh.


message 3: by Cathy (last edited Dec 04, 2014 12:00PM) (new)

Cathy DuPont Scott wrote: "Hi Cathy! I was truly surprised how much I actually enjoyed this one, and I actually look forward to reading some of the early Cussler classics, like "Raise the Titanic" and "Night Probe", which I ..."

Hi Scott:

I agree with you re: Michael Connelly for sure. I read one to many of Child's Reacher so haven't been keeping up with him. And it's not because I don't have any on my shelf either. I just get caught up with trying some new other authors and go back to those early hard-boiled which I like.

But getting chancy at my age??? That sounds odd; chances are taken by the young. I'm too settled to take chances.

Re: "selling out." Stuart Woods should have hung it up years ago...how much money do these fellows need?

Someone could make a fortune counting how many women Woods' character Stone Barrington has bedded then writing a book about them!


Neil Hello, Scott. I enjoyed reading your review. Inre "at some point in history, a ship carrying treasure or objects of vital importance is lost" - it's not always a ship. Sometimes it is an airplane; one time, it involved a train. ;D Personally, I my favorite is Treasure, then his earlier ones (like Night Probe!, Vixen 03, and Raise the Titanic!).


back to top