Jason's Reviews > Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West
Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West (The Wicked Years, #1)
by
by
I’ve pretty much stopped buying lunch at my work cafeteria because no matter how often the description of the day’s entrée induces those salivary glands into action, the end result is always terribly disappointing. The food looks like it should be good—braised beef that seems savory, fresh-looking tomatoes to impart a robust flavor, colorful specks of herbs that hint of a certain deliciousness and make the tummy grumble. So it’s a fresh shock to the system almost every time when it turns out to be nothing but a ruse. Doesn’t it takes a special kind of talent to start with what appear to be such promising ingredients and to produce with them a dish as utterly bland and as pitifully uninspiring as that cafeteria food invariably turns out to be?
Well, doesn’t it?
Well, doesn’t it?
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Wicked.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
October 16, 2010
– Shelved
April 7, 2012
– Shelved as:
for-kindle
March 5, 2013
–
65.0%
"“Gossip is instructive,” said the Wizard. “It tells which way the wind is blowing.”
Word."
Word."
Started Reading
March 8, 2013
– Shelved as:
2013
March 8, 2013
– Shelved as:
reviewed
March 8, 2013
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 64 (64 new)
message 1:
by
Brigid
(new)
-
rated it 1 star
Jan 27, 2012 03:14PM
One of the worst books I ever wasted time on. Don't even think I finished it (and I managed to finish all the Twilight books) that's how bad it was. Go see the musical much better.
reply
|
flag
Yeah I had a friend who loves all of his books. It's pretty rare I don't finish a book when I've read more than half (and I only got that far cause I kept trying to figure out why she loves it so much) but man it was really terrible. Let me know though, I'm curious which side you end up on.
I believe there is only one book I've ever read that I couldn't finish (this one), and not because it wasn't readable either!
I'm with Brigid. Loved the musical, hated the book. I finished it eventually - but I hated every page.
I think the book was great... Best in the series... It does contain politics and my friend was not liking it because of that. He also enjoyed the musical better....however, I was so involved in it and i felt the politics fit the story perfectly... I loved the book....I hope when you start that you can enjoy it as much as I did.
I can't wait for your review, duder. I was among the seeming many who just did not enjoy this book (that last section or two did not hold my interest at all: I blame the musical) but just read something about the story's politics that is seriously making me reconsider my years-ago lukewarm reaction.
I kind of think I would hate this book. A lot.
There's never enough magic to turn tofu into prime rib. Unfortunately, you don't need magic to turn either one into sh*t.
My mom got this for me once years ago because she knows my love of Baum, the Wizard of Oz, etc. I couldn't make it through it. I finally sold it back, mostly unread. I felt bad because I hardly ever don't finish a book, but this one did not interest me at all. Some reviews I've read (like this one) make me see I'm not missing anything.
Brigid wrote: "2 Stars seems very generous."
Because I didn't actually hate it. I thought some parts were decent; I just wish the author had made up his mind. He seemed to fluctuate between wanting to portray a character's descent into evil (which he totally fails to do, by the way), and to explore the nature of that which constitutes evil (which isn't explored any more than the Colosseum is "explored" by a camera-wielding tourist from Orlando as her bus drives by it). So like, failure on all those levels, and really flat characters and a complete lack of humor which is sad, given the ingredients, but I guess I still didn't have a seething hatred for it.
Because I didn't actually hate it. I thought some parts were decent; I just wish the author had made up his mind. He seemed to fluctuate between wanting to portray a character's descent into evil (which he totally fails to do, by the way), and to explore the nature of that which constitutes evil (which isn't explored any more than the Colosseum is "explored" by a camera-wielding tourist from Orlando as her bus drives by it). So like, failure on all those levels, and really flat characters and a complete lack of humor which is sad, given the ingredients, but I guess I still didn't have a seething hatred for it.
Frances wrote: "There's never enough magic to turn tofu into prime rib. Unfortunately, you don't need magic to turn either one into sh*t."
It's books like this that make me respect fiction writing all the more. Maguire shows how hard it really is to create a good story.
El wrote: "My mom got this for me once years ago because she knows my love of Baum, the Wizard of Oz, etc. I couldn't make it through it. I finally sold it back, mostly unread. I felt bad because I hardly ..."
Yeah, I mostly felt bad for the book, because Elpheba is so boring where she should have been fascinating. She's like the middle sister from Downton Abbey.
It's books like this that make me respect fiction writing all the more. Maguire shows how hard it really is to create a good story.
El wrote: "My mom got this for me once years ago because she knows my love of Baum, the Wizard of Oz, etc. I couldn't make it through it. I finally sold it back, mostly unread. I felt bad because I hardly ..."
Yeah, I mostly felt bad for the book, because Elpheba is so boring where she should have been fascinating. She's like the middle sister from Downton Abbey.
I am very disappointed. Now you have to read Just Kids which might be the only book I hate more than Wicked. Although I managed to finish it.
