Neil's Reviews > The Overstory

The Overstory by Richard Powers
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
33119635
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: 2018, 5-stars, 2018-booker, 2018-top-books
Read 2 times. Last read September 18, 2018 to September 22, 2018.

Further Update. I can't help it: Powers' writing does something to me. I've now finished a re-read of this book and I am going back to 5 stars. It's a book that really rewards a second reading. It is much darker than I remember from first read (suicide, disillusionment, betrayal on top of the destruction of the natural world) and also much more emotional. The latter of those two surprised me because I thought that knowing the story would reduce the emotional impact, but the reverse happened.

I loved all the comparisons of speed (humans, the natural world, computers) and I got a lot more out of Neelay's story this time through.

So, whilst I can understand the criticisms some have made, I'm choosing to ignore those bits and take the novel as a whole which is, I think, required reading.

---------

Update: on reflection, I got a bit excited about having a new Richard Powers book to read and I have definitely, despite what I say below, read better books this year. Consequently, my rating has dropped to 4 stars. There is also the fact that Powers himself has written several books better than this one.

—————

Two quotes from different parts of this book:

"The best arguments in the world won’t change a person’s mind. The only thing that can do that is a good story."

And

"Yes! And what do all good stories do?" There are no takers. Neelay holds up his arms and extends his palms in the oddest gesture. In another moment, leaves will grow from his fingers. Birds will come and nest in them. "They kill you a little. They turn you into something you weren’t."

I should come clean at the start of this review. Richard Powers is my favourite author. I have read all his previous novels and have been desperate to read this one ever since I first heard about it a few months ago. I am grateful to the publisher, via NetGalley, for the opportunity to read an ARC a couple of months prior to publication date.

The overstory is the name given to the part of a forest that protrudes above the canopy. When you look at a rainforest, for example, what you see from above is the canopy with trees standing out above it. What you don’t see unless you get into the rainforest is the understory that sits below the canopy but above the ground, then the shrub layer below that and, finally, the forest floor.

It is clear from page 1 of this book that the trees will be the stars of the show. Repeatedly, they are referred to as "the most wondrous products of four billion years of creation" and the book is shot through with the most astonishing and mind-blowing information about trees. In particular, the book tells us a lot about how and what trees communicate with each other. For example, when a tree comes under threat from an insect of some kind, it tells its neighbours who respond by releasing insecticide to protect themselves. In a large forest, many trees whose roots meet actually meld their root systems together making the whole forest an interconnected network where the trees nurture their young and heal their wounded. Not so long ago, all this was the stuff of ridicule, but today a lot of it has been demonstrated and more is being discovered all the time.

What Richard Powers wants his readers to realise is what this means for humanity. He wants us to realise how important trees are for the world. And he chooses to do this not with a text book but with a story.

His story is structured like a tree. The first 150 pages consist of the "Roots". These are 8 apparently independent short stories giving us the back story for 9 different people. One, for example, tells us the family history of a some immigrants into America (mid-1800s) ending with an artist in recent times who inherits the family collection of photographs all of the same chestnut tree taking at monthly intervals over generations. In another, a hearing and speech impaired scientist discovers that trees are communicating with each other. The unifying theme across all the stories is the presence of trees. And it is worth noting those trees because, as many people know, trees have huge mythical and symbolic meanings and the trees Powers chooses for each of his characters are not random selections.

The next 200 pages are "Trunk". Here the stories of the individuals that we now know quite well start to merge and connect. Some merge completely, others connect tangentially. This passage is overtly political. Don’t expect an unbiased overview: this is an impassioned plea for the protection of trees set in the form of a story. It is an attempt to make readers realise how temporary humans are in the grand scheme of things…

"But people have no idea what time is. They think it’s a line, spinning out from three seconds behind them, then vanishing just as fast into the three seconds of fog just ahead. They can’t see that time is one spreading ring wrapped around another, outward and outward until the thinnest skin of Now depends for its being on the enormous mass of everything that has already died."

