Lyn's Reviews > Atlas Shrugged
Atlas Shrugged
by
by
Atlas Shrugged is a flawed epic, strident with a swaggering ambition, yet almost fable-like in its overly simplistic social and economic criticisms.
This is more of a philosophical, social commentary than a literary monument. The characterization is where it fails; Rand draws stick figures for antagonists: caricatures, strawmen to act as foil to her politico-economic-social vehicle. This is the book that made everyone mad in the late fifties: progressive liberals were spurned due to its vitriolic anti-government stance and conservatives stayed away in droves due to Rand’s over the top atheism.
As provocative and controversial as it is, I wondered at the society that had produced Rand and marveled at the influence she had on our culture since its publication. I have read many controversial books, and have wondered how many critics have actually read the work; Atlas Shrugged makes me wonder how many fans have actually read it.
Rand would no doubt be critical of big business today with its corporate dollar laden cushions and aristocratically removed “leadership”. Rand’s libertarianism shares with Sinclair’s socialism in that it looks good in print.
The length? Yep, it’s a 1300 plus page monster. Rand forces her readers to be submerged, to live in the dystopian wasteland for two or three months to fully comprehend her vision.
Finally I am left with a feeling, an assurance, that I do not like Ms. Rand and don't care for her arrogance and her casual dismissal of much of what is good in society.
*** 2021 - thought about this and have decided that even if I don't care for Rand, disagree with much of her ideas, I did like parts of this book
This is more of a philosophical, social commentary than a literary monument. The characterization is where it fails; Rand draws stick figures for antagonists: caricatures, strawmen to act as foil to her politico-economic-social vehicle. This is the book that made everyone mad in the late fifties: progressive liberals were spurned due to its vitriolic anti-government stance and conservatives stayed away in droves due to Rand’s over the top atheism.
As provocative and controversial as it is, I wondered at the society that had produced Rand and marveled at the influence she had on our culture since its publication. I have read many controversial books, and have wondered how many critics have actually read the work; Atlas Shrugged makes me wonder how many fans have actually read it.
Rand would no doubt be critical of big business today with its corporate dollar laden cushions and aristocratically removed “leadership”. Rand’s libertarianism shares with Sinclair’s socialism in that it looks good in print.
The length? Yep, it’s a 1300 plus page monster. Rand forces her readers to be submerged, to live in the dystopian wasteland for two or three months to fully comprehend her vision.
Finally I am left with a feeling, an assurance, that I do not like Ms. Rand and don't care for her arrogance and her casual dismissal of much of what is good in society.
*** 2021 - thought about this and have decided that even if I don't care for Rand, disagree with much of her ideas, I did like parts of this book
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Atlas Shrugged.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
July 3, 2011
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)
date
newest »
After these comments I might just read Fountainhead. It has been on my shelf for some time and after Atlas Shrugged I thought it would sit there until the end of time.
Linda, if you only read one Rand book, I would recommend Fountainhead, better literature and a more palatable message. Anthem is good (and short!) but is a template dystopian and explores little new ground in that sub-genre. Atlas Shrugged ultimately turned me against Rand.
I must admit that I skimmed a lot of A.S. and completely skipped that 70 page announcement which seemed to be repeating, and repeating.
I loved this book when I was 19, but always felt that it would not stand up to a repeat reading several decades later. Well-said, Lyn.
Your 're-post' of this, reminds me that it is time I re-read this again. What is best about this novel for me, is not the social commentary and all that bull-shit. What makes me love this book, is the excellent story and the entertaining style of the writing. It was the first scify (science fiction/fantasy) before I discovered Heinlein and all those others.
Thanks, Denis, we were talking about this earlier and made me think about it and I made a slight change.
Good review. I, too read this back in my youth, and enjoyed it as a novel--I'm not a fan of her philosophy. And how about that speech John Galt gives towards the end? That was a bit gratuitous.
Thanks, Sharyl. My views on this book have trended consistently downward since setting it down. No doubt she was a talented writer and was a gifted artist. That said, this left me cold and since I finished it, my thoughts have only darkened. She left that one character to die in the desert and I thought that was the last straw as for her philosophy and the value of this work.
Thanks, Apatt. If you want to wade hip deep in 1300+ pages of "meh" then by all means … Rand was a good writer and it is a passable good story, but too long and too preachy and that is without Rand's personality that bleeds through
Lyn wrote: "Thanks, Apatt. If you want to wade hip deep in 1300+ pages of "meh" then by all means … Rand was a good writer and it is a passable good story, but too long and too preachy and that is without Ran..."
I don't even have enough time to read my friends' recommendations let alone the ones they discourage me from reading :)
I don't even have enough time to read my friends' recommendations let alone the ones they discourage me from reading :)
I was thinking of a rather appropriate comment a friend made about this book, "Atlas shrugged, so did I"
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy: that is the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.”
- John Kenneth Galbraith
or "I've got mine, f'ck you"
- John Kenneth Galbraith
or "I've got mine, f'ck you"
William, that is succinctly stated, thanks. Looking back, that is at the heart of why I don't like her
In my own words -
GREED is a MENTAL ILLNESS.
It's why people with a million times as much money as the poor still feel they don't have enough.
GREED is a MENTAL ILLNESS.
It's why people with a million times as much money as the poor still feel they don't have enough.
My opinion of this book has always been that the story would have been better told in a graphic novel (a comic book) because then the evident superhero qualities of John Galt would be obvious and the acceptance of it as fantasy would be far easier.
Really liked the book until the part with the "innovater resort" started and I suddenly hated it and dnf'd. Her whole philosophy is so disgusting but her writing in parts is so good I didn't notice it at first.
(My young son, by the way, named his cat Dagny.)
Nice work man.