I quit during the Philosophy Club scene, and then about a year later my friend talked me into finishing it because he swore it got better. But it didn't. It's like Doctor Who. The first season is awful. Everyone says you have to stick through the first season to appreciate the later seasons. But I don't want to sit through a season full of crap, you know?
Haha, I often feel like it probably takes more effort to make terrible tasting yet appetizing food than it would to just make ugly yet delicious food.
Sorry this one is such a bummer, it seems people either adore this series or just spit it back out as you have, I think I'll continue to avoid it. Have you seen the stageshow though? I've heard good things.
Sorry this one is such a bummer, it seems people either adore this series or just spit it back out as you have, I think I'll continue to avoid it. Have you seen the stageshow though? I've heard good things.
s.penkevich wrote: "Have you seen the stageshow though? I've heard good things."
I'm seeing it tomorrow on Broadway!
I'm seeing it tomorrow on Broadway!
ooo nice, I am jealous! Hope you love that more than the book. It is hard to not enjoy a Broadway production though, it's just such an event to see something like that. Have fun!
Nice, enjoy (much more than the book. And hopefully you will have delicious tasting AND delicious looking food after it)
The first time I saw Wicked (I have seen it four times), I bought a VIP ticket that came with a cocktail at intermission. Now THAT is the way to see Broadway.
Fine, but if you try to satiate your hunger with food from my work cafeteria, don't say I didn't warn you!
I first saw the musical on Broadway in 2007 and loved it, despite being the only person in the world who has never actually watched 'The Wizard of Oz' from start to finish. For various reasons mostly to do with the company I keep, I ended up seeing 'Wicked' several more times in different cities and not getting sick of it. So I was fairly confident I'd like the book on the basis that, you know, the book's always better than the adaptation. Wrong. I finished it, but what a chore that was.
Yeah, it's just a very unfocused book. Like, there's a whole theme in there about class struggle but then it almost seems like Maguire went, "but wait, let's not make it about class struggle," and then it became about determinism, instead. Which also isn't the point, really, either. I probably would have liked it a whole lot more, though, if Elpheba weren't such a chore to read about.
I could not even finish this. A disappointing lunch is a good analogy, Jason. This book seemed like a good idea at the time, but just turned out to be a total mess.
There goes my tepid interest in giving this a second chance. You really picked the perfect metaphor, though I'm sorry that you had to suffer through constant gustatory disappointment to arrive at it.
I hope you enjoy the production more than this book!
I hope you enjoy the production more than this book!
Thanks, Suzanne and Aerin. Yeah, Madeleine, I'm really pretty excited to see the stage production of this, and on Broadway at that! Don't feel bad for me, though. I didn't hate it. If you hadn't read it, I wouldn't steer you away from it, but I absolutely don't think a re-read is going to improve its impression on you.
Jason wrote: "Thanks, Suzanne and Aerin. Yeah, Madeleine, I'm really pretty excited to see the stage production of this, and on Broadway at that! Don't feel bad for me, though. I didn't hate it. If you hadn't re..."
Ooooh, I missed the Broadway part. That is even better! I'm sure the cast has changed a bit since I saw the show in, like, '05 but I still feel pretty confident in saying that you are in for a treat.
Ooooh, I missed the Broadway part. That is even better! I'm sure the cast has changed a bit since I saw the show in, like, '05 but I still feel pretty confident in saying that you are in for a treat.
I think the author lives near you, Jason. Hope someone's watching your house while you're on Broadway.
That bad, eh? I have a friend who keeps trying to get me to read this. Now I can respond to her with cafeteria food.
I have grown fond of the music since I saw it on Broadway but I thought the story was a lot of claptrap...they should have called it Witless!
The plot is a mess and there's really nothing in the book to redeem that. The musical at least has a couple of great characters but even the musical's storyline is no less convoluted. It's almost like someone went, "Ok this makes no sense but let's sing at the top of our lungs about it and people will think they're seeing something truly great."
Jason wrote: "The plot is a mess and there's really nothing in the book to redeem that. The musical at least has a couple of great characters but even the musical's storyline is no less convoluted. It's almost l..."
The Broadway belt has saved many mediocre shows, including this one. Was the theater filled?
The Broadway belt has saved many mediocre shows, including this one. Was the theater filled?
Amazing-after all these years! I saw it in 2003. It's a good thing you and I aren't Broadway producers. We'd go broke...
Sorry, Null. It wasn't bad. But it definitely wasn't as good a musical as most others I've seen. My wife loved it, though! And whoever played Glinda was pretty freaking awesome.
I love the music. And the costumes are sparkly. I don't care about the holes in the plot. "The Wizard and I" is fun to sing. "Popular" (if Glinda is good) is fun to watch. "Defying Gravity" (If Elphaba is good) gives chills (if Elphaba is bad it comes off as shouty). And "For Good" gets me choked up.