…and how much more permanent trees are…

"Out in the yard, all around the house, the things they’ve planted in years gone by are making significance, making meaning, as easily as they make sugar and wood from nothing, from air, and sun, and rain. But the humans hear nothing."

Then we have 120 pages called "Crown" where the stories separate after a dramatic climax to Trunk, but remain connected, branching out in different directions.

Then, finally, "Seeds" tells us some of the outcomes of the stories and leaves us poised for the next steps in others. It includes a plea for us to look at things differently.

"The planet’s lungs will be ripped out. And the law will let this happen, because harm was never imminent enough. Imminent, at the speed of people, is too late. The law must judge imminent at the speed of trees."

I think this is perhaps one of Powers' most accessible novels. It feels to me, fresh from finishing it, like his most passionate one. Yes, there is some science, but a lot of it is explained carefully. This novel does not require the scientific background that some of Powers' novels have asked the reader for. And there is no music in this book, which is the other thing that Powers often includes in his novels and often does so in a fairly technical way. This one is, by contrast, far more emotional: it feels like a book Powers has written because he wants, as the quote at the start of this review says, to change people’s minds. In my case, he is perhaps preaching to the converted because I am already a believer in conservation and already convinced of the importance of trees. Even so, this book taught me many things and fired up a stronger passion in me for the natural world. I have to hope that others will read it and become equally convinced of the need for intelligent conservation work.

I know I am biased because of my love for all of Powers’ novels, but I think it is possible I have now, even only in January, read my favourite book of 2018.
408 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Overstory.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 24, 2017 – Shelved
January 19, 2018 – Started Reading
January 20, 2018 –
23.0% "“He tells her how the word beech becomes the word book, in language after language. How book branched up out of beech roots...”. 5ete seems to be a bit of debate about this, but interesting that most people think not only the paper we use for books comes from trees, but also the word itself."
January 20, 2018 –
30.0% "Sidetracked for a couple of hours internet research into how and what trees communicate with each other. Some I already knew, but it is completely mind-blowing. Powers has always been about interconnections, but he has turned all the dials to 11 this time!"
January 21, 2018 –
70.0%
January 21, 2018 –
70.0%
January 22, 2018 – Finished Reading
September 18, 2018 – Started Reading
September 18, 2018 –
page 1
0.2% "Re-read because

A) I am heading into London to hear Powers talk about the book next week
B) I am hopeful the book will be shortlisted for the Booker later this week so this is an early strike in my planned re-reading
C) I liked it"
September 20, 2018 –
page 275
54.78%
September 22, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-44 of 44 (44 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

Meike Great review, Neil! I just gave it one of my votes on the MBP 18 list! :-)


Neil Thanks, Meike. I am a bit biased when it comes to Richard Powers, but I was hooked all the way through this. I guess it might partly be because it is about something I feel strongly about. But it will get my vote, too.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer Sounds very interesting. The music parts have put me off his other books. I don't think I can face reading this long a book on a Kindle app though so I will pass on Net Galley I think and wait for publication.


Neil Fair enough. As you know, I don’t have any issue with reading on a Kindle. Even if I did, I think I would make an exception if it meant I got to read Powers! It IS long, though (as with all his book), so best to make sure you are comfortable with the format before you settle down.


Paul Fulcher Never mind the trees, you omitted to mention the fact that would have sold Gumble and I on the book instantly....

one of the characters is an actuary!!

three years ago, she thought actuarial science was the same as accounting. When the counselor told her it dealt in the price and probability of uncertain events, the rigor combined with ghoulishness made her declare, Yes, please. If life demanded a slavish commitment to one pursuit, there were worse things to commit to than calculating the cash value of death.


Paul Fulcher Mind you another character is a Yale economist who thinks if three sisters inherit three rings and have to choose which ring each gets, there are apparently 13 ways of doing it.

I assume later on the trees tell her to speak to the actuary to work out 3 factorial.


Neil I have no recollection of that. I thought they just shut their eyes and grabbed. I don’t remember a discussion of how many options there are! Reading too quickly, I guess!


message 8: by Neil (last edited Feb 08, 2018 12:19AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil Ah - got it - only a mathematician would think someone saying “there’s a right way to do this and a dozen wrong ways” is actually saying there are 13 ways. And also think that the comment is about outcome not process.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer Just seen some of the quotes on Paul's review.

I will be waiting for this to be published in hard copy before I complete (it's just too long for me to manage on Netgalley) but I can already sense a 1 star review.


message 10: by Neil (last edited Feb 11, 2018 12:46AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil I’ve read Paul’s review. It seems fair comment apart from his remarks about 3!, which I have commented on both above and now on his review. Slightly surprised a big American author can get 4 stars from Paul and looking forward to your 1 star review (it won’t change my mind, though). Partly, although I don’t see myself ever becoming an eco-warrior, the whole subject of conservation and of trees is fascinating to me, so I found it completely compelling from that point of view - it is completely biased and possibly not 100% accurate, but, as Paul notes, I think one of Powers’ main aims is to get people to look up more information on trees etc. and if it does that, it will become an influential book.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer I bought a number of people last year as a Christmas present " The secret life of trees" which I think did some of the same in a non fictional format. It's certainly an interesting topic and I am looking forward to reading this novel.

It's the insurance and actuary parts that will cost it stars.


message 12: by Nick (new) - rated it 4 stars

Nick Lovely review; looking forward to reading this'un.


message 13: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian Scuffling They way you describe this unique structure of several lives reminds me of The Familiar—will be eager to read this one; a Powers sucker myself.


message 14: by Neil (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil Different to TF as the stories are not mixed at the start - separate short stories to introduce characters followed by main story where they start to merge. If you like Powers, I think you will like this one.


message 15: by Gerhard (new) - added it

Gerhard Wow, what an impassioned review! This is definitely going on my 'must read' list.


message 16: by Neil (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil Well, I am a rather biased fan of Powers’ writing, so my reviews may not be the most objective.


Sherril I just heard of The Overstory as it appeared on the screen of my Kindle. The tree theme intrigues me and I'm considering recommending it to my Bookclub. My reservation, however, is that I had chosen Richard Power's book, The Echo Maker many years ago, having read great reviews of it and no one, including myself, liked it. I understand that you are biased towards the author, but still I am wondering if you could give me a bit more insight as to recommending it or not. I am adding it as a 'to read' book on my Goodreads account. Thanks. Your review was exceptional


message 18: by Hope (new)

Hope H. Spring 2018: Having never encountered this author prior, I appreciate your colorful review.


message 19: by Neil (last edited Apr 20, 2018 11:40PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil Hi Sherril. If you did not like The Echo Maker, I am not sure you will like this. This one has an interesting structure, but it is still clearly written in Powers’ style which is probably what you didn’t like. I’ve read all Powers’ books and whilst all are different, I would say The Echo Maker is the one most like The Overstory.


Denise I felt exactly the same way when I read this. I keep recommending it to other book lovers. The only thing I warn them about is its length, which is great, but for me no word is wasted. It's a beautiful, poetic book by one of my favorite authors. And I think you are spot on about its emotional strength.


message 21: by Dan (new) - rated it 5 stars

Dan Neil wrote: "Update: on reflection, I got a bit excited about having a new Richard Powers book"

Aww, Neil, we love it when you get "a bit excited".


message 22: by Neil (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil :-)


message 23: by Neil (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil It is always good when books get us excited. But sometimes it is also good to calm down again later!


message 24: by Roger (last edited Aug 22, 2018 04:31AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Roger Brunyate An excellent review, Neil! When I was preparing my own, I glanced at the very beginning of yours, and thought I would probably go with four stars also, in part because of the things you label "overtly political" on one hand and "tangential" on the other. But when it came down to it, I couldn't do it; Powers, like Melville, is so visionary that, even when flawed, he deserves all you can give him.

But I missed the music. R


message 25: by Neil (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil I agree. As you probably know, I am a huge Powers fan (really looking forward to seeing him in London at a reading in a few weeks) to the extent that I would probably give his shopping list 5 stars. But, I don’t think this is his best and I wanted to reflect that in my rating. It is tricky - Part if me wants to give all his books 5 stars (perhaps not Operation Wandering Soul), but part of me wants to differentiate between them somehow. And I do think a couple of the books on the Booker long list are better than this.


Roger Brunyate No need to explain your dilemma, Neil; we all encounter it. The whole star system is (a) highly subjective, and (b) inevitably skewed to one's expectations of the author. R.


Catherine de Marin Loved this review & your passion


message 28: by Neil (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil Thanks, Catherine. In real life I am a nature/wildlife photographer and the natural world is very important to me. This is why the themes Powers explores resonate with me so much. I talked to him at a book signing the other day and he is genuinely passionate about the natural world and about man as having a place in it that is not just subjugating and using it, but living in harmony with it.


message 29: by Dana (new) - rated it 5 stars

Dana Monroe I just finished this 2 days ago & want 2 reread asap! Im haunted & soooo impacted by this book Lifelong reader, dont recall EVER feeling like this


message 30: by Neil (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil Dana - I'm glad you enjoyed the book. If you are a lover of nature, especially trees, like me, I guess it is perfect reading material!


Barbara great review,Neal. This has been on my TBR list since it came out. I have also purchased some of his older books at a library sale. His books seem to be just what I like in a novel.


message 32: by Jen (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jen I feel pretty much as Dana does - I’m haunted by this book. I struggled to get into it (it’s my first novel by Powers) but once I did, it had me hooked. And although I finished it less than 30 minutes ago, I want to reread it. I’m sure there is more that I will see/understand/feel on a second reading. Thank you for your review and for confirming my gut instinct here.


message 33: by Doug (new) - rated it 5 stars

Doug Just over halfway through and it's been much more emotionally charged than I thought. The critiques had me expecting something altogether more dense and detached.


message 34: by Neil (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil I think it is his most passionate book. When I met him at a book signing in London last year I said that and he agreed. But I have never agreed with those who say he writes unemotionally.


message 35: by Ruth (new) - rated it 5 stars

Ruth You’ve convinced me to do a reread.


Claire Pickett A slow reader, I never reread anything but this is one story that I must live again. I am a gardener and an activist who was touched deeply.


message 37: by Eric (new) - rated it 5 stars

Eric Thank you for your review. I was surprised at how much dislike for this book I saw online, after I finished reading. I am recommending it to everyone, not often does a book make me feel so different than before I read it.


message 38: by Cris (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cris What is your favorite RP book?


message 39: by Neil (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil Hi Cris. I am not sure I can answer that. I have read all but Generosity twice (I will fix that next week). I think I would say that The Time Of Our Singing is my favourite. However, I was surprised at how much better Plowing The Dark seemed on a second reading than I remembered it from my first. And Orfeo contains some of my favourite bits of his writing.

Are you asking because you want to read one or because you also have a view on your favourite?


message 40: by B (new) - rated it 5 stars

B Yeah I imagine first-read speed takes some of the darkness away that one gains with a second, more ambling read


Faith Krausman I too am rereading it and getting more out of it. There are many sentences that are a fore shadowing or a reminisince of a former time. For example, one character is near the place where another character used to go camping with her father and two sisters. On first reading, not sure what this means, but on second, know all too well. There are many examples like this, especially about the one character that stares at the table in his prison early on, thinking about its rings. There are so many tied up loose ends on the second reading, it affords greater understanding for me. It was fine without that, but reading it again provides a thicker foundation, as if I am bringing more to the table. And what wood is the table made of?


message 42: by Juli (new) - rated it 4 stars

Juli I just finished listening to the audiobook and am already feeling a strong pull to start from the beginning again, because I wasn't ready for it to end, and I feel the chemical story formulas of the book have not had a chance to fully take hold. I so appreciate your review.


message 43: by Andi (new) - rated it 5 stars

Andi Beautiful review Neil. I put off reading this for too long and loved it so much more than I expected to!


message 44: by Neil (new) - rated it 5 stars

Neil Thanks Andi. I understand why some people didn’t like this book, but it really worked for me. And for you it seems!


back